[ANN] [BTC FORK] [BITFINEX] Bitcoin Interest - Decentralized Savings - Join Now

[Ayms]

"not authorized", you "authorize" things?

"There is no way to claim our coins yet as we have not made it public. Also there is no GitHub available yet as we are finalizing mainnet. We have not released it to avoid pre-scams. And to insure stability."

Well, BTG for example made some mistakes but was much more transaparent than all of the other forks after them

Not releasing your code at this stage seems strange (you could do it without releasing any info about the nodes), as well as not releasing a well seeded torrent so people can sync from the snapshot

Then please disclose both code + explorer as soon as it is available and notify here, without tricky things and/or fake bugs and/or misleading things as most of the current forks are doing (BCD for example among others, there is quasi always a strange thing somewhere in latest forks)

And please take a deeper look at the tool (and eventually put it as an official link on your website), it's not encouraging people to "claim" coins, which means nothing as explained in the repo, but to manage things by themselves without having to trust potential dubious/scammy wallets

And if you have an issue with it then please argue accordingly instead of suspecting it by default

[1715411129]

1715411129

[1715411129]

1715411129

[1715411129]

1715411129

[alexgold]

very nice idea I hope the developers will collect the required amount of funds.

[Ayms]

Not sure if the last comment is intended for myself and to criticize the dev fees, which indeed is a complete scandal given that you can also lower the network fees to the minimum

Anyway, @soferox since the code is not available for now what we would need is the same as https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-transactions/blob/master/tx.js#L192-L204 for BCI and the hex representation of a transaction performed by BCI (ideally 1 or 2 inputs (with associated addresses and amounts) and outputs), thanks if you can send it

[onionpealer]

I have some Bitcoin held on Binance but it looks like they have not bothered with the Bitcoin Interest fork, even though they have done so with many other forks. I do have some Bitcoin in my Electrum desktop wallet, is there a way to get Bitcoin Interest from this Electrum wallet ?

[Ayms]

I have some Bitcoin held on Binance but it looks like they have not bothered with the Bitcoin Interest fork, even though they have done so with many other forks. I do have some Bitcoin in my Electrum desktop wallet, is there a way to get Bitcoin Interest from this Electrum wallet ?

You could use the above tool (as soon as we get the code or the info to include BCI), but please read what is explained, from a technical standpoint there are no reasons to rush to claim your coins, you have them already, except if you see other reasons to move your coins

[soferox]

"not authorized", you "authorize" things?

"There is no way to claim our coins yet as we have not made it public. Also there is no GitHub available yet as we are finalizing mainnet. We have not released it to avoid pre-scams. And to insure stability."

Well, BTG for example made some mistakes but was much more transaparent than all of the other forks after them

Not releasing your code at this stage seems strange (you could do it without releasing any info about the nodes), as well as not releasing a well seeded torrent so people can sync from the snapshot

Then please disclose both code + explorer as soon as it is available and notify here, without tricky things and/or fake bugs and/or misleading things as most of the current forks are doing (BCD for example among others, there is quasi always a strange thing somewhere in latest forks)

And please take a deeper look at the tool (and eventually put it as an official link on your website), it's not encouraging people to "claim" coins, which means nothing as explained in the repo, but to manage things by themselves without having to trust potential dubious/scammy wallets

And if you have an issue with it then please argue accordingly instead of suspecting it by default

We will disclose all of this, so you can see nothing wrong is going on. We will be transparent don't worry, but no point in releasing something till it is 100%. I'd rather take some extra time and know something is good, rather than have all the bugs and stuff BTG ran into first few weeks.

[Ayms]

Thanks, then little advise: take the time to release an official well seeded torrent for the snapshot state uniquely referenced with a magnet link, this will not solve all the issues for people to sync but will be definitely helpful

And thanks if you have time to send me (by email if you prefer) the requested info, I understand that we are not in a hurry but then I can close that one

[Admkng5]

This idea of interest is stolen from Minexcoin. But here no information about wallets, pools. Also team does not answer to my questions. I wrote 2 times to Nicholas Dooley in tekegram messenger, then he saw my messages, but no answer for it. Team ignoring users.
And Minexcoin has a good team, which answers to users, good support, all works fine. Also Minexcoin has a good mobile app.

[jukKas]

This idea of interest is stolen from Minexcoin. But here no information about wallets, pools. Also team does not answer to my questions. I wrote 2 times to Nicholas Dooley in tekegram messenger, then he saw my messages, but no answer for it. Team ignoring users.
And Minexcoin has a good team, which answers to users, good support, all works fine. Also Minexcoin has a good mobile app.

And Minex stole their idea from FreelaBit, and they stole it from somewhere else etc, until we reach Bitcoin which was the original idea. Every blockhain coin stole their idea from Bitcoin, right?

[Ayms]

Also team does not answer to my questions. I wrote 2 times to Nicholas Dooley in tekegram messenger, then he saw my messages, but no answer for it. Team ignoring users.

I pointed out here too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2515675.msg29345177#msg29345177

And see this too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2515675.msg29375171#msg29375171

That's a new tendancy, forks do not answer to anything and do not provide any basic information

[memii]

It is understandable point that team wants to make sure of everything if all is working fine before going to release wallet,source and other links. But Source link could have been provided by now as more than a week already passed. People can't wait to start claiming their free coins they are loosing patience. I have eye on official site to see when all necessary links will be up.

[pumz]

Opening page was last modified on 9th January since then OKex and HitBTC are mentioned there as confirmed while negotiation with others is in process. You have two good exchanges already so the coins looks ready for trading at least to have some start. When can we expect the remaining functions to be done ?

[Ayms]

It is understandable point that team wants to make sure of everything if all is working fine before going to release wallet,source and other links. But Source link could have been provided by now as more than a week already passed. People can't wait to start claiming their free coins they are loosing patience. I have eye on official site to see when all necessary links will be up.

I am asking for ~10 parameters and a real BCI transaction, I don't think it's too much

This allows to check what they are doing and add BCI in the tool https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827163.msg29326000#msg29326000 (see the replay protection story... everybody should be very careful before claiming coins because if a fork messes up with this then you could have your coins moved without knowing it)

[soferox]

It is understandable point that team wants to make sure of everything if all is working fine before going to release wallet,source and other links. But Source link could have been provided by now as more than a week already passed. People can't wait to start claiming their free coins they are loosing patience. I have eye on official site to see when all necessary links will be up.

I am asking for ~10 parameters and a real BCI transaction, I don't think it's too much

This allows to check what they are doing and add BCI in the tool https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827163.msg29326000#msg29326000 (see the replay protection story... everybody should be very careful before claiming coins because if a fork messes up with this then you could have your coins moved without knowing it)

Again before anything happens. WE will release everything. Everything is complaining or saying other things, but why would we release something that we don't feel 100% about. Again everything you guys want, source code, wallets, etc. will all be released just be patient as things aren't achieved over night and syncing a blockchain of this size can take a very long time, its about 170GB, so you can imagine it can take a minute. Also creating a block explorer is not something that is hard, but takes time also. We appreciate the patience, just bare with us and things will end up just fine. Stay tuned to site and here I will link everything once it is done.

Thanks,
Aaron

[Ayms]

You are still syncing the chain??? You did not sync before your snapshot??? You must be kidding...

[Admkng5]

My questions were not about it. But gave simple answer is better, than ignoring of users.
Minexcoin team not ignoring users.

[soferox]

My questions were not about it. But gave simple answer is better, than ignoring of users.
Minexcoin team not ignoring users.

There is a minex thread to talk about that. Here is not the place. Minex did not invent the concept of interest, so we could not have copied them. Also we don't take interest from miners like they do, we invented a new dual reward system, so not the same. The idea of interest and bitcoin go very far back.

You are still syncing the chain??? You did not sync before your snapshot??? You must be kidding...

We are syncing new nodes yes. We aren't just going to have one. Of course we have 1 fully synced node, but we don't want to have just one. We are also making a mining pool too, so we have a lot of components. We also need to test wallet syncs too, which would require a full download. So yes, we wanted to test a download from start to finish. Thats good practice, rather than just take snapshots of the block files and copy paste they all over.

We are in testing phase and testing everything. So again to clarify that means syncing of blocks to a new node server, and not just copying snapshot files. This is the proper way to test wallets and so forth. We are not supporting your github files, so once we release source if you want to do something with them that is fine, but we do not endorse any of it.

Thanks,
Aaron

[Ayms]

We are not supporting your github files, so once we release source if you want to do something with them that is fine, but we do not endorse any of it.

Fine, I am not asking you to endorse anything, so don't use this kind of excuse and please provide now the requested information, the main question is not about including it in my "github files" (strange and apparently diminishing appellation or you did not get what it is doing since there is only one main file), which I might not do, but to check what you are doing, mainly the signatures and replay protection

So please stop eluding this and send it

The rest of your answer is a kind of funny, everybody knows what it takes to sync nodes, and of course you are not going to have just one, this has been tested over and over again, come on... seems like you are discovering the thing

[xlcus]

Have we already had a working main net core wallet?
Do we have a working exchange which accepts deposit?

[Admkng5]

The question is in ignoring users.
You write here as a children.