[ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net

[tigerbit]

Does anyone have the Cairnsmore CM1 bitstream handy?

Can you provide a download link?

The Dropbox download link in the Readme.txt just 404s..

Bit late to the party, but I've only just revisited the mining scene after retiring from Bitcoin years ago to find out the three "obsolescent" CM1s boxed up under my desk potentially have life in them yet!  LOL.

[sidgrip]

Does anyone have the Cairnsmore CM1 bitstream handy?

Can you provide a download link?

The Dropbox download link in the Readme.txt just 404s..

Bit late to the party, but I've only just revisited the mining scene after retiring from Bitcoin years ago to find out the three "obsolescent" CM1s boxed up under my desk potentially have life in them yet!  LOL.

Here you go sir.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9_C2MdBMSAxWkxoQ0N5OGJmcVE/view?usp=sharing

 

[Coin_trader]

if you want this OP to be translated into Filipino, i can do the job.

[mogrith]

let me know if you have any luck I have one with the bitstream uploaded but can't seem to get my PC to talk to it.

had one working on a different pc.

Does anyone have the Cairnsmore CM1 bitstream handy?

Can you provide a download link?

The Dropbox download link in the Readme.txt just 404s..

Bit late to the party, but I've only just revisited the mining scene after retiring from Bitcoin years ago to find out the three "obsolescent" CM1s boxed up under my desk potentially have life in them yet!  LOL.

Here you go sir.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9_C2MdBMSAxWkxoQ0N5OGJmcVE/view?usp=sharing

 

[BlueDragon747]

some wild traffic on internet atm(Mirai botnet?)

auto admin is working sweet but blocking about 2-3 new attacks on new connections not already blocked every second per server  

also note that there are DNS issues too due to an DDoS attack on Dyn so if you having real problems doing lookups try OpenDNS

Code:

208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220

will be keeping an eye open for future issues/news/countermeasures

right now it looks like we are in a storm so expect some issues and if you spot something down let me know!!  

[Khaan.jamil010]

I like this kinds of Coins as well look much nice.....

[BlueDragon747]

working on eu3 making some updates may take awhile

[luvbeening]

i just withdraw some blc from bittrex to my client wallet,seems like bittrex has done the transaction with txid but it didn`t show in my wallet..so i try to check with explorer and none of the explorer works atm?

[MarSas]

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

I see this one does not function as well.

[BlueDragon747]

bittrex transactions take awhile they gen the tx before it is announced on network same for pretty much all coins on there

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

if tx is not yet showing you might need to wait longer for bittrex to actually announce it to the network once thats done should be pretty quick to get included in a block

edit:
seems to function for basic stuff like tx/block etc fine what issues are you getting?

[luvbeening]

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

i did try that with key in the txid from bittrex and end up with nothing,and this explorer seems crap for there is no way to check with wallet address

[BlueDragon747]

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

i did try that with key in the txid from bittrex and end up with nothing,and this explorer seems crap for there is no way to check with wallet address

how long ago did you do this?

bittrex status: Delayed   BLC   485377   1   33 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:43:36 GMT+0100

so like I said doubt its been announced on network e.g if bittrex txid is not showing its not been announced on network = wait next time they update connection it should be announced then!

edit:

bittrex status: Normal   BLC   485389   1   3 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:48:46 GMT+0100

check your txid now does it show is it also showing in your wallet?

[luvbeening]

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

i did try that with key in the txid from bittrex and end up with nothing,and this explorer seems crap for there is no way to check with wallet address

how long ago did you do this?

bittrex status: Delayed   BLC   485377   1   33 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:43:36 GMT+0100

so like I said doubt its been announced on network e.g if bittrex txid is not showing its not been announced on network = wait next time they update connection it should be announced then!

edit:

bittrex status: Normal   BLC   485389   1   3 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:48:46 GMT+0100

check your txid now does it show is it also showing in your wallet?

yes..it shows now..thank you.
tbh i never experience the situation like this before.. if bittrex shows transaction status completed and coins didn`t show up for more than 20 mins..i have to think of some others reason right?

[BlueDragon747]

https://blakecoin.org/blakecoin-explorer/

i did try that with key in the txid from bittrex and end up with nothing,and this explorer seems crap for there is no way to check with wallet address

how long ago did you do this?

bittrex status: Delayed   BLC   485377   1   33 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:43:36 GMT+0100

so like I said doubt its been announced on network e.g if bittrex txid is not showing its not been announced on network = wait next time they update connection it should be announced then!

edit:

bittrex status: Normal   BLC   485389   1   3 minutes   Sun Oct 23 2016 10:48:46 GMT+0100

check your txid now does it show is it also showing in your wallet?

yes..it shows now..thank you.
tbh i never experience the situation like this before.. if bittrex shows transaction status completed and coins didn`t show up for more than 20 mins..i have to think of some others reason right?

bittrex have a lot of coins and their system tends to delay some so this can happen not just to BLC best to check status for wallet

cant hurt to ask I am often about it could have been a sign of network issues

Note:
other explorers are very low priority atm just working on latest wallet based on core 0.13 then back to game dev not sure about spending time working on something like insight/cce maybe/maybe not  

so basic/crap explorers for now until I or others have time to do some work on a full merge(blc,pho,bbtc,elt,umo,lit) explorers

[BlueDragon747]

what happened to blc.cryptocoinexplorer.com ?
seems i saw it live not long ago.

http://www.cryptocoinexplorer.com/sponsor

personally I think its expensive these days especially if you look at 6x sponsor fee per year for all the merged

at some point I will get a server for the explorers and it will most likely be at blakecoin.com its just very low priority for me and adds more costs *far less than a hosted service though and for all merged

[cinnamon_carter]

i suppose if we really need explorers i can get off my ass and start working

[sidgrip]

i suppose if we really need explorers i can get off my ass and start working

Anything that helps to move the Blake256 family further along would be awesome 

 

[dbt1033]

Will 2017 be the year for Blake?  Still here, thanks team.

[BlueDragon747]

not in 2017 yet hope to have some releases before then  

been taking some time with wallet as 13/13.1 are not great with segwit imho, 11/12 are better and been looking at the zcash code too (so atm have 3 versions that could be next release but doing testing looking for most stable)

also been integrating some optimizations for blake256 (sse2,sse3,sse4.1,avx,avx2) which have been on my todo list for awhile, atm hard define for which version but cpu detect and select at compile time would be best, non x86 versions like neon are still on list not yet done for 8 rounds so for something like Arm cpu will fallback to current sphlib version  

performance benchmark example on Intel i7 4c/8t

sphlib
#2048    11.84 cpb
#4096    11.58 cpb
#long     11.33 cpb

sse2
#2048    4.82 cpb
#4096    4.70 cpb
#long     4.57 cpb

sse4.1
#2048    3.61 cpb
#4096    3.51 cpb
#long     3.40 cpb

cpb = (cpu) cycles per byte *lower the better

avx/avx2 require assembly code which makes compiling harder (nasm/yasm) so wip on those

[dbt1033]

not in 2017 yet hope to have some releases before then  

been taking some time with wallet as 13/13.1 are not great with segwit imho, 11/12 are better and been looking at the zcash code too (so atm have 3 versions that could be next release but doing testing looking for most stable)

also been integrating some optimizations for blake256 (sse2,sse3,sse4.1,avx,avx2) which have been on my todo list for awhile, atm hard define for which version but cpu detect and select at compile time would be best, non x86 versions like neon are still on list not yet done for 8 rounds so for something like Arm cpu will fallback to current sphlib version  

performance benchmark example on Intel i7 4c/8t

sphlib
#2048    11.84 cpb
#4096    11.58 cpb
#long     11.33 cpb

sse2
#2048    4.82 cpb
#4096    4.70 cpb
#long     4.57 cpb

sse4.1
#2048    3.61 cpb
#4096    3.51 cpb
#long     3.40 cpb

cpb = (cpu) cycles per byte *lower the better

avx/avx2 require assembly code which makes compiling harder (nasm/yasm) so wip on those

LOL, sounds good bud.  Will be nice to see people hyped about blake