Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 06:07:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated]  (Read 76036 times)
tslimx
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10



View Profile
February 19, 2014, 09:27:59 PM
 #381

good job minorfart.
minerpart
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 10:43:27 PM
Last edit: February 19, 2014, 10:56:46 PM by minerpart
 #382

No problem tslimx.

I'm sure you know that threatening to go to someone's place of work to beat them up (or hold them hostage while you force them to hand over money or BTC to you) is illegal. So I would strongly advise you to not do that.
mainline
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 12:01:43 AM
 #383

When there's nothing to cool, air works just fine Smiley
bromide
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 20, 2014, 12:38:40 AM
 #384

Changelog 2014.02.19
  • Optimised for 1080p.
  • Increased readability
  • New rating system from A-F.
  • Rating criteria added
  • Criteria for promotion added [to be integrated]
  • Company movements as below as below
  • Lightning ASIC added

Company changes:
ASICMiner set    A+
Bitmain set    A. Promoted to A+ on continued good delivery times until March 15.
Bitfury set    A. Promoted to A+ if next generation is offered without preorder (delivery not required for promotion).
CoinTerra set    B+. Demoted to B as delivered products are not achieving hash rate (okay), but they are not compensating as of yet (not okay). Back to B+ if customers are compensated.
KNCMiner set    A. Demoted to B+ as Neptunes still not delivered, and refunds are coming up short. They're now making so much money with their private farm they don't need to care about the community. Promotion to A if refund issues are sorted out.
Black Arrow set B+. Demoted to B. Promotion to B+ if there are no more (new) issues until March 8.
Avalon set      B. Promoted to B+ due to successful delivery on new miner. Promotion to A if no issues until March 15.
HashFast set   C+. Promoted to B due to continued engagement in fixing issues. Promotion to B+ if no new issues until March 8.
AMT set       C. Promoted to B on delivery of first orders.
BitMine set      C. Promoted to C+ due to Zefir's involvement. Promotion to B on delivery of first orders.
VMC set         B. Demoted to E, refunds are being refused [ignored] and no products on the horizon. Potentially a scam. Promotion to D if refunds begin to be resolved.
BFL set       Z-. Promoted to F- if they give themselves into the authorities, or at least make an ATTEMPT to undo their wrongs.
Lightning ASIC added and set C. Promotion to B once more units are delivered successfully.

Drillbit set    B. Promotion to B+ if no issues until March 8.
Redhash set    B. Promotion to B+ if no issues until March 8.
Technobit set   B. Promotion to B+ if no issues until March 1.
Big Picture Mining set C+. Promotion to B if replacement units appear in the wild.
wasubii
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 20, 2014, 01:13:32 AM
 #385

Hi Ken,

Thanks for the update - things are getting pretty agitated on the thread.

How much capital did we lose in the first deal with eAsic? For the nExtreme 28nm that we have decided to bin?

Thanks,
Wasubii

We have not lost any as of this time.

Are we expected to lose any eventually? Is not losing any dependent on choosing them to design our custom 28nm? If we choose to go with someone other than eAsic then how much would we lose front he nExtreme NRE?

Thanks,
wasubii

We are working through this issue at the present time.

Do you seriously think your reply does anything to answer any of my questions? What a joke. Why even bother sending a reply like that. You could have just sent a blank message instead. You have a serious transparency problem - it does you no favours at all when the whole community is screaming 'Scam' and you continue with business as usual, just throw out the tiny tidbits of information i feel like.


Unsurprisingly, no reply since then...
VolanicEruptor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 04:53:13 AM
 #386

When there's nothing to cool, air works just fine Smiley

Our New Zero Watt Strategy and the implementation of Invisihash will be a Big Game Changer.  If Bitcoin shoots up to $100,000 then I think we have a real chance at dominating this Industry.

sporket
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 21, 2014, 02:36:04 PM
 #387

(Posting this here, got deleted from the censored thread.)

LOL... Can you all please stop deleting and reposting all those images? It keeps on bumping this thread with no new information in it.

Knowing that your fate is sealed and nothing can be done to change it is... It's emotionally crippling.  I'm helping these "shareholders" by giving them a purpose, a target for their anger, and some busywork (deleting my posts) to keep them occupied.  As a bonus, working towards a common cause instills camaraderie.

This sort of thing is crucial for morale during disasters like this one.
oaxaca
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 671
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 24, 2014, 08:08:38 PM
 #388



OK guys, you got me Sad
I will now stop posting on this forum.

Before you go, how about deleting the hundreds of shit-for-brains feedback entries on this forum.

Well?  how about it?
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 05:32:56 AM
 #389

Ken is even deleting posts from the VMC thread in custom hardware.

I didn't realize that one was self-moderated too.

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
Virtual Mining Corporation 02/27/14
 
Virtual Mining is currently processing and confirming pre-order refund requests. It is a very timely process because we are in the final stages of configuration before all of our pre-orders are shipped. Look to your email for product shipping order schedule. At the current time we are not immediately moving every order to a refund status due to our final staging and rigging our products for shipping.
 
We are contacting all of our valued customers with pre-orders  with our new product specification details that includes an increase in hashing power.  This increase in hashing power will make up for our delay in shipping.  Should any of our customers still wish to receive a refund even with the increase in hashing power please contact our customer service department.
 
Thank you for your continued patience and good luck on your Mining Ventures
 

Wow!  You are going to fufill existing orders with 10x the hashrate?  That is the only way you could make up for the delay in shipping.  Actually 10x might be less than needed to compensate.  A LOT LESS.

Is your "processing and confirming refund requests" similar to your processing of share trading?  What has it been, 4 months now that you have bullshitted your investors into thinking they will be able to trade again?

I doubt your customers are stupid enough to wait for the bankruptcy filing like MtGox's victims did.
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 05:47:11 PM
 #390

Ken is even deleting posts from the VMC thread in custom hardware.

I didn't realize that one was self-moderated too.

That's why i have created this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=253282.0

V2Rocket
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 04:13:45 PM
 #391


Lol, Ken tells random reporters more than he tells U:

"On Monday, several bitcoin companies announced that Japan-based Mt. Gox, the largest online Bitcoin exchange, would file for bankruptcy after months of technological problems and an apparent major theft. It did so Friday, saying that hackers had stolen 750,000 of its users’ bitcoins and 100,000 of its own — more than six percent of the total currently in circulation, worth more than $450 million.

The announcement prompted the cancellation of Virtual Mining’s development of the 55 nanometer chips, Slaughter said on Tuesday.

The cancellation, he said, was driven by three factors. First, Active Mining had some bitcoins — now presumed lost — in the exchange. Second, the recent decline in the price of Bitcoin meant the company had less buying power. Third, the machines would cost enough to produce that they would only provide a return on investment if the price of Bitcoin was at least $900.
"

Lol.  

Excuse Du Jour:  UR coinz are GOXED!!!!1!
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 04:41:11 PM
 #392

LOL. 1/2 a million dollars on masks wasted.  Plus whatever he paid for the design in the first place.

If he actually taped out like he claimed.

There is no way he has enough money left to fund a 28 nm build.  Especially with 4 employees, all members of his family (as stated in the article).
lobbes
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 240
Merit: 101



View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:07:49 PM
 #393

It is worth mentioning that this question was asked to Ken in the official thread, with no response.

I assume no bitcoins on MtGox either Ken?
+1, i just want to ask the same question

Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:17:41 PM
 #394

It is worth mentioning that this question was asked to Ken in the official thread, with no response.

I assume no bitcoins on MtGox either Ken?
+1, i just want to ask the same question

One wonders why he would be storing bitcoins anywhere but offline after losing 106 at Weex.  More so, why he would keep any at MtGox.  Since it was impossible to get cash out of MtGox on a timely basis since the time of his IPO, you'd have to be an idiot to consider selling coins for your business there.

It seems this could be the perfect cover for Ken to walk away from the scam free and clear.  Cancelling the 55 nm pushes the time frame for any results out 6-12 months.  And when anyone asks where the money went, he can just blame MtGox.
klondike_bar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:28:23 PM
 #395

^if thats true, then holy shit. 55nm out the window, and the recently announced 28nm is probably barely off the ground.

but more importantly: why would they store bitcoins at mt. Gox? that is absoulely insane, and more then enough reason to avoid ACTM if they cant implement a simple offline storage

24" PCI-E cables with 16AWG wires and stripped ends - great for server PSU mods, best prices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563461
No longer a wannabe - now an ASIC owner!
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:32:51 PM
 #396

^if thats true, then holy shit. 55nm out the window, and the recently announced 28nm is probably barely off the ground.

but more importantly: why would they store bitcoins at mt. Gox? that is absoulely insane, and more then enough reason to avoid ACTM if they cant implement a simple offline storage

We can expect the 28nm in September perhaps? Not sure why any coin was on MtGox, coinbase is the prefered place for getting in/out of bitcoin and also Gox has had issues with withdrawing for the entire life of ActiveMining.

This makes no sense to me.
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:49:10 PM
 #397

^if thats true, then holy shit. 55nm out the window, and the recently announced 28nm is probably barely off the ground.

but more importantly: why would they store bitcoins at mt. Gox? that is absoulely insane, and more then enough reason to avoid ACTM if they cant implement a simple offline storage

We can expect the 28nm in September perhaps? Not sure why any coin was on MtGox, coinbase is the prefered place for getting in/out of bitcoin and also Gox has had issues with withdrawing for the entire life of ActiveMining.

This makes no sense to me.

Do you remember when I told you to take legal action so you could prevent Ken from turning any more of your money into garbage?

Well here we are, $1M in expenses, 4 months of salary for Ken and his children later.  Do you still think I was giving you bad advice?
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 05:55:49 PM
 #398

^if thats true, then holy shit. 55nm out the window, and the recently announced 28nm is probably barely off the ground.

but more importantly: why would they store bitcoins at mt. Gox? that is absoulely insane, and more then enough reason to avoid ACTM if they cant implement a simple offline storage

We can expect the 28nm in September perhaps? Not sure why any coin was on MtGox, coinbase is the prefered place for getting in/out of bitcoin and also Gox has had issues with withdrawing for the entire life of ActiveMining.

This makes no sense to me.

Do you remember when I told you to take legal action so you could prevent Ken from turning any more of your money into garbage?

Well here we are, $1M in expenses, 4 months of salary for Ken and his children later.  Do you still think I was giving you bad advice?

I still think your advice was bad.

My view has been like this for a long time now; the investors have nothing, the company is worth zilch. However I believed there to be a small (1-4%) chance that Ken makes an ASIC and this would be the only way to get a real return. Taking that risk was the only real way to get a decent amount of Bitcoin back, rather than the peanuts splitting $1,000,000 (if that) over 10,000,000 shares.

Of course this means I was willing to accept a 95%++ chance of never getting anything back.

This direction is the 95%++ chance playing out.
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 06:28:26 PM
 #399

^if thats true, then holy shit. 55nm out the window, and the recently announced 28nm is probably barely off the ground.

but more importantly: why would they store bitcoins at mt. Gox? that is absoulely insane, and more then enough reason to avoid ACTM if they cant implement a simple offline storage

It would be fun to watch him try a third IPO, to "complete the 28nm ASIC project."  After all, there's no way in hell he has the money for it now, and ActM "investors" just love that type of crap.

Edit @drawingthesun:  It is heartbreaking watching you ignore the sound advice *repeatedly* offered you by *numerous* intelligent people.  Heartbreaking.

I already made the mistake of investing. I was left with two options with various risk/reward playouts:

1) Legally force the company to liquidize. I will perhaps get under 1 bitcoin back for all that I have invested after the legal fees are paid out. 95% - 99% chance of working.

2) Let Ken have his way, give him the chance to return to investors 20% - 90% of our original invested amounts over several years. We never break even but have bitcoin in our wallets. 0.5% - 5% chance of working.

I still think that taking option 2 was the best course of action. Yeah it's like playing a lottery. I don't care so much for folding and getting 1 bitcoin.
V2Rocket
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 02, 2014, 06:36:35 PM
 #400

No.
You made a series of mistakes, failing to listen to your betters at *each and every step of the way*.  You stubbornly ignored good advice, and, even now, are trying to justify your bad decisions.

It is people like you, who throw money at lulzy, illiterate, serial-scamming alcoholics, and then sculk off with tails between their legs, who are *directly responsible for all the scamming happening in Bitcoin*.

You don't report rapists in hopes of getting unraped.  You report them so they would be punished and *others would not get raped*.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!