How to Choose a Good ICO

[vike]

Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.

Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?

Thanks for any suggestions

Hi, i think you should pay attention to the team(twitter, linkedin), about token (minting, mining), and what they offer to the clients! 

[1714475732]

1714475732

[IloveDigibyte]

I don't really trust ICO review websites and prefer to do my own research. The team is most important and the popularity of the project.

[balrog]

The best way to choose ICO is make your own market research . But if you haven't enough experience , you can try to trust to some ico rating charts .In most cases they provide users with fair information

[eugenefonts]

Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.

Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?

Thanks for any suggestions

You must check 1st the white paper and see their ideas if it got some pottential. Consider also the team behind if you dont see any information or description of the team we pass by. See also the social media or facebook or telgram of the Ico token the more participants the more chance of successful ICO. You can check also the icoratings.com to check their rating and ico review. You view also at youtube theres some people out there that are doing analytical review about the token.

[nelson4lov]

The best way to choose ICO is make your own market research . But if you haven't enough experience , you can try to trust to some ico rating charts .In most cases they provide users with fair information

That's right. Personal research is a mandatory requirement else one is bound to fail because the ico market is now crowded with vaporwares and scams. Due diligence is required. But It doesn't mean one shouldn't take advantage of resources at disposal though like ico review sites.

[Butchick]

with the numerous icos popping out everywhere, touching every technology there is, it is quite hard to determine the ones that are worth the risk from the others. as for me, one of he best way to do before you decide on which ico to invest in is to research about the ico, know the people behind it and check its technology; if it is realistic and can be used by a lot of people. Moreover, you also have to read its whitepaper so you will also have an idea on their plan.

[rudyconsl15]

You can consider in the first way look at the selling price. the second read the whitepaper carefully. the third Hard-cap and soff-cap him how ?, Pre-sale schedule and the composition of his team must be known. and most importantly there is no participating because otherwise it is a Scams.

[BurhanPSG]

If my suggestion we should be able to see the potential and development of ico project in the future. Because if ico is very potential and can be developed in the future. I'm sure this ico will be a success, and don't forget the concept, vision and mission of ico project.

[wewe123]

Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.

Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?

Thanks for any suggestions

The website - the person of any project, and ICO - not an exception. Therefore important to begin project assessment with it. Usually are posted on the website: information on the project, a contact information and the offer to buy tokens.

Description

It is very important to study the official description of the project. In it usually potential investors are told about architecture of the project, the market and risks. Special attention is paid to technical details. Here the project purposes have to be designated, the business plan and also accurately is provided and financing stages are it is clear specified. The purposes have to be logical and achievable. If the official description contains examples of a code or the reference to storage of data, is a good sign. The more technical details, the better.

If the idea is formulated vaguely, or authors abuse terminology to disguise a lack of sense of the message, is a bad omen.

Team

The good team is not less than 50% of success of the project. Therefore it is important that on the website there was information on participants of team, with the detailed description of their experience and a contact information. The project will look it more convincing if some of its participants already have behind shoulders other successful projects in the field of technology a blockchain.

Road map

Besides told above, the reliable website of ICO has to contain the road map describing financing stages what money, and time frames of implementation of the project will be spent for. It is necessary to pay attention to whether answer planned in the road map to the purpose to general purposes of the project, and how really to reach them in the specified terms.

If authors promise to make something improbable in very short time, it has to guard.

Having finished carrying out such research, it is necessary to estimate whether application in this project of technology a blockchain is justified. If it is not clear how the final product will benefit from use of this technology and as will be able to be ahead due to it of competitors, it is better not to be got involved in such ICO.

In choosing a good ICO you must gather some informations about this ICO where it is base find out what are the offerings it brought to the ads ,then you could also ask your friend about this ICOs , then try to search the manager of this ICOs if he can be trusted and how he manage the  projects , how he bring good profits to his members and his advices.It also important to joint this campaign the persons that can be trusted after all this project is vanishing like dust and no more.

[peach56]

A great method for me is to watch AMA's and read whitepapers or a summarised vision. What you really need to do is to highlight what makes a good ICO - what technology is going to expand and go big in blockchain, and also what partnerships are in place with businesses.

[TheBestICO]

Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.

Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?

Thanks for any suggestions

You must check 1st the white paper and see their ideas if it got some pottential. Consider also the team behind if you dont see any information or description of the team we pass by. See also the social media or facebook or telgram of the Ico token the more participants the more chance of successful ICO. You can check also the icoratings.com to check their rating and ico review. You view also at youtube theres some people out there that are doing analytical review about the token.

First of all, you have to check the website,whitepaper,roadmap and the project itself.
that's how you choose a good ICO, do not join if you think that ICO is not a good one.

[choubao0514]

Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.

[borovichok]

Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.

Yes, I also noticed this trend. There are even cases when all coins are bought out on private pre-sale by large investors. This is the current reality of the ICO. Now it's really hard to choose a good project because the ICO number has increased.

[Fioraver]

Now, it is much difficult to choosea good ICO project, their are more professional team working on it and they have private sales more than public sale, which makes us hard to buy.

Yes, I also noticed this trend. There are even cases when all coins are bought out on private pre-sale by large investors. This is the current reality of the ICO. Now it's really hard to choose a good project because the ICO number has increased.

I don't think that so many ICO is bad for business. Yes it a bit difficult to pick the best ones, but the number of ICO mean that popularity of crypto is growing and this is good.

[alekscrypto3969]

Yes, you should consider everything you just said like, Team, Roadmap, Product and how it is going to fit in this world, investments, Marketing, Soft Cap, Hard Cap and do they have detailed Whitepaper. If you have a good feeling about them, go for it or ask someone close to you that is familiar with crypto what they think.

[Jafri101]

Its a difficult question,  a little tough. Well there are many ICOs coming every other day. In order to pick the best you should have a little research on the project, go through the road map. Check the worth of its concept in world.

[kolbalish]

1) Protocol/dapp (especialy those that is solving some problems for NEO/Ethereum network)
2) Hard-cap less then 10-20 millions $.
3) Presale white-list, especially without public sales (whitelist only).
4) Good hype around (many viral in socials, blogs, here in topics like "most promicing ico of december")

Yes, those are needed also I also want to add something in this regard. For choosing good ICO,you need to read carefully the project's website and their whitepaper as well as.I think,those are enough

[Yusuf214]

There are many ways you can test but you should check out their development team and their community on large forums as this will help you to better consider before investing in an ICO project.

[batang_bitcoin]

I've seen someone created a related thread on how to choose a good ICO. How To Pick An ICO For Beginners.
It summarizes everyone's preferred ICO and what's the best way to choose a good one.

[izzy13]

I highly agree with this. Too many ico could means abundance. Abundance is riskful of inflation, which is could lead into instabilities. I, myself, would rather take reviews from senior players as well as the developer team's profiles..