How to Choose a Good ICO

[ChrisFour]

You need to check on all factors. You need to know who is the manager and team, you also need to study carefully about their project, whether it is reachable or not. Also, check those you have at least reached their normal or hard cap, because that's one factor that says the project is  seen by many others and is getting hyped which is important for new projects

[1714484878]

1714484878

[1714484878]

1714484878

[1714484878]

1714484878

[Help_You]

The main criterion for me ICO is a transparent implementation plan, the attractiveness of the idea and experience of participants in this field. In any case, is a venture capital investment, respectively, the optimal mixed portfolio by investing (in principle - 80% will not develop, 20% will show significant growth).

[electronicash]

you guys must have heard of selfpay. the team did a pre-ico last year and disappear after telling their investorS they will postponed the ICO. they collected funds durinv the pre-ico. Lesser like about 200 eth only  but most users exclaimed scam to this team as it looked like they were scam.

just days ago they announced a comeback and thiz time they are now registered in singapore government. very unpredictable but they are almost legit now.

[ludmilawolff]

Yes, you should consider everything you just said like, Team, Roadmap, Product and how it is going to fit in this world, investments, Marketing, Soft Cap, Hard Cap and do they have detailed Whitepaper. If you have a good feeling about them, go for it or ask someone close to you that is familiar with crypto what they think.

[RiannaPal28]

To choose a good ICO, check their whitepaper if it is well-written, fluent and can be understood by those who don't have PhDs.
Also, check if the team has technical experience relevant to cryptocurrency, blockchain, decentralization.
One example of a good ICO is VLUX. It is an integrated P2P energy trading solution, which combines cutting-edge artificial intelligence technology with blockchain.

Learn more about VLUX on their website https://vlux.io/

[omar bakrie]

I think all these things you can make as a reference assessment of a good ICO project. now it is a lot of ICO projects that have sprung up. And more and more crimes are occurring, just as it deliberately creates a scam ICO project. Untyk that we should not get stuck. And must assess the ICO project from many aspects. not just from one aspect only.

[jame lie]

There are many good ICO and you can find them only by researching. Take time to search and read about them and choose the one that fits better to you

[nvt2511]

I think before choosing an ICO to invest, amen investor must carry out a proper preliminary research to evaluate what the ICO is really all about, thorough reading of the white paper shoukd also be helpful.

[TehJoker]

there are many things we need to consider to choose a good projects. I wanna suggest you one website where posting good reviews about ICOs. That's Hacked.com. I hope you can get more good infomation with it.

[SeXy]

Pay attention to the development team, what experience they have in previous companies and whether some of them are public figures.

[Wellyan]

Use a rating site like icobench to get a good rating and also choose a good ico. susai with ico we want to invest.
because there is usually a choice of platfrom to choose according to ourselves.but also can do their own evaluation by looking at the team and also their experience

[CriptoDerby]

Hi guys, there are so many ICOs, such as those listed in https://www.coinschedule.com. It's pretty hard to review them one by one.

Which elements I need to consider, the team? the product? the promoting technology? or something else?

Thanks for any suggestions

One of the key factors to look for when deciding to invest in an ICO is the team. Trust in the team’s competency is a vital factor because (lets face it!) there are no guarantees for a return on your investment or fraud protection.

The first step I take when looking into a team is heading directly to the ICO’s website. To illustrate my example, I will take you through the team for TravelerToken (Travelertoken ICO - the cryptocurrency for Travel industry).

Clearly shown at the top of the website is a “team” section. If you are looking through an ICO’s website and they make no mention of their team, I advise you not to invest and leave the website immediately.

I like to look for a team that has experience in both crypto and the industry sector the ICO will be operating in. So for Travelertoken, I am looking for members of the team that have experience in tech, crypto/blockchain, or tourism/travel/hospitality.

One vote of confidence from this particular site is that it gives me direct links to the team member’s LinkedIn pages, email addresses and a short bios on their past experience. I see that the CEO, Thorben Biesenbach, has owned multiple businesses including some of which in the tourism industry. Next, I clicked on his LinkedIn link to double check that the same information in his bio is available on his LinkedIn. Lastly I do a quick google search on him to see if any major scandal pops up. For example if there was an article that accused Biesenbach of shady business practices I would probably shy away from investing in the ICO. Fortunately, Biesenbach and the rest of his team came up clean.

I repeat these same steps through the rest of the team. Pretty much what I am looking for here is confirmation that they are who they say that they are and they have some of expertise that could ad to the team.

From my quick search I see that they have multiple people with over 20 years experience in the travel industry, which is a positive sign. The team also includes people with programing, tech and entrepreneurial backgrounds.

The combination of the team’s skills meets my standards and I would consider investing in this particular ICO.

Hope I could help!

[cllo78]

To judge whether an ICO project is good or bad is to consider it from many aspects. For example, the relevant information disclosed in the white paper, such as the team's development experience, the composition of team members, you can also understand the rating on a reliable rating website.

[orssonlack]

I prefer ICO's with an already working product. For suggestions of such projects you can check the following thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2451482.0

Also, make sure to do your due diligence, read the whitepaper, check ICO review sites as well as forum threads. Scammy projects are getting better and better on making the projects seem legit so we need to be very careful when choosing projects to invest our hard earned coins in.

[evader11]

To choose a good ICO, firstly check the manager and team developer behind this project if it is trusted then read and understand what their project talk about such as whitepapar, roadmap and their thread and follow their facebook and twitter for more details. This way will help you to pick a reliable and promising campaign.

[tuansemazi]

The purpose of the ICO is to get Startup to address some of the community's problems based on Blockchain technology. In 2017, we calculated that up to $ 3 billion of capital was successfully channeled through ICOs, dozens of billion-dollar companies such as ADA, EOS ..., a growth rate that no industry match. It is estimated that if we invest in all ICOs, whether successful or failed, with compensation, you will generate more than 100% profit in 2017.


Before investing in an ICO, we need to investigate what the project solves, the potential for growth, the core value, the business plan, the growth target, and the management team. what size You can study Whitepaper yourself or see the review of a better person, consult experts, join the group of projects to make their own investment plans. FOMO should not listen to the seductive x5 ,x10 that all in

[drogas]

you guys must have heard of selfpay. the team did a pre-ico last year and disappear after telling their investorS they will postponed the ICO. they collected funds durinv the pre-ico. Lesser like about 200 eth only  but most users exclaimed scam to this team as it looked like they were scam.

just days ago they announced a comeback and thiz time they are now registered in singapore government. very unpredictable but they are almost legit now.

That's crazy. I guess it really shows you never know what's going to happen and how unpredictable things are with ICOs.

[chrisfatos]

Actually its all the things you have mentioned and so it is a bit of a time consuming process but needs to be done to avoid falling into scams or choosing an unsuccessful project. I use ratings to filter some ICos out

[ozgun_a]

I tend to research social media profiles of founders, CTOs and developers. Unless it is Satoshi himself, who doesn't have a Twitter / Instagram / Linkedin account?

[BlackWidow]

The first thing I look at is the ICO website. Is it possible to say that this site is a promising project or it is made in five minutes. Sometimes at this stage the interest in the project disappears. If the project is not a Scam, his team will seriously approach the creation of a comfortable and stylish site. After all, first of all, the site is designed for investors the worse and unattractive site, the less tokens they sell. If you want to sell your product, the site should be considered to the smallest detail.