Bitcoin Forum
November 07, 2024, 01:39:42 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 ... 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 [847] 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 ... 914 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)  (Read 1080130 times)
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 07:18:44 AM
Last edit: October 07, 2013, 07:50:13 AM by BitCsByBit
 #16921

I'll just put this here:

http://blockchain.info/tx/1fb6257ca1a61f10a03c742b7000f542776a7ad7c5f81aef98f2a31fa6c0f542

tl;dr - 251.9519 BTC payout from Just-Dice hot wallet to the above mentioned Labcoin wallet used for the IPO.

Nice catch. Wonder if this could be labcoin too:



Nope, I believe was mechs.

Edited.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
bitmoon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 07:20:47 AM
 #16922

hi guys

meh, im so griefed after btct shutdown. some ppl actually pushed to buy above 0.002 after trade resume, then it started collapse very hard after people made up there mind not keep stay with them with btct shutdown.

so next is to wait and see there next so called promise 15th october right to get the stuff back? if not maybe delay for 2-3 days, then after that if nothing, we kiss ourself good bye on mirror.

if they get there stuff, at this point i dont care if its there own asic or not, and it hits 2-6 TH, then some people will go with smile on there face to bed.

then next, when they have that 6TH running, then next week gets listed on bitfunder, then people with the smile happly places ask walls of high prices, would griefed people buy back?

assume, they started nearing 20TH from 6TH, on october 21,  will stock rise?  i feel many people will not come buy back at higher price, not sure how people mind work.



Look up the meaning of scam.

scam word does not matter at this point for most people, cuase we are already on loss. if that next promise dont happen, then truth is solidified , and most ppl will bite there lower lip with there upper tooth sets.

again, its already a loss, those who paid very huge, are in different sort of grief level. (they might get grief over again, if they hash 6TH on next week).

i say again, for me, its useless now, all im hoping what he said on QA is true,
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 07:48:11 AM
 #16923

Serious question: is there any evidence that Sam is a real person?

Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 07:50:35 AM
 #16924

This company is never going to be listed on another exchange.

They have lied and misrepresented themselves in provable ways.  


Labcoin_dev was NOT Howard Wang's assistant as he represented himself to be.  Howard Wang has no idea who he was and said that whoever it was made a number of technical errors.  This is not rumor or supposition, this is verified fact.

Howard also stated he never turned over the design files for the chip.  Without those, there is no way they could have manufactured his chip.  It's not possible.


Given these blatant lies to shareholders, their actual plans are irrelevant.  No exchange is going to take them. It's not a gamble, it's not going to happen. Period.
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 07:53:38 AM
 #16925

Serious question: is there any evidence that Sam is a real person?

Howard did say that Sam was cc'd on some emails that he received.  Howard never interacted with Sam directly, however.

dexX7
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026



View Profile WWW
October 07, 2013, 07:54:11 AM
Last edit: October 07, 2013, 08:15:06 AM by dexX7
 #16926

Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.

Expect to spend some time analysing it.

I found another 2,631.9077 BTC elsewhere, but it seems to be spent for some hardware. I'm waiting for a response regarding whom does that wallet belong to.

Potentially hardware labcoin promised for the mid October hash rate.

Would it be possible that you may post all "known" addresses from Labcoin with a short explaination? Thanks.

Edit: pleasealso include possible paths + direction.

Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:10:01 AM
 #16927


Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.



Why would the dividend wallet connect to the ipo wallet?  Funds should never move between the two...

ssshhh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:20:57 AM
 #16928

So labcoin has been looking to replace him for over a month?! No tapeout for the 130nm chip?!  WTF!

Not even a tapeout of the 180nm chip; they dont have anything, and thats even less than I was willing to believe.

On the bright side, no tapeouts and no chips means they had virtually zero expenses. If you are gullible enough to believe serial liars and scammers routinely return their loot to their victims, labcoin should still have almost all of the IPO coins.
'Sam' said they only had about half of the IPO funds left.

And ofcourse he would never lie about such things.

Here is the "unspent" money:

http://blockchain.info/address/15p8MtnUt7qxLus7v6V5d61fDGRAX3tVTY

SOURCE?


Follow the money from the IPO:
http://blockchain.info/tx/94ece99ddeef16696fa5a4ebe05a6e3f3e08695a521c51a644c3af63b4b47109

Labcoin wallet where they received the IPO funds:
http://blockchain.info/address/1ovYFPS1HiGFMQVTB3vuWtnEpGvRxZ6H7



Does anyone know how accurate the "Tree view" is on blockchain.info

http://blockchain.info/tree/82917927

BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:21:47 AM
 #16929

Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.

Expect to spend some time analysing it.

I found another 2,631.9077 BTC elsewhere, but it seems to be spent for some hardware. I'm waiting for a response regarding whom does that wallet belong to.

Potentially hardware labcoin promised for the mid October hash rate.

Would it be possible that you may post all "known" addresses from Labcoin with a short explaination? Thanks.

dex, for some reason the money has been moved around a LOT, and it has gone through many different wallets.
In some wallets funds stayed only around 30 minutes before being split and moved, it almost seems that they were trying to make it difficult to trace it.
I don't have time to compile all the details right now.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:23:31 AM
 #16930

Does anyone know how accurate the "Tree view" is on blockchain.info

http://blockchain.info/tree/82917927

Well the country flags can be very inaccurate, but the transaction path is known as its just reading the blockchain. (If you are asking, "is the transaction tree accurate?" then yes its 100% accurate)

EDIT: However I am not sure that is Labcoin's coins. It looks like its a gamblers coins. I think you are tracing the wrong person.
ssshhh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:27:34 AM
 #16931

Does anyone know how accurate the "Tree view" is on blockchain.info

http://blockchain.info/tree/82917927

Well the country flags can be very inaccurate, but the transaction path is known as its just reading the blockchain. (If you are asking, "is the transaction tree accurate?" then yes its 100% accurate)

EDIT: However I am not sure that is Labcoin's coins. It looks like its a gamblers coins. I think you are tracing the wrong person.

Thanks.  Reason for asking is that a bulk of the remaining funds have passed few a few stateside wallets, but if the I.P(s) are inaccurate this line of investigation will be fruitless..
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:37:26 AM
 #16932

Thanks.  Reason for asking is that a bulk of the remaining funds have passed few a few stateside wallets, but if the I.P(s) are inaccurate this line of investigation will be fruitless..

I heard that the IP addresses are the miners that relayed those transactions or the node's IP that relayed the transaction to the miner that confirmed the transaction, either situation would not show the IP of the person who actually moved the coins unless they connected directly to the miner which is a rare thing.

I could be wrong.
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:39:42 AM
 #16933


Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.



Why would the dividend wallet connect to the ipo wallet?  Funds should never move between the two...



Sure, also why would the dividends from 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm be moved to 2 different addresses before being paid out? Don't you think that's strange as well?

03/Oct/13     10.57764752 BTC     1EoWoQ3XFJwF4kNw39hhnP4xC96pVXbwXt
24/Sep/13     14.66844734 BTC     19z5qVRTbMKkBwecQM3FFTeqQbPfkUwQsY

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
JimiQ84
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:48:29 AM
 #16934


Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.



Why would the dividend wallet connect to the ipo wallet?  Funds should never move between the two...



Sure, also why would the dividends from 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm be moved to 2 different addresses before being paid out? Don't you think that's strange as well?

03/Oct/13     10.57764752 BTC     1EoWoQ3XFJwF4kNw39hhnP4xC96pVXbwXt
24/Sep/13     14.66844734 BTC     19z5qVRTbMKkBwecQM3FFTeqQbPfkUwQsY

aren't those internal btct.co addresses?
BitCsByBit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 08:51:10 AM
 #16935


Blockchain.info

If you start with the dividend wallet 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm and follow the money, it takes you all the way to the IPO funds.



Why would the dividend wallet connect to the ipo wallet?  Funds should never move between the two...



Sure, also why would the dividends from 17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm be moved to 2 different addresses before being paid out? Don't you think that's strange as well?

03/Oct/13     10.57764752 BTC     1EoWoQ3XFJwF4kNw39hhnP4xC96pVXbwXt
24/Sep/13     14.66844734 BTC     19z5qVRTbMKkBwecQM3FFTeqQbPfkUwQsY

aren't those internal btct.co addresses?

17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm  is a labcoin div address.

Not sure about the other 2, but I would find it strange that labcoin would be forwarding the dividends to a different btct address each week.

Tipsy jar: 1HgfLMXiJQj9KZ7abLRh9rWuR7dgeSyub4
Bitcycle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 09:26:24 AM
 #16936


I'd have thought Sam would have been anxious to come here and share some good news about his progress.

Maybe clarify a few issues as well.

And yet...where is he?
ampu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 102


CLEARSIGHT- THE #1 BLOCKCHAIN JOB PLATFORM


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 09:30:11 AM
 #16937


I'd have thought Sam would have been anxious to come here and share some good news about his progress.

Maybe clarify a few issues as well.

And yet...where is he?

And where is TheSwede75?

ShroomsKit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 07, 2013, 09:37:01 AM
 #16938


I'd have thought Sam would have been anxious to come here and share some good news about his progress.

Maybe clarify a few issues as well.

And yet...where is he?

It's a scam. You didn't notice this yet?

Its price is not a very relevant factor in its adoption....
bitmoon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 09:37:25 AM
 #16939


I'd have thought Sam would have been anxious to come here and share some good news about his progress.

Maybe clarify a few issues as well.

And yet...where is he?

lol, he didnt bother to post on btct for investors during bitcointalk offline, so why he should here.

if nothing comes up until next week, or even showing up then its over, all the log therefore is solidified truth.
bitmoon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 242
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 07, 2013, 09:50:46 AM
 #16940

seroiusly im fed up, only reason im here is cuase TheSeven was part of team,  i got interested in his asic's he made and he sold some and released opensource code and simple schematic.

bah, why didnt theseven rescue us from this mess, if he experienced same communication problem and performance.

same applies to howard,  they didnt give a shred of word or hint to safe us from mess going way far.

we got tree shaken up n down, ppl kept losing, some profitting, i believe for a few ppl to profit, there are huge ppl has to lose.

all this time no rescue from them, atleast i heard that seven got pm-ed from investor, but his reply had no clue, just working on 65nm.

edit: i think the 65nm is halted, and they focus on current problem,  i read it some where in those logs QA , etc, u posted guys
Pages: « 1 ... 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 [847] 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 ... 914 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!