[POOL] GigaRho Profit-Switching Multipool (Scrypt,x11,sha256,neoscrypt,blake2s)

[GigaRho]

Hey hoping that you could remove the cloudflare protection from the API page so I can add it to Awesome Miner Online Services tab and pull the profit estimates.

http://www.awesomeminer.com/help/onlineservices.aspx

Just made a change that should help. Depending on Awesome miner, the change may not be lenient enough, in which case let me know and I'll see about tuning it further to get it working properly.

Thank you for letting us know about this.

[1714851748]

1714851748

[1714851748]

1714851748

[whalesinc]

Working now thank you.

There is an error with the "actual 24hr" amount for x11.

Code:

{"name":"x11","port":5555,"coins":35,"fees":1,"hashrate":417683532690.112,"workers":31,"estimate_current":"0.00003249","estimate_last24h":"0.00002970","actual_last24h":"0.02930","hashrate_last24h":711375399784.3993}

"actual_last24h":"0.02930" would mean a single D3 could earn $6000 a day.... please double check these figures and ensure they are accurate and true. It should be BTC / GH .. i suspect your figure is BTC / TH ?

I've tried using the Profit Factor setting in Awesome Miner but it doesn't change anything. However this may be an AW issue so will contact them about it too.

Thank you.

[GigaRho]

Working now thank you.

There is an error with the "actual 24hr" amount for x11.

Code:

{"name":"x11","port":5555,"coins":35,"fees":1,"hashrate":417683532690.112,"workers":31,"estimate_current":"0.00003249","estimate_last24h":"0.00002970","actual_last24h":"0.02930","hashrate_last24h":711375399784.3993}

"actual_last24h":"0.02930" would mean a single D3 could earn $6000 a day.... please double check these figures and ensure they are accurate and true. It should be BTC / GH .. i suspect your figure is BTC / TH ?

I've tried using the Profit Factor setting in Awesome Miner but it doesn't change anything. However this may be an AW issue so will contact them about it too.

Thank you.

For the API, it seems x11 has the estimate pegged at BTC whereas the actual has it in mBTC. I'll see about getting that properly set soon.

When you say for the PF setting..."it doesn't change anything", what do you mean by that? There are a couple things I could tweak that may be of help.

Thanks

[MLS]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3188172.msg33028491#msg33028491

[GEBucky]

What is the API for the site for use on Awesome Miner? Been searching around and can't seem to find it. Thanks

[GigaRho]

What is the API for the site for use on Awesome Miner? Been searching around and can't seem to find it. Thanks

The site API information can be found at https://pool.gigarho.com/site/api . The actual url is a bit different depending on which function you are trying to get at.

[GEBucky]

What is the API for the site for use on Awesome Miner? Been searching around and can't seem to find it. Thanks

The site API information can be found at https://pool.gigarho.com/site/api . The actual url is a bit different depending on which function you are trying to get at.

Thanks - just trying to see if I can get the profit reporting to work. I think https://pool.gigarho.com/api/status it the right one assuming AM can parse the results for the correct algo. I will play around with it but if you have any suggestions for specific configurations of Online Services in AM would be much appreciated.

Thanks

[GEBucky]

What is the API for the site for use on Awesome Miner? Been searching around and can't seem to find it. Thanks

The site API information can be found at https://pool.gigarho.com/site/api . The actual url is a bit different depending on which function you are trying to get at.

Thanks - just trying to see if I can get the profit reporting to work. I think https://pool.gigarho.com/api/status it the right one assuming AM can parse the results for the correct algo. I will play around with it but if you have any suggestions for specific configurations of Online Services in AM would be much appreciated.

**** update **** worked like a charm. Just used the above URL and then put the algo into the API Identifier field.

Thanks

Oh, by the way, I was able to get AM working fine with my Antminers per you suggestion a few weeks ago. Trick is to disable the "Auto" privileged API function and just do each machine manually (or in bulk). The auto function keeps retrying and eventually freezes the rigs. All working great now. Now would love to get your sites profit estimates in there!

[GigaRho]

Oh, by the way, I was able to get AM working fine with my Antminers per you suggestion a few weeks ago. Trick is to disable the "Auto" privileged API function and just do each machine manually (or in bulk). The auto function keeps retrying and eventually freezes the rigs. All working great now. Now would love to get your sites profit estimates in there!

Ok, thanks for letting me know about that. From my trials, auto doesn't have the same effect, maybe its a difference in firmware version of the machine or something similar? At least that seems to work for you and your feedback gives me some info when referring AM to others.

[vegasguy]

HI, I also use awesome miner. Can you code your pool so that it works like the rest?

Vegas

[GigaRho]

HI, I also use awesome miner. Can you code your pool so that it works like the rest?

Vegas

Hello,

Would you mind elaborating more on what you are suggesting? (i.e. number format, API format, etc).

Thanks

[GEBucky]

HI, I also use awesome miner. Can you code your pool so that it works like the rest?

Vegas

Hello,

Would you mind elaborating more on what you are suggesting? (i.e. number format, API format, etc).

Thanks

I have a similar question. Your API using a different naming convention than YIMP (different tag name for algo) but it still works, you need to tell AM the name of the algo as it is shown in the return results for the API

Having a hard time determining whether to use current, Estimate, or actual. I have a few rigs that profit switch once a day based on profit of the pool. I was using estimate but your Scrypt just jumped to 0.02 which showed about $200/day per L3. Any advice on which is the best selection for this?

[GigaRho]

I have a similar question. Your API using a different naming convention than YIMP (different tag name for algo) but it still works, you need to tell AM the name of the algo as it is shown in the return results for the API

Having a hard time determining whether to use current, Estimate, or actual. I have a few rigs that profit switch once a day based on profit of the pool. I was using estimate but your Scrypt just jumped to 0.02 which showed about $200/day per L3. Any advice on which is the best selection for this?

We haven't done anything which should differentiate the naming convention of the algorithms that I am aware of, regardless I'll look into it for you.

Out of the different numbers to choose from, 24hr actual is the previous 24hrs so it is a decent idea of reality but does not anticipate the next 24hrs which is what you tend to want to look for with potential earnings. The current estimate is decent, but is an "in the moment" type of calculation, such as when the difficulty of finding a highly profitable coin exceeds normal standards.

As for the 24hr Estimate, it takes a lot into account and is usually a good determining factor to use (we normally exceed it for Scrypt in actual values), but today there was an issue with a particular coin's network that ramped up values beyond realistic, hence the .02 number you mentioned. Its a very rare occurrence that can happen, but disappears 24hrs after the instance took place and the 24hr estimate should stabilize back to normal at that point forward.

Thought I'd break it down a bit like above, but TLDR: Current Estimate >= 24hr estimate(on normal day) > 24hr actual

That is just my personal opinion, others may disagree in priority. There are a lot of factors that play into it and its hard to guess how luck is going to effect it.

[GEBucky]

I have a similar question. Your API using a different naming convention than YIMP (different tag name for algo) but it still works, you need to tell AM the name of the algo as it is shown in the return results for the API

Having a hard time determining whether to use current, Estimate, or actual. I have a few rigs that profit switch once a day based on profit of the pool. I was using estimate but your Scrypt just jumped to 0.02 which showed about $200/day per L3. Any advice on which is the best selection for this?

We haven't done anything which should differentiate the naming convention of the algorithms that I am aware of, regardless I'll look into it for you.

Out of the different numbers to choose from, 24hr actual is the previous 24hrs so it is a decent idea of reality but does not anticipate the next 24hrs which is what you tend to want to look for with potential earnings. The current estimate is decent, but is an "in the moment" type of calculation, such as when the difficulty of finding a highly profitable coin exceeds normal standards.

As for the 24hr Estimate, it takes a lot into account and is usually a good determining factor to use (we normally exceed it for Scrypt in actual values), but today there was an issue with a particular coin's network that ramped up values beyond realistic, hence the .02 number you mentioned. Its a very rare occurrence that can happen, but disappears 24hrs after the instance took place and the 24hr estimate should stabilize back to normal at that point forward.

Thought I'd break it down a bit like above, but TLDR: Current Estimate >= 24hr estimate(on normal day) > 24hr actual

That is just my personal opinion, others may disagree in priority. There are a lot of factors that play into it and its hard to guess how luck is going to effect it.

Thanks - that was helpful. I was using the 24 hour estimate but then saw to .02 swing and wasn't quite sure what was happening. That's my preferred.

My point on the the tags for your results I believe the standard Yimp tag is <AlgorigithmApiIdentifier> and looks like you are using "name". Doesn't matter, If you put the algo name in AM as returned by your api (i.e. scrypt) it figures it out just fine. But have to be sure to type the algo exactly as the api returns and it's case sensitive. Works great for me. Was a little bummed I wasn't making $220/day per L3+ though -that would have been nice

[GEBucky]

I just noticed something odd. I realize it takes awhile for earnings to mature. but I have been running at least 100Thz for 16 hours (was about 50thz prior 10 hours) and almost 400thz for the past 8. Was running two or 3 L3's on BTC prior to yesterday. My total confirmed and pending balance is only .0137 and I didn't have a payout at all yesterday on BTC.

1PdC8xS3fPDvGL8UgDQJJNYNttdynWgtwe

Interested to get your take. have been using the site for months but first time I have seen this much of a lag. Also first time I have taken hash up this high.

Thanks

[GigaRho]

I just noticed something odd. I realize it takes awhile for earnings to mature. but I have been running at least 100Thz for 16 hours (was about 50thz prior 10 hours) and almost 400thz for the past 8. Was running two or 3 L3's on BTC prior to yesterday. My total confirmed and pending balance is only .0137 and I didn't have a payout at all yesterday on BTC.

1PdC8xS3fPDvGL8UgDQJJNYNttdynWgtwe

Interested to get your take. have been using the site for months but first time I have seen this much of a lag. Also first time I have taken hash up this high.

Thanks

Hey again,

All found blocks usually take around 24 hours after they are found to mature/confirm/exchange, so in regards to your account...it seems around 4am EDT today you ramped up sha256 and around 6:30am EDT on scrypt (at least on the wallet address you linked). From what I can see, you are above the 0.005 BTC minimum for today's payout, so it should happen normally. The pending on these new miners should be confirmed about 24 hours after the two times I listed above for each of those machines respectively.

If I remember correctly, is this a second/different wallet address than you had used previously? I only see one miner on scrypt, where you said you had two or three running prior to yesterday. If that is the case, then each wallet address is handled separately for purposes of confirmation, payout, accounting, etc. I apologize if I misunderstood or am thinking of another person.

[GEBucky]

I just noticed something odd. I realize it takes awhile for earnings to mature. but I have been running at least 100Thz for 16 hours (was about 50thz prior 10 hours) and almost 400thz for the past 8. Was running two or 3 L3's on BTC prior to yesterday. My total confirmed and pending balance is only .0137 and I didn't have a payout at all yesterday on BTC.

1PdC8xS3fPDvGL8UgDQJJNYNttdynWgtwe

Interested to get your take. have been using the site for months but first time I have seen this much of a lag. Also first time I have taken hash up this high.

Thanks

Hey again,

All found blocks usually take around 24 hours after they are found to mature/confirm/exchange, so in regards to your account...it seems around 4am EDT today you ramped up sha256 and around 6:30am EDT on scrypt (at least on the wallet address you linked). From what I can see, you are above the 0.005 BTC minimum for today's payout, so it should happen normally. The pending on these new miners should be confirmed about 24 hours after the two times I listed above for each of those machines respectively.

If I remember correctly, is this a second/different wallet address than you had used previously? I only see one miner on scrypt, where you said you had two or three running prior to yesterday. If that is the case, then each wallet address is handled separately for purposes of confirmation, payout, accounting, etc. I apologize if I misunderstood or am thinking of another person.

You are correct - this is a different address than previous. I switch them occasionally. I rented a 1.7PH machine for a day but didn't seem to work so put it on MiningDutch and then moved a bunch of stuff here. The other L3's are on a Scrypt address, only 1 is on the above BTC.

thanks for clarifying

[massenzio77]

gigarho like never wanting to extract pink I appear litebitcoin? l address is right.possible to put it in place?

[GigaRho]

gigarho like never wanting to extract pink I appear litebitcoin? l address is right.possible to put it in place?

Yes, this should be possible. If you would like to post your wallet address here or open up a support ticket on the site, then we should be able to take care of that change for you.

[massenzio77]

 2KZPy24o9jFzLzCjG4aGnT7s8q7k7JFTk4  pink address