|
Ashitank
|
 |
October 29, 2013, 07:58:12 AM |
|
I say we read that with a grain of salt and wait for other canaries to test the firmware before us.
I told you guys as someone that's a veteran pro to R&D that these miners are prototypes. Some poor miners chasing 10-30GH/s sometimes end up bricking a unit in the process like that poor guy czz in the CH forum whose problems began immediately after .97 was launched and he installed it coincidentally.
He has lost completely unrecoverable hashing time and hashrate in the process. He will likely never reach ROI unless he can take advantage of arbitrage, somehow. I wish that I could've helped him further.
Let's not be the canary in the coal mine (AKA first to install), until we see that the first canaries haven't died.
Yes Boss  |
|
|
|
|
|
Ashitank
|
|
October 29, 2013, 02:47:47 PM |
|
24 Hour BTC 0.55153800   |
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 29, 2013, 04:05:14 PM |
|
You are looking at short term variance, and I didn't notice anyone commenting when the 24 hour earnings hit 1.32 BTC.
What you need to look at is 21 days hashing and 22.38 BTC earned. = 1.07 BTC/day.
-R-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashitank
|
|
October 29, 2013, 04:38:50 PM |
|
Yeah both are running .97 smooth.
Im not going to touch .97 with a 10ft pole until I determine weather or not it had a hand in me having a large issue with a non-GB jupiter.
How long does it take to revert back to 0.95 firmware which was when we hit 1.32 BTC in 24 hours , 3 mins or 5 mins of restart time ? |
|
|
|
|
|
firsttimeuser
|
|
October 29, 2013, 04:56:45 PM |
|
Yeah both are running .97 smooth.
Im not going to touch .97 with a 10ft pole until I determine weather or not it had a hand in me having a large issue with a non-GB jupiter.
How long does it take to revert back to 0.95 firmware which was when we hit 1.32 BTC in 24 hours , 3 mins or 5 mins of restart time ? Could you please stop that ^"nonsense"? P.S. Yes, I know Jupiters hash rate slowed down a little.. |
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 29, 2013, 05:07:20 PM |
|
After testing on my machines, we moved to 0.98 firmware. It seems to have produced a nice bump up in hashrate - no way to actually tell what the effect was until it stabilizes (in several hours) but so far it looks promising.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashitank
|
|
October 29, 2013, 06:40:04 PM |
|
After testing on my machines, we moved to 0.98 firmware. It seems to have produced a nice bump up in hashrate - no way to actually tell what the effect was until it stabilizes (in several hours) but so far it looks promising.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
So far looks Solid : Worker 1 Hash Rate 281.444 Gh/s Worker 2 Hash Rate 283.277 Gh/s I am really sorry for bitching all the time , but a stupid firmware causing us loose BTC was hard for me to swallow , please forgive me Your way of handling this group buy is clear example to your future group buy investors & as per me you all doing excellent job , Thank you Redacted , Thomas_s , DyslexicZombei & Bobsag3. |
|
|
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
|
October 29, 2013, 06:46:46 PM |
|
 Caught them both doing over 600 on the 5s! |
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 29, 2013, 06:54:23 PM |
|
And we're now doing 560+ at the pool, which is quite an improvement. It's still a little early to be able to see much, but the BTCG daily hashrate chart has curved upwards since the firmware upgrade.  |
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8827
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
October 29, 2013, 06:57:04 PM |
|
And we're now doing 560+ at the pool, which is quite an improvement. It's still a little early to be able to see much, but the BTCG daily hashrate chart has curved upwards since the firmware upgrade... THOSE are nice numbers 560 plus |
|
|
|
|
bobsag3
|
|
October 29, 2013, 07:24:23 PM |
|
And we're now doing 560+ at the pool, which is quite an improvement. It's still a little early to be able to see much, but the BTCG daily hashrate chart has curved upwards since the firmware upgrade... THOSE are nice numbers 560 plus I feed the machines some speed every morning. Keeps em going |
|
|
|
|
|
thomas_s
|
|
October 29, 2013, 07:27:14 PM |
|
And we're now doing 560+ at the pool, which is quite an improvement. It's still a little early to be able to see much, but the BTCG daily hashrate chart has curved upwards since the firmware upgrade... THOSE are nice numbers 560 plus I feed the machines some speed every morning. Keeps em going YoU SciencED? |
|
|
|
|
drduck
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
October 29, 2013, 07:42:26 PM |
|
And we're now doing 560+ at the pool, which is quite an improvement. It's still a little early to be able to see much, but the BTCG daily hashrate chart has curved upwards since the firmware upgrade... THOSE are nice numbers 560 plus I feed the machines some speed every morning. Keeps em going YoU SciencED? Science that bitch! |
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 29, 2013, 08:48:44 PM |
|
Machines are at 570+ on the pool...
WORKER 1 HASH RATE 289.233 Gh/s
WORKER 2 HASH RATE 282.972 Gh/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
mootinator
|
|
October 29, 2013, 10:00:06 PM |
|
Machines are at 570+ on the pool...
WORKER 1 HASH RATE 289.233 Gh/s
WORKER 2 HASH RATE 282.972 Gh/s
I just noticed this and decided it was necessary to make a giddy post about it. So, here it is: \o/ Sucks that the firmware was responsible for the problem, but at least it's nice for the long term that it wasn't hardware. |
No
|
|
|
2weiX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1005
this space intentionally left blank
|
|
October 30, 2013, 05:13:30 PM |
|
reverted back to .96.1 and smoothing it out at 500+ now.
i only wish they'd release a firmware really pushing it to 550 and higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Redacted-
|
|
October 30, 2013, 05:18:29 PM |
|
Which group buy are we talking about here, exactly? Or was your post really meant for somewhere else?
I'll start working on the next dividend payment tomorrow night.
In USD $$ terms, we're better than 60% of the way to a positive ROI in R5 and R6 after hashing for 22 days...
|
|
|
|
|
|
thomas_s
|
|
October 30, 2013, 05:31:43 PM |
|
reverted back to .96.1 and smoothing it out at 500+ now.
i only wish they'd release a firmware really pushing it to 550 and higher.
289+283 = 572 > 550  |
|
|
|
|
|
mootinator
|
|
October 31, 2013, 01:34:29 AM |
|
BTC0.97+ in 24 hours? I assumed we'd never see that again.
|
No
|
|
|
|
Miramyn
|
|
October 31, 2013, 02:02:21 AM |
|
BTC0.97+ in 24 hours? I assumed we'd never see that again. Yeah that's a very pleasant surprise |
When I was younger we didn't have behavioural disorders. They called it "being a brat". It was as simple as that!
|
|
|
|
