Bounty and too many participants

[Sam$oN]

Afraid of healthy competition rather silly. More people are more interested. Or are you afraid that the freebie will be covered? It was never a freebie, it was a paid job.

[aqrulesms]

for last time is unreally to make money from social media bounty because sometimes its about 5000-6000 parcipants in twitter and after 2 months of hard job you get only 10-15$

[talkingblack]

I am already working on this, but it is very difficult to choose just fair participants, I think the system can be best performed this way.

[ohkkstaaahp]

Yes, many ICO projects are open today, and many have joined their Bounty program. But many ICO projects are deceptive, poor quality. Many people did not get tokens after the end of the project, they lost the effort and time in these cases.

[Portia12]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes you are right that the bounty program is becoming popular nowadays,
And there are so many participants who are joining it ,
But I don't really think that some investors would just choose to join instead of investing for example I am an investor of course if I really like the project and I think it would be successful and I would gain a profit from it then why wouldn't I invest in it? Why would I settle with just a bounty reward when I could buy some in their ICO,
And also bounty regulation would never happen maybe a KYC in other bounty but to only accept the best participants I don't think that it would happen,
Maybe they could limit their participants number but not choose only the best.

[loung3e]

I think in future we will be hard regulated because a lot of people make not good video
we have noticed that in some projects we have almost half of project or more participants which are with status declined

[hope2907]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

If bounty campaigns will be more rules maybe it will be not bad but I think for managers of the project, the more participants the better. And the fact that each individual participant receives less is not so important for them

[trang1188]

i think bounty campaign is very good,they can introduce product to everyone throught participants,it is the same marketing,but bounty is fix depend each ico so many ppl join campaign,each ppl get less coin

[Radzivill]

Yes, there were a lot of participants, unfortunately. Therefore, I try to choose less popular managers than before. This is certainly a higher risk, but the reward will be greater!

[Aimee1993]

The work of Bounty is very good for the reward, but the risk is also  very large, resulting in a lot of fraudulent ICO projects are running.
There are too many participants, but i don't think this is the main reason.

[jtbcoins]

I don't know if you are right. Most of people participated in twitter and facebook bounties, maybe articles. But for me signature campaigns always will be profitable.

[Michail.]

With the introduction of merit for beginners, it is difficult to raise their rating, so low payments, due to the large number of bounty participants, I believe that only affect Newbie and Jr. Member.

[conanmori]

As we already got many participants on Bounty and we recieve less pay. We cant really avoid it and putting some rules and choosing best participants are not good option since we cant hardly identify who is the best on promoting. We just need to find some good bounty the got high allocation so even so many participant we can still get more profit than others.

[sherenikaw]

It's difficult to find the best ICO or the best gift campaign today
because there are only a few people who can feel the best from others.
in my opinion it is better to share blessings to others,
we work hard in achieving higher rankings and learn how we can make a good profit in bounty campaign.

[Boristhecat]

Yes, there were a lot of participants, unfortunately. Therefore, I try to choose less popular managers than before. This is certainly a higher risk, but the reward will be greater!

Excellent strategy, in addition, you can choose those bounty managers who set limits on the number of participants.

[Redhead5]

As we already got many participants on Bounty and we recieve less pay. We cant really avoid it and putting some rules and choosing best participants are not good option since we cant hardly identify who is the best on promoting. We just need to find some good bounty the got high allocation so even so many participant we can still get more profit than others.

I agree. In other words some of the bounty campaign has declared a limit numbers of participants to participate the campaign. As long as the limit not yet full we cant avoid any bounty hunters to joined to. And besides each campaign were declared percentage allocation. The more the bounty hunters participated the campaign the more the ICO projects promoted and the great chances for a project would success even if we get lesser pay but at least successful and get paid.

[ANENOOB]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

yeah, a lot of participants that's mean less rewards. i think every bounty manager should to add the new rules for a limit participant. especially for social media which i see always continue to grow.

[Ryanpogi]

It's sad to see that as many as participating in the bounty campaign are fewer than you can get. It's a good thing if you're small enough to make your heart grow after the bounty campaign. thanks ..

[madushanperis11]

There are a lot of new comers for the bounty programs and most of them start with facebook and twitter. I have no obligation new comers coming to field, but bounty managers should have a mechanism to limit the number of participants according to their requirements, otherwise nobody gets a reward for what they do.

[Jupeter]

social media campaign become crowded because of social media campaign itself. many participants are promoting ICO using facebook and twitter. their friends see it so they get the interest of those people.

It is really normal that many people is supporting and participating on bounty campaigns, because there are too many bounty campaign right now, and a lot of people is also earning a good profit with bounty, and people like to participate on bounty because it is one a of th3 good way to have money.