Bitcoin Forum
August 17, 2018, 12:45:41 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.2  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 71 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BitShares PTS (formerly ProtoShares) Mandatory Upgrade & Snapshot Announcement  (Read 218013 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Stinky_Pete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:41:30 PM
 #101

Started mining about 9:30 am

So far 2 blocks on 6 core Gulftown (within minutes of each other), 1 block on dual Xeons, 0 blocks on quad opterons.

Luck

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
bahamapascal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 693
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:44:47 PM
 #102

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue
Fablio2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 458
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:46:00 PM
 #103

How can something be IT Administrator Resistant?! I'm mining just fine  Grin

Found my first block, 7 hpm
I wrote that there is little protection (large memory requirements and the restriction on the number of processes. In any case, this coin harder to mine than XPM, where you can throw a little invisible process that don't use much memory, and no one will know it.
Sy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:52:28 PM
 #104

How can something be IT Administrator Resistant?! I'm mining just fine  Grin

Found my first block, 7 hpm
I wrote that there is little protection (large memory requirements and the restriction on the number of processes. In any case, this coin harder to mine than XPM, where you can throw a little invisible process that don't use much memory, and no one will know it.


User are trained to look for cpu usage and not memory so it won't matter if you start one xpm thread with low memory usage or one proto thread with 700 mb memory, even finding a blocking process is beyond many users capabilities. Even quads are uncommon in offices so the sneaky sysadmin woulnd't start more than one thread anyway, thus the 3 threads limit is ineffective.

If you are a datacenter admin on the other hand, both doesn't bother you since you're either running linux or just spam instances.

But we are going offtopic  Grin


              ▀███▄
                ▀███▄
                 ▄███▀
       ▀███▄   ▄███▀ ▀███▄
         ▀███▄▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄
          ▄███▀         ▄███▀
▀███▄   ▄███▀ ▀███▄   ▄███▀ ▀███▄
  ▀███▄▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄
   ▄███▀         ▄███▀         ▄███▀
 ▄███▀ ▀███▄   ▄███▀ ▀███▄   ▄███▀
▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄▀▀▀▀
          ▄███▀         ▄███▀
        ▄███▀ ▀███▄   ▄███▀
       ▀▀▀▀     ▀███▄▀▀▀▀
                 ▄███▀

               ▄███▀
              ▀▀▀▀

.ELONCITY.
       ▄█████▄               ▐███▄▄
   ▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄            ████████▄▄
   ▓ ▓██▓▓█▀▀▀█▓▓            ████████████▄▄
   ▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█████▓▓           ▐█████████████████▄
  ▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█▄▄▄█▓▓█▄         ▐███████████████████
 ██▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█▄▄▄█▓▓███▄       █      ▀▀▀▀▀▀████████▄
▐██▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█▄▄▄█▓▓█████▄  ▄▄▄█                ▀▀▀▀▀
▐██▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█▄▄▄█▓▓ ▀▀████████
▐██▓ ▓▓▓▓▓█▄▄▄█▓▓      ▀▀▀▀▐▌
 ███▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀         
 ▐██▀██████████▀           
  ▀▀▐███████████          ▐▌
    ▐█████▐█████          ▐▌
     ████▌ ████▌         
     ▐███▌ ████          ▐▌
      ███  ▐██▌          ▐▌
    ▄▄███  ▐██▄▄         
   ██████▌ ██████       
....TELEGRAM..

Public Sale Coming Soon!

alexxy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:53:51 PM
 #105

memory dedup does its things right. so utilization isnt too heavy =D
dr_chen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:56:36 PM
 #106

memory dedup does its things right. so utilization isnt too heavy =D

I5 2300 with memory 2g can not mine

At least, 4g is necessory

   ██                                                     
██████                                                     
██████████                ████              ████           
█████████████          ██████████        ██████████       
█████  █████████    ███████████████   ████████████████     
█████     ████████████████   ████  ██████████  ██████████ 
█████        ██████████          █████████        █████████
█████         ██████             ██████              ████ 
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         █████              ████                     
█████         ███████            ██████              ████ 
█████        ███████████         █████████        █████████
█████     █████████████████  ████   █████████  ██████████ 
█████  █████████    ███████████████   ████████████████     
█████████████          █████████         ██████████       
██████████                ████              ████           
  ████                                                     
/Distributed
Credit Chain
//
Empower Credit, Enable Finance
GithubFacebookMedium ‹‹‹dcc.finance››› RedditTwitterTelegram
Buratino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1155
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:57:15 PM
 #107

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue

In my case, it could be 3 blocks, but one is orphaned block. I don't use the same wallet on different instances - it gives more chances to generate block.

klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:58:04 PM
 #108

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue
How do you see this?
alexxy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 02:58:53 PM
 #109

So far so good: 7 blocks and 2 orphans
Fablio2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 458
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:01:32 PM
 #110

How can something be IT Administrator Resistant?! I'm mining just fine  Grin

Found my first block, 7 hpm
I wrote that there is little protection (large memory requirements and the restriction on the number of processes. In any case, this coin harder to mine than XPM, where you can throw a little invisible process that don't use much memory, and no one will know it.


User are trained to look for cpu usage and not memory so it won't matter if you start one xpm thread with low memory usage or one proto thread with 700 mb memory, even finding a blocking process is beyond many users capabilities. Even quads are uncommon in offices so the sneaky sysadmin woulnd't start more than one thread anyway, thus the 3 threads limit is ineffective.

If you are a datacenter admin on the other hand, both doesn't bother you since you're either running linux or just spam instances.

But we are going offtopic  Grin
Are you sure you can easily and invisible use the 32-core server and tons of office computers with 1-2GB of RAM when you need to install a QT for each of them?
Buratino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1155
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:03:36 PM
 #111

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue
How do you see this?

Type
Code:
listtransactions
in console window

klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:04:10 PM
 #112

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue
How do you see this?

Type
Code:
listtransactions
in console window
Million thanks mate - apologies for being so newbie in this...
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:05:31 PM
 #113

So what do I got here?

[
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "PmPYqCVy6X8R4cGRr2fazBVMZeC4716qcG",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 276,

"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "000614fe0b5a14ad50dab947745abd1c0bb2625c7149a999bfafa7a8bb999608",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1383652356,
"txid" : "ab9ef4f8f7c730b86019ef28cf8da2d145414f133074009c773fa7f5cf52eb88",
"time" : 1383652356,
"timereceived" : 1383652380
}
]
ATC
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:06:22 PM
 #114

I run it with Mac successfully. So how to mine? There is no debug window for mac version.

Thanks.


Check that CPU and memory is under heavily utilization.

Is "setgenerate true 2"  not necessary? So is the Mac version mine by default?
alexxy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:08:49 PM
 #115

Are you sure you can easily and invisible use the 32-core server and tons of office computers with 1-2GB of RAM when you need to install a QT for each of them?

You dont actualy need full qt install =D
Buratino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1155
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:11:18 PM
 #116

So what do I got here?

[
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "PmPYqCVy6X8R4cGRr2fazBVMZeC4716qcG",
"category" : "generate",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 276,

"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "000614fe0b5a14ad50dab947745abd1c0bb2625c7149a999bfafa7a8bb999608",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1383652356,
"txid" : "ab9ef4f8f7c730b86019ef28cf8da2d145414f133074009c773fa7f5cf52eb88",
"time" : 1383652356,
"timereceived" : 1383652380
}
]


I see that this is a normal generated block.
Here is my list of transactions:
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "PqMJ4EejT8QNSLXjFNMA7arSWWFsbVU1wX",
"category" : "orphan",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 0,
"generated" : true,
"txid" : "79466661536f01902308dd29b89366523dbb1fc6221f335468c8f0a3378bfd89",
"time" : 1383648052,
"timereceived" : 1383648070
},
{
"account" : "",
"address" : "Pa2iUervGAchNAmzQSup6PQG2jm1SMQTip",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 95,
"generated" : true,
"blockhash" : "00010778425538d90872d757a1fd85408cb4bffb47a735c338ab554fd10f0cf0",
"blockindex" : 0,
"blocktime" : 1383658879,
"txid" : "07dc812c01cc0357c78c70ef23d5dca05a0b8caaf42ed770c8908a8d70f663b4",
"time" : 1383658879,
"timereceived" : 1383658896
}

Buratino
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1155
Merit: 1003


View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
 #117


Is "setgenerate true 2"  not necessary? So is the Mac version mine by default?


Unfortunately, I don't have user experience with Mac. I think wallet doesn't run mining by default, so you should start it manually.
Typing setgenerate true 2 in console window or clicking Settings->Mine 2 Processes may be is necessary.
I don't know how wallet is presented in Mac version.

bahamapascal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 693
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:21:55 PM
 #118

LOL, two instances mined a block I just see, both were rejektet Sad
What kind of bad luck is that, two in a row rejektet Tongue

In my case, it could be 3 blocks, but one is orphaned block. I don't use the same wallet on different instances - it gives more chances to generate block.

Well, I dont use the same wallets on may instances any ways, all different wallets and block chain in a different folder...
but thanks for the advice Wink
cryptasm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 979
Merit: 1000


Bitcoin Fintech cryptos


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2013, 03:41:23 PM
 #119

 No blocks yet  Cry 
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 05, 2013, 03:44:46 PM
 #120

1 block here!
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 71 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!