Bounty and too many participants

[annmhie0904]

yes, agree. there are too many participants for bounties. maybe they should think regarding the qualifications in the bounties. like first 200 members only. 200 participants is way too many to spread the words of the project. That was my opinion.

[1715014656]

1715014656

[1715014656]

1715014656

[1715014656]

1715014656

[cryptomorphines]

The bounty managers will limit the participants of  course in the future if the participants are too much,especially those high ranking accounts these accounts are getting most of the stakes with less efforts and those low ranks like us wont get any good bounties,the managers should have some tiers like what bountyhive has so that there will be equality in the bounties.

[Olega252]

Yes it is right, people at a forum became in tens times more, in comparison with previous year, have to toughen rules of participation who just will do these to generosity, and about them forgotten, or to make careful, tough selection on these generosity

[Spaffin]

ya you are absolutely correct as because more and more people are joining the bounty there should be some regulations.

In fact, the new signers of the campaign have already been cut off by the introduced rules about the need to have a certain amount of merit before proceeding to the next rank for the opportunity to get more tokens in the signature campaign. Virtually without merit, you can achieve a junior member. To get the rank of the participant you need to have ten merits already, and this is a big problem since no good reports you write, it is unlikely that someone will send you the merits. And to the rank of a full participant in general it is not really possible to reach even in a few years. Therefore, in the near future it is unlikely that the company's signature plots will become much larger than now. Who by this time managed to get the highest ranks, he now wins considerably.

[CryptRoller]

I like the way Bountyhive manages the participants. Their way makes it more transparent whih part of the bounty is shared for each tier.

[maereglapo]

Merit system really helps the bounty hunters,especially when these shit posters are doing spam posts to get faster rank ups here,their main aim is to participate signature campaigns,the merit system really fucked up these people because they wont rank up without the required merit that is why in the future the participants from the signatures will be less,because the demands are higher more projects are coming in.

high demands means higher rewards.

[cryptobobo]

Bounty managers will find a better way to have more reliable bounty rewards,might be agood idea if they copy the bountyhive's system which will limit particpants from getting most of the stakes,because today higher ranks will always have advantages especially in the signature campaigns and those low rank profiles wont have much stakes.

[andiko]

I think that managers need to gradually limit the number of participants and introduce KYC. This will help more or less avoid multiple accounts

[Idrisu]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

What you are saying is that more people are coming to knowllege that they can actually participate in the ico and make money and some prefer to do this instead of investing into the ico itself? I think the project manager prefer to get more people for their bounty program than just get few that cannot really take the projects to potential investors.

[Congyang]

Bounty managers will find a better way to have more reliable bounty rewards,might be agood idea if they copy the bountyhive's system which will limit particpants from getting most of the stakes,because today higher ranks will always have advantages especially in the signature campaigns and those low rank profiles wont have much stakes.

yes if the manager has such an idea to make restrictions on participants like using a bountyhive portal would be very beneficial. because we can control the number of participants and of course the reward will be great if there are restrictions on participants.

[mariangpalad]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Limiting the numbers of participants would be better,so there will be a first come first serve basis,or there will be some tier for the rewards just like what bountyhive has,so that there will be an equal split for the high ranks and low rank bounty hunters especially in signature campaigns here in bitcointalk because now its too unfair for the lower ranks.

[Elseye]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It's unavoidable, my friend. Number of profit-hunting people in crypto grows with every day. However for me it is still possible to find good campaigns with a decent number of participants.

[Azazana]

I was upset at first when i have only 10 merits.But now I understand that this is a good scheme to defend forum  and bounty from
locusts

[Profuter]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that soon in the companys of Twitter and Facebook will be meaningless to participate, because a lot of people began to participate in them.

[Azazana]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I like few managers,who set strict rules for media campaigns.I do not want to share my tokens with lazy people and scammers

[contactmike1]

Well, some managers restrict amount of participants, what is more, they adjust merit system and take higher ranks in social bounties. From the point of view of ICO holder, more participants mean higher brand awareness for the same price.

[Azazana]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that soon in the companys of Twitter and Facebook will be meaningless to participate, because a lot of people began to participate in them.

for the last few campaigns I got 5-10 times less tokens in socials then in media.If you want good profit,you need to do not only socails

[peleng]

Well, some managers restrict amount of participants, what is more, they adjust merit system and take higher ranks in social bounties. From the point of view of ICO holder, more participants mean higher brand awareness for the same price.

I agree, there will simply be a tightening of the rules of bounty campaigns. To participate in the bounty campaign, the minimum requirements for participants will be raised, for example Jr. Member can no longer participate in bounty campaigns. All this will lead to the fact that the organizers of ICO will get better promotion of their project.

[ene1980]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

What is your over all assessment ,do you think you want to ban bounty or you wanted to ban people just to sit here and collect bounties,i am sure there will be a time when we wont see new projects with the regulations coming up,so your problem will be sorted out by then. Do not be greedy enough,if you wanted to participate just do that,this is not a place to earn ,if you keep that in mind there wont be any confusion.

[SpringfieldM1A]

Merit system really helps the bounty hunters,especially when these shit posters are doing spam posts to get faster rank ups here,their main aim is to participate signature campaigns,the merit system really fucked up these people because they wont rank up without the required merit that is why in the future the participants from the signatures will be less,because the demands are higher more projects are coming in.

high demands means higher rewards.

That be true and luckily, merit system is pretty established right now... You can't fake merits, if you do, you get negative trust like this fella:

This is so very timely now. Bounty is also starting to become famous because even investors are joining to earn free more coins. It would be in favor of the project than to participants. It does not matter to me as long as I get paid for what I have worked for. Maybe soon it will be regulated.

It's good that people like this are getting what they deserve. You can not join in a bounty with a negative trust.

Yes, there are too many people joining in but if you are old, you get your reward. (Is it just me or does this rhyme?)