The longer the bounty, the fewer the earnings?

[banks38]

I find the longer the bounty goes for and the more hoops they make you jump through to participate the higher rate of failure.  The nice simple bounties always seem to pay the best.  Anyone else seeing this?

[1714995854]

1714995854

[1714995854]

1714995854

[1714995854]

1714995854

[camelson]

Length of the bounty campaign is directly proportional to number of tokens. usually people looses interest in longer bounty campaign. It is also very time consuming. Best option is to participate in media campaign and try to avoid signature campaign, if the reward is good then join the campaign is last few weeks. I usually avoid bounty campaigns longer than 6 weeks.

[trinhvanthang5]

The longer the bonus, the more participants and the money will decrease, I usually join the bounty that 2 months or less, and you do, the less valuable you have!

[daedalus8]

hmmm its depend on how much their allocation token and it value market

[CoinFoxs]

That is correct. You have to calculate how much you get from a week's work.
If the bounty duration is very long and the reward is similar to a much shorter one, why would you take the longer one?
Another disadvantage of long bounty is that you risk more time if it is a scam.

It happens mostly but in few projects this is not right because they need more time to launch and complete their product in the market because they are introducing something innovative so the require more time but this happens in very few cases.

[lena1]

This is not quite true statement, because if the pool did not change then the payment will be the same, the main thing is that the rank was bigger!

[Bronenosec]

depending on the project , there are different situations . sometimes the project pays for 2 weeks more than that project that goes more than 3 months

[biksa]

Just at that moment when ICO are prolonged, such as your friend is leaving campaign, leaving coins that he will not receive for those who stayed and continued to make bounty before completion. The fewer participants - the more tokens will get to each, it's logical. Who knows how to wait and comes to work systematically - gets a good reward.

[Wayan_Pedjeng]

In the bounty section you can find some campaigns going on for more than 6 months. I don't understand the point in participating in such campaigns. Anyway, why do they need such a lengthy campaign? If the investors are not interested, then they should rather declare that the ICO has failed.

In my personal experience was a bounty, which was about 6 months, and 2 months spent on payments - and it is very profitable to show itself. So even long-term companies are very profitable, but the risk of losing time is certainly high

In this case, you were lucky. But what happens if the ICO fails or turns out that it was a scam? In that case your entire effort is wasted. Especially if you are participating in the signature bounty.

[luongdk]

Exactly! i 've just participated in Flogmall bounty, there were a few of participants in signature and for last 2 weeks +150 participants joined and made our reward lower, so long term participants just lose in this case

[doglasslim]

To my best understanding so far this claim might not always be true depending on the number of tokens allocated for bounty campaign of a particular project that will determine how many unit of the token that each successful bounty hunters go home with.

[Ividanik]

Those who stay now will become millionaires in the future because many people will leave and at the end only few people will get part from big bounty pool.

[Dongman2]

You are right here. The more its delayed, the more it allows more people to reg and join the campaign which automatically makes it more people sharing the little tokens on offer. This itself is a big issue.  I think there should be a rewarding scheme for those who have been  on the campaign earlier or longer.

[Maikl]

if ico are constantly delaying and carry terms, respectively proceeds go bad . and in the end can cut the total cost on the bounty company, or you will get too little for a long time work.

[KarinaMix]

I believe that this is not quite true, there are many factors on which the success of the project depends, not always the company will burn out, if you extend it, you can make very good money in such projects.

[Zythiphill]

Well, as I am in bounty I can say that almost always , if there is too much and parties too much well because of this little exhaust!

[Kilomans]

Not really.. I got example for both cases.
Bad example. Rocket ICO - postponed several times since I believe August 2017, very long campaign, campaign now finally ended. Rewards about 20$
Good example: Utrust - very long campaign as well. One of my first bounties ever. Everything was long, campaign, calculations, payment. But, just for social media I received about 500$ in tokens.

So, I thing long campaign - does´t mean bad, and short good! It always depends. Good signature campaign is campaign with limit of participants. I saw many signature campaigns with 2k-5k participants that will share pool, and at the end everyone will get money for ice cream.

Bonus for long time signature campaigns - many of participants will left campaign during this period, and their stakes will just split between everyone.

A perfect example!
Every single case must be counted. And then make a decision.
In several long bounty programs, I made a choice - go out and stop (not the signature company). And this spare time I gave to other new, promising projects.

[EHT7500]

Exactly! i 've just participated in Flogmall bounty, there were a few of participants in signature and for last 2 weeks +150 participants joined and made our reward lower, so long term participants just lose in this case

I agree, I'm sorry ..
Especially if the +150 is higher than you. Recently, bounty managers forbid joining the company signatures in the last 1-2 weeks. It is right!

[Kersh768]

Right from the beginning, there's no consistency when it comes to the profit from anything related to crytos including bounties. Therefore, the campaign period jas nothing to do on how big the profit will be or if it will be small just because the campaign took so long. There are campaigns which lasted only for weeks but the profit are low, and there are also long lasted bounty but resulted to huge profit.

[indobitcoin.tk]

When that too often is delayed then leave it out. Moreover, if by reason of such sales are not a success. This would indicate that, for the future development of the later results of ICO, one will not be too good value. better find another more potent bounty.