FreeBitco.in-$200 FreeBTC⭐Win Lambo🔥0.2BTC DailyJackpot🏆$32,500 Wager Contest

[Hispo]

That doesn't usually matter. I can put a FUN banner on my website, but that doesn't mean I'm part of the FUN team. Years ago, there was a kind of agreement whereby fbi endorsed the token, but the fbi and FUN teams are different.

FreeBitco.in and FUN are more than just partners. TheQuin admitted they took control over the token’s smart contracts once they bought the supply held in the original team’s treasury. The token’s blog mentions wetsuit taking over as new CEO in 2023. https://medium.com/@FUNtoken/fun-token-the-future-is-bright-with-new-leadership-32e018676448

There are also many on-chain connections. The wallet the FUN team uses to provide liquidity on Uniswap was funded by FreeBitco.in’s cold wallet. When FreeBitco.in swaps BTC, the FUN team's wallet receives stablecoins.

Yes, it's evident that the Fun token and Freebitcoin teams are closely intertwined. For example, earlier on their website, the Freebitcoin logo was mentioned as part of the Fun ecosystem. However, it's noteworthy that they attempted to distance themselves from Freebitcoin as soon as more and more issues began to arise there. By the way, last year, in a Telegram chat, they even wrote that they were not cooperating with Freebitcoin, but then deleted that post.

That is weird though, I thought the team which was in charge of developing FUN token was pretty much the same team which worked for Freebitcoin, considering the latter was the biggest ecosystem which gave support to FUN token.
Anyways, I would need further confirmation about how independent each one of those development teams are from one another, as it stands, it is clear to me we would be talking about the same people, considering FUN token has not been able to sell itself to other casinos to offer perks and advantages to holders of FUN. I am yet to see FUN being supported by Stake, for example, and even if it is supported, Stake would not offer advantages to those who stake their FUN on their accounts.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

That was my general take, whether it was intended or not you cannot ever place 100% in something expecting success because there is just too many unknowns.    There is no yield on BTC but the returns given here were for that innate risk taken, same as the holdings on every website.
   I also think its true that just from fluctuations in price of BTC its possible a fair exit can play out.   The idea of conversion seems unlikely as that deviates from just having the simplicity of BTC which has always been an advantage the site used.
  The domain name will always have a worth, I dont know how that wouldnt be true and generally I think its worth more to continue then desist but I dont know all details of course.

Yeah, many of us trust too much but if we are to be sincere with or to ourselves, we can't blame anyone who trusted this platform too much because based on what services they rendered to the bitcoin and crypto currency community, and how long and far they have come, many people are testifiers to benefitting from this platform, a platform that have helped many people in crypto earn their first bitcoin though in Sats and have stood the test of time when other faucets all folded up will be trusted to the core.

And let's also agree with the reality that if the site wasn't sold, things would have still be good and normal now, though I am not sure but many here said the site was sold, which I assume the real owners unfortunately sold the site to the wrong person or set of people.

[UmerIdrees]

I'm sorry that your relatives lost their money after investing in Fun Token, but that's that's what usually happens with all these new crypto coins, apart from a few, innit? I think the owners of FreeBitco.in could be honestly believing in the bright future of Fun Token, same as many others associated with their projects, and that the fall of the token wasn't some kind of intentional fraud, but just bad luck. That's why I still believe they can process all the withdrawals made by their honest customers, I don't think Fun Token was some evil scheme created by them intentionally.

The fun token could have been a success if the platform Freebitco existed, and they offered more incentives for the gamblers to use the FUN token in order to gamble, and the gamblers would have preferred to use the Fun token over other cryptocurrencies.

In short, I mean they needed to introduce more use cases for this token, like buyback or returning some to those losing bets, etc., although they were already providing staking services. There are a lot of ways where the utility of this token could have been increased, but unfortunately, the owners started scamming, denying Fun token withdrawals and a lot of other problems on the platform.

[Hispo]

I'm sorry that your relatives lost their money after investing in Fun Token, but that's that's what usually happens with all these new crypto coins, apart from a few, innit? I think the owners of FreeBitco.in could be honestly believing in the bright future of Fun Token, same as many others associated with their projects, and that the fall of the token wasn't some kind of intentional fraud, but just bad luck. That's why I still believe they can process all the withdrawals made by their honest customers, I don't think Fun Token was some evil scheme created by them intentionally.

The fun token could have been a success if the platform Freebitco existed, and they offered more incentives for the gamblers to use the FUN token in order to gamble, and the gamblers would have preferred to use the Fun token over other cryptocurrencies.

In short, I mean they needed to introduce more use cases for this token, like buyback or returning some to those losing bets, etc., although they were already providing staking services. There are a lot of ways where the utility of this token could have been increased, but unfortunately, the owners started scamming, denying Fun token withdrawals and a lot of other problems on the platform.

As crazy as it sounds, there could be a second chance for FUN token to shine if there is some casino out there willing to give this token a chance as their utility asset, but that is unlikely to ever happen, considering the team behind FUN has something to do with Freebitcoin, and they all have earned and very bad reputation.

Just imagine Rollbit adopted FUN or Betpanda adopted FUN as well, the price will pump hard as use case increased. Still believe FUN damaged or had something to do with the downfall of Freebitcoin and their lack of liquidity.

[ultrloa]

I'm sorry that your relatives lost their money after investing in Fun Token, but that's that's what usually happens with all these new crypto coins, apart from a few, innit? I think the owners of FreeBitco.in could be honestly believing in the bright future of Fun Token, same as many others associated with their projects, and that the fall of the token wasn't some kind of intentional fraud, but just bad luck. That's why I still believe they can process all the withdrawals made by their honest customers, I don't think Fun Token was some evil scheme created by them intentionally.

The fun token could have been a success if the platform Freebitco existed, and they offered more incentives for the gamblers to use the FUN token in order to gamble, and the gamblers would have preferred to use the Fun token over other cryptocurrencies.

In short, I mean they needed to introduce more use cases for this token, like buyback or returning some to those losing bets, etc., although they were already providing staking services. There are a lot of ways where the utility of this token could have been increased, but unfortunately, the owners started scamming, denying Fun token withdrawals and a lot of other problems on the platform.

As crazy as it sounds, there could be a second chance for FUN token to shine if there is some casino out there willing to give this token a chance as their utility asset, but that is unlikely to ever happen, considering the team behind FUN has something to do with Freebitcoin, and they all have earned and very bad reputation.

Just imagine Rollbit adopted FUN or Betpanda adopted FUN as well, the price will pump hard as use case increased. Still believe FUN damaged or had something to do with the downfall of Freebitcoin and their lack of liquidity.

With what happen to this casino? I think its hard for other casino to think about adopting this token.

Since they provably don't want to get tied by bad reputation gotten by that token and also to the ones handle it.

Rollbit provably won't do that since they have token that they need to focus on. Also I don't think Betpanda will adopt this to since for sure they don't want to get problem and be dragged on their controversies, they are already successful and no need for them to think about adopting FUN token.

[mirakal]

Also I don't think Betpanda will adopt this to since for sure they don't want to get problem and be dragged on their controversies, they are already successful and no need for them to think about adopting FUN token.

What would they even gain by adopting it? Their current setup already makes them one of the biggest casinos in the space, so experimenting with something like this, especially with FUN Token which has been struggling for years, doesn’t really make sense. If they were to adopt anything, it should be something fresh with real potential in the market. But honestly, gambling tokens in general don’t have a great track record, the success rate is pretty low.

[iv4n]

Also I don't think Betpanda will adopt this to since for sure they don't want to get problem and be dragged on their controversies, they are already successful and no need for them to think about adopting FUN token.

What would they even gain by adopting it? Their current setup already makes them one of the biggest casinos in the space, so experimenting with something like this, especially with FUN Token which has been struggling for years, doesn’t really make sense. If they were to adopt anything, it should be something fresh with real potential in the market. But honestly, gambling tokens in general don’t have a great track record, the success rate is pretty low.

They wouldn't gain anything. As Ultrloa said, they will just be dragged into some controversies... It's silly to even think about it. If they wish, they can create their own token... as some other casinos did at some point.

As crazy as it sounds, there could be a second chance for FUN token to shine if there is some casino out there willing to give this token a chance as their utility asset, but that is unlikely to ever happen, considering the team behind FUN has something to do with Freebitcoin, and they all have earned and very bad reputation.

Even you added "that is unlikely to ever happen"... FUN token is done. So I don't think there will be a second or a third chance for FUN to shine.

[Hispo]

With what happen to this casino? I think its hard for other casino to think about adopting this token.

Since they provably don't want to get tied by bad reputation gotten by that token and also to the ones handle it.

Rollbit provably won't do that since they have token that they need to focus on. Also I don't think Betpanda will adopt this to since for sure they don't want to get problem and be dragged on their controversies, they are already successful and no need for them to think about adopting FUN token.

Assuming it ever happens, it will be a casino which does not have their own token already, that is obvious, it would dilute the attention and capital of their own token in favor of FUN. It would not be an intelligent move by any business within the world of gambling.

Still, as some people have pointed out in this thread, the reputation of this token and Freebitcoin isnso tarnished that it is likely this token will get forgotten about and nobody will ever pick it off the ground to rescue it.

An utility token is pretty much dead if it does not have any use case on any platform.

[PendingForever]

That doesn't usually matter. I can put a FUN banner on my website, but that doesn't mean I'm part of the FUN team. Years ago, there was a kind of agreement whereby fbi endorsed the token, but the fbi and FUN teams are different.

FreeBitco.in and FUN are more than just partners. TheQuin admitted they took control over the token’s smart contracts once they bought the supply held in the original team’s treasury. The token’s blog mentions wetsuit taking over as new CEO in 2023. https://medium.com/@FUNtoken/fun-token-the-future-is-bright-with-new-leadership-32e018676448

There are also many on-chain connections. The wallet the FUN team uses to provide liquidity on Uniswap was funded by FreeBitco.in’s cold wallet. When FreeBitco.in swaps BTC, the FUN team's wallet receives stablecoins.

Yes, it's evident that the Fun token and Freebitcoin teams are closely intertwined. For example, earlier on their website, the Freebitcoin logo was mentioned as part of the Fun ecosystem. However, it's noteworthy that they attempted to distance themselves from Freebitcoin as soon as more and more issues began to arise there. By the way, last year, in a Telegram chat, they even wrote that they were not cooperating with Freebitcoin, but then deleted that post.

https://www.talkimg.com/images/2026/01/10/UFzKVZ.jpeg

That is weird though, I thought the team which was in charge of developing FUN token was pretty much the same team which worked for Freebitcoin, considering the latter was the biggest ecosystem which gave support to FUN token.
Anyways, I would need further confirmation about how independent each one of those development teams are from one another, as it stands, it is clear to me we would be talking about the same people, considering FUN token has not been able to sell itself to other casinos to offer perks and advantages to holders of FUN. I am yet to see FUN being supported by Stake, for example, and even if it is supported, Stake would not offer advantages to those who stake their FUN on their accounts.

I think the old legit team of Fun token is long gone and it was acquired by indians who turned it into a generic scam coin. There is no more attempts of serious development as evident from their completely missed 2025 road map and lack of 2026 roadmap https://www.funtoken.io/road-map

[Free Market Capitalist]

I think the old legit team of Fun token is long gone and it was acquired by indians who turned it into a generic scam coin. There is no more attempts of serious development as evident from their completely missed 2025 road map and lack of 2026 roadmap https://www.funtoken.io/road-map

Lol, one theory is that freebitco.in was acquired by Indians, and if we add the interconnections between FUN and the site, they could have been acquired by the same team. Although all this is nothing more than hearsay.

[id5000]

I think the old legit team of Fun token is long gone and it was acquired by indians who turned it into a generic scam coin. There is no more attempts of serious development as evident from their completely missed 2025 road map and lack of 2026 roadmap https://www.funtoken.io/road-map

Lol, one theory is that freebitco.in was acquired by Indians, and if we add the interconnections between FUN and the site, they could have been acquired by the same team. Although all this is nothing more than hearsay.

- Indians? What does that implicit?

[GinnyBanzz]

I think the old legit team of Fun token is long gone and it was acquired by indians who turned it into a generic scam coin. There is no more attempts of serious development as evident from their completely missed 2025 road map and lack of 2026 roadmap https://www.funtoken.io/road-map

Lol, one theory is that freebitco.in was acquired by Indians, and if we add the interconnections between FUN and the site, they could have been acquired by the same team. Although all this is nothing more than hearsay.

- Indians? What does that implicit?

Have a guess....

[Agbe]

Yeah, many of us trust too much but if we are to be sincere with or to ourselves, we can't blame anyone who trusted this platform too much because based on what services they rendered to the bitcoin and crypto currency community, and how long and far they have come, many people are testifiers to benefitting from this platform, a platform that have helped many people in crypto earn their first bitcoin though in Sats and have stood the test of time when other faucets all folded up will be trusted to the core.

And let's also agree with the reality that if the site wasn't sold, things would have still be good and normal now, though I am not sure but many here said the site was sold, which I assume the real owners unfortunately sold the site to the wrong person or set of people.

Mostly from the signature Campaign. Freebitco was one of the best advertising company in the forum and people trusted them from that angle. And nobody thought it would happened in this way. And they didn't just exited suddenly or at once but it was a gradual process. Why happened in the case of freebitco was just like Ponzi scheme. They first made many people to benefit from it. And started the exit gradually.

[LTU_btc]

Mostly from the signature Campaign. Freebitco was one of the best advertising company in the forum and people trusted them from that angle. And nobody thought it would happened in this way. And they didn't just exited suddenly or at once but it was a gradual process. Why happened in the case of freebitco was just like Ponzi scheme. They first made many people to benefit from it. And started the exit gradually.

Nope, signature campaign wasn't main factor which helped Freebitco.in to build trust. They were already huge and trusted before launch campaign. It's more how they were running website in general, all their actions step by step helped them to become probably most popular Bitcoin related website.
And same like all their actions stpe by step killed everything what they were building in all these years.

[16xypjnxlrew]

Mostly from the signature Campaign. Freebitco was one of the best advertising company in the forum and people trusted them from that angle. And nobody thought it would happened in this way. And they didn't just exited suddenly or at once but it was a gradual process. Why happened in the case of freebitco was just like Ponzi scheme. They first made many people to benefit from it. And started the exit gradually.

Could you remind me which signature campaign you’re talking about? Is there a topic about this? How many participants (10/100/1,000/10,000) were involved? How much did they pay per week?