AZIZ1977
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 07:55:48 PM |
|
We were mining on wrong blockchains. Thats how we lost the coins.
|
|
|
|
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 07:56:21 PM |
|
MicroGuy why would delete the messages, from yesterday were produced 640 block, 590 block have been confirmed, and at one point they were all gone. Why did this happen?
Sorry. Maybe you were in the middle of an edit but the post made no sense to me. To answer your question, apparently you were on the wrong chain. I will ask the development team to confirm. Thank you for your patience.
|
|
|
|
BryceMiner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 07:58:28 PM |
|
We were mining on wrong blockchains. Thats how we lost the coins.
This coin has seen the last of my hashing power. 2 days of wasted electricity... Nothing but REJECTS!!.... Waste of time!!
|
|
|
|
captainfuture
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 07:59:13 PM |
|
i am really concerned about whats going on with that coin...
|
|
|
|
qwep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 07:59:29 PM |
|
MicroGuy why would delete the messages, from yesterday were produced 640 block, 590 block have been confirmed, and at one point they were all gone. Why did this happen?
Sorry. Maybe you were in the middle of an edit but the post made no sense to me. To answer your question, apparently you were on the wrong chain. I will ask the development team to confirm. Thank you for your patience. that is, the coin return back
|
|
|
|
qwep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:00:24 PM |
|
and by the way is now gone some rejections only
|
|
|
|
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:01:47 PM Last edit: April 05, 2014, 02:45:53 AM by MicroGuy |
|
Honestly looks like something fishy is going on behind the scenes.
Im sure someone must have known everyone would loose 1000's of GLD from updating the client, but yet no mention.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gldtalk.org%2Fdevteam%2Fexperiment.png&t=665&c=3aklt8PwxSClkw) We would have no motivation to do that. Please remember that this is experimental software. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Wekkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531
yes
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:12:07 PM |
|
No opportunity to get in at this low: trade at Cryptsy has been halted for the moment.
|
|
|
|
kimosan
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:22:03 PM Last edit: November 04, 2013, 03:34:39 PM by kimosan |
|
Anybody wishing to sell once everything is worked out and trading resumes I'll take them off your hands.
|
|
|
|
|
blazin8s
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:40:18 PM |
|
Is anyone else having problems transfering? I made a few transfers to another wallet on the latest update and they haven't come through yet. It's been over an hour
|
|
|
|
Epeus
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 95
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 08:59:23 PM |
|
OK. Block found and showed up in my wallet. Available in 118 more blocks. Pffffffffff. EDIT : Transaction ID: 8e1bb8944b56fa7e2ea363a3f295bb146217ad728ac5c93d301fd451fd3ad7b8 Aaaaargh It's gone. Gone in 60 seconds. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 09:49:03 PM |
|
it seems everything is coming back stale. Looks like that new 51% attack defense is screwing up everything.
|
|
|
|
eXclusiveOR
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 09:59:43 PM |
|
After 0.7.1.3 upgrade I deleted my local files (my wallet was empty anyway) and redownloaded the blockchain so everything is clean. I assume I am on the right chain now. I still got the block my CPU miner has found, 328 confirmations, transaction ID: 714f5b1d58f99cdf65b7a319150613b26024accae594e10a1060000eb0c02365
Still cgminer is giving nothing but rejects. From what I read here I am not the only one with that problem. Anyone who got cgminer to mine properly and tells us the settings? Maybe the new protection is somehow triggered on the higher hashrate the GPU miner produces?
|
|
|
|
MicroGuy (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 03, 2013, 10:07:11 PM Last edit: November 03, 2013, 10:25:20 PM by MicroGuy |
|
After 0.7.1.3 upgrade I deleted my local files (my wallet was empty anyway) and redownloaded the blockchain so everything is clean. I assume I am on the right chain now. I still got the block my CPU miner has found, 328 confirmations, transaction ID: 714f5b1d58f99cdf65b7a319150613b26024accae594e10a1060000eb0c02365
Still cgminer is giving nothing but rejects. From what I read here I am not the only one with that problem. Anyone who got cgminer to mine properly and tells us the settings? Maybe the new protection is somehow triggered on the higher hashrate the GPU miner produces?
You can always verify whether you're on the correct blockchain by referring to the block explorer: http://gld.cryptocoinexplorer.com/In regards to mining, the window for mining blocks is small, in that sense its more of a lottery system now than who's got the largest hash-power. We are still monitoring the network for irregularities but have been unable to confirm any definitive problems at this time. Please stayed tuned as the developers will be reporting after they've had the opportunity to analyze and discuss their findings.
|
|
|
|
chondrite
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:23:41 AM |
|
After 0.7.1.3 upgrade I deleted my local files (my wallet was empty anyway) and redownloaded the blockchain so everything is clean. I assume I am on the right chain now. I still got the block my CPU miner has found, 328 confirmations, transaction ID: 714f5b1d58f99cdf65b7a319150613b26024accae594e10a1060000eb0c02365
Still cgminer is giving nothing but rejects. From what I read here I am not the only one with that problem. Anyone who got cgminer to mine properly and tells us the settings? Maybe the new protection is somehow triggered on the higher hashrate the GPU miner produces?
You can always verify whether you're on the correct blockchain by referring to the block explorer: http://gld.cryptocoinexplorer.com/In regards to mining, the window for mining blocks is small, in that sense its more of a lottery system now than who's got the largest hash-power. We are still monitoring the network for irregularities but have been unable to confirm any definitive problems at this time. Please stayed tuned as the developers will be reporting after they've had the opportunity to analyze and discuss their findings. How does your network remain secure without a large group of stable miners? Why would a miner want to mine a coin without knowledge of the profitability of said currency? Maybe you could reveal some more details into how the new 51% attack protection is actually a good implementation for the coin. What is this new factor besides describing it as a lottery?
|
|
|
|
akumaburn
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 281
Merit: 250
The Gold Standard of Digital Currency.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 02:48:05 AM |
|
After 0.7.1.3 upgrade I deleted my local files (my wallet was empty anyway) and redownloaded the blockchain so everything is clean. I assume I am on the right chain now. I still got the block my CPU miner has found, 328 confirmations, transaction ID: 714f5b1d58f99cdf65b7a319150613b26024accae594e10a1060000eb0c02365
Still cgminer is giving nothing but rejects. From what I read here I am not the only one with that problem. Anyone who got cgminer to mine properly and tells us the settings? Maybe the new protection is somehow triggered on the higher hashrate the GPU miner produces?
You can always verify whether you're on the correct blockchain by referring to the block explorer: http://gld.cryptocoinexplorer.com/In regards to mining, the window for mining blocks is small, in that sense its more of a lottery system now than who's got the largest hash-power. We are still monitoring the network for irregularities but have been unable to confirm any definitive problems at this time. Please stayed tuned as the developers will be reporting after they've had the opportunity to analyze and discuss their findings. How does your network remain secure without a large group of stable miners? Why would a miner want to mine a coin without knowledge of the profitability of said currency? Maybe you could reveal some more details into how the new 51% attack protection is actually a good implementation for the coin. What is this new factor besides describing it as a lottery? Please refer to the 51% defense documentation in reference to your first question: http://gldcoin.com/documents/GoldCoin_0.7_51percent_defense_october_11_2013.pdfPlease note that the actual implementation is far more complex than the example (and covers even multipeer attacks). I may write more about it later(time allowing), after all these issues have been resolved. With regards to your second question: Our new difficulty code will address the issue of inaccurate profitability/hashrate calculation so these problems should be addressed in the next update. This new factor is not easily quantifiable hence making it difficult to explain except that the client will not permit more than 6 blocks in less than 10 minutes, regardless of what 6 blocks they are.. We go into a little more depth in the documentation mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
chondrite
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 03:27:09 AM |
|
thanks for the brief explanation and sorry if I missed the document in an earlier post. I will read up and post back any other questions I may have.
|
|
|
|
blazin8s
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 03:52:04 AM |
|
Over 200 confirms and I still haven't gotten a transfer I made over 6 hours ago. I made it from a 0.7.1.2 wallet to a 0.7.1.3 wallet on different computers. I'm afraid to upgrade the other wallet at the risk of losing those coins from what other people are saying. Losing coins is completely unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
chondrite
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 04, 2013, 04:01:51 AM |
|
Ok, so basically this new attack protection says to anyone with a significant hashrate, "Fuck you". What about pools with large hashrates (large in comparison to the GLD network)? There are two main pools for GLD that I can see, what happens if one of those pools bumps over 51%? Will they go into the ban list noted in the pdf and be forbidden to solve new blocks? Likewise, What if an individual with 49% of the coins hashrate quits mining GLD and leaves another person who had 27% of the network now with over 51%? Will they get banned from solving new blocks as well?
|
|
|
|
|