[JCE]Fast & stable CN/v8/Heavy/Tube/XHV miner, CPU+GPU, Vega56 1800+ RX580 1200+

[syncro2017]

First of all, Thanks for the great work @JCE-Miner , i believe in a while this will be the fastest miner
Now here are the results of my test on one of my rigs.
Setup : 6 Cards

Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Hynix - Index 0
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 3
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 4
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 1
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 2
Asus RX550 LP 2GB Hynix - Index 5

All flashed with custom bios

Mining Monero (XMR)

start.bat command line for miner:  

Code:

jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c confgpu.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*

confgpu.txt:

Code:

"gpu_threads_conf" : 
[ 
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
]

After playing with config values for about an hour , looks like these are the best i came up with. the issue is the a very long time it takes to restart the miner because of opencl payload compilation

Result after 12 hours running:

Code:

08:19:36 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 476.87 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 472.91 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 258.28 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 259.26 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 249.72 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 249.91 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 502.95 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 502.85 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 487.18 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 486.15 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 262.35 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 262.57 h/s
08:19:37 | Total: 4470.93 h/s - Max: 4479.91 h/s

XMR Stak 2.4.5 config:

Code:

  // gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
  // compute units: 32
  // Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Elpida
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 0,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  
  // gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
  // compute units: 8
  // MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
  { "index" : 1,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 1,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  
  // gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
  // compute units: 8
  // MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
  { "index" : 2,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 2,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

  // gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
  // compute units: 36
  // Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix
  { "index" : 3,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 3,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },  
  
  // gpu: Ellesmere memory:3673
  // compute units: 36
  // Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix
  { "index" : 4,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 4,
    "intensity" : 880, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 8,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },  
  
  // gpu: gfx804 memory:1646
  // compute units: 8
  // MSI RX550 2GB Elpida
  { "index" : 5,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },
  { "index" : 5,
    "intensity" : 440, "worksize" : 8,
    "affine_to_cpu" : false, "strided_index" : 2, "mem_chunk" : 2,
    "comp_mode" : true
  },

XMR Stak 2.4.5 result:

Code:

HASHRATE REPORT - AMD

| ID |    10s  |    60s  |   15m | ID |    10s  |    60s |    15m |
|  0  |  471.2 |  471.9 |   (na) |  1 |  471.2 |  470.5 |   (na) |
|  2  |  248.9 |  248.0 |   (na) |  3 |  251.1 |  247.7 |   (na) |
|  4  |  243.4 |  241.6 |   (na) |  5 |  238.8 |  239.5 |   (na) |
|  6  |  493.0 |  493.8 |   (na) |  7 |  493.3 |  492.5 |   (na) |
|  8  |  477.3 |  477.7 |   (na) |  9 |  477.1 |  476.6 |   (na) |
| 10 |  255.4 |  255.7 |   (na) | 11 |  251.9 |  254.3 |   (na) |
Totals (AMD):  4372.5 4369.8    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):   4372.5 4369.8    0.0 H/s
Highest:  4376.5 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 

SRB Miner 1.6.1 Config:

Code:

"gpu_conf" : 
[ 
	{ "id" : 0, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
	{ "id" : 1, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
	{ "id" : 2, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
	{ "id" : 3, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
	{ "id" : 4, "intensity" : 58, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2},
	{ "id" : 5, "intensity" : 20, "worksize" : 16, "threads" : 2},
	
]
}

SRB Miner 1.6.1 Result:

Code:

GPU0: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 1]
GPU1: Radeon RX 570 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 3]
GPU2: Radeon RX 580 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 4]
GPU3: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 5]
GPU4: Radeon RX 580 Series [Ellesmere] [4096 MB][Intensity 58.0][W: 8][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 8]
GPU5: Radeon 550 Series [gfx804] [2048 MB][Intensity 20.0][W: 16][T: 2][K: 1][BUS: 9]

[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU0 :    470 H/s [T: 61c, RPM: 3674, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:1]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU1 :    967 H/s [T: 58c, RPM: 1081, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 1950 MHz][BUS:3]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU2 :    1022 H/s [T: 64c, RPM: 765, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2150 MHz][BUS:4]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU3 :    484 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 3221, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:5]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU4 :    988 H/s [T: 57c, RPM: 901, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2100 MHz][BUS:8]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] GPU5 :    494 H/s [T: 55c, RPM: 0, CC: 1250 MHz, MC: 2000 MHz][BUS:9]
[2018-06-27 10:32:27] Total:    4425 H/s

Rig was running very stable for over 12 hours. Very impressive RX550 performance, over 500h/s, great job on this one!
Now couple of remarks:

1. Takes a long time to generate the opencl payload for the cards, i know that this is just the first beta but would be a really good idea to implement cache so need to generate only once and then just use the pre-compiled binary and load into the cards, like xmr-stak does.
2. When reporting the share value, its always the same and is equal to a static diff i set to mine at, here is the log:

Code:

08:19:45 | GPU Thread 1 Lane 14 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:45 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:47 | GPU Thread 6 Lane 138 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:47 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:55 | GPU Thread 2 Lane 69 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 380 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 390 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 10 Lane 254 finds a Share, value 27060

as you can see value is always 27060

Otherwise, great job!!! hope there will be more optimizations and another release soon for even more hashrate

[gvb]

ok, my issues seems to be solved.

I installed a mining specific amd driver, rebooted and now it's mining on the GPU aswell.

It went from 130H/s CPU to 285H/S CPU+GPU

Thanks a lot, enjoy your fee!

[UnclWish]

First of all, Thanks for the great work @JCE-Miner , i believe in a while this will be the fastest miner
Now here are the results of my test on one of my rigs.
Setup : 6 Cards

Asus ROG Strix RX570 4GB Hynix - Index 0
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 3
Sapphire Pulse RX580 4GB Hynix - Index 4
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 1
MSI RX550 LP 2GB Elpida - Index 2
Asus RX550 LP 2GB Hynix - Index 5

All flashed with custom bios

Mining Monero (XMR)

start.bat command line for miner: 

Code:

jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c confgpu.txt --no-cpu --any --forever --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %*

confgpu.txt:

Code:

"gpu_threads_conf" : 
[ 
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":912 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 5, "multi_hash":432 },
]

After playing with config values for about an hour , looks like these are the best i came up with. the issue is the a very long time it takes to restart the miner because of opencl payload compilation

Result after 12 hours running:

Code:

08:19:36 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 476.87 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 472.91 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 258.28 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 259.26 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 249.72 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 249.91 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 502.95 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 502.85 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 487.18 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 486.15 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 262.35 h/s
08:19:37 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 262.57 h/s
08:19:37 | Total: 4470.93 h/s - Max: 4479.91 h/s

XMR Stak result:

Code:

HASHRATE REPORT - AMD

| ID |    10s  |    60s  |   15m | ID |    10s  |    60s |    15m |
|  0  |  471.2 |  471.9 |   (na) |  1 |  471.2 |  470.5 |   (na) |
|  2  |  248.9 |  248.0 |   (na) |  3 |  251.1 |  247.7 |   (na) |
|  4  |  243.4 |  241.6 |   (na) |  5 |  238.8 |  239.5 |   (na) |
|  6  |  493.0 |  493.8 |   (na) |  7 |  493.3 |  492.5 |   (na) |
|  8  |  477.3 |  477.7 |   (na) |  9 |  477.1 |  476.6 |   (na) |
| 10 |  255.4 |  255.7 |   (na) | 11 |  251.9 |  254.3 |   (na) |
Totals (AMD):  4372.5 4369.8    0.0 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Totals (ALL):   4372.5 4369.8    0.0 H/s
Highest:  4376.5 H/s
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 

Rig was running very stable for over 12 hours. Very impressive RX550 performance, over 500h/s, great job on this one!
Now couple of remarks:

1. Takes a long time to generate the opencl payload for the cards, i know that this is just the first beta but would be a really good idea to implement cache so need to generate only once and then just use the pre-compiled binary and load into the cards, like xmr-stak does.
2. When reporting the share value, its always the same and is equal to a static diff i set to mine at, here is the log:

Code:

08:19:45 | GPU Thread 1 Lane 14 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:45 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:47 | GPU Thread 6 Lane 138 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:47 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:55 | GPU Thread 2 Lane 69 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 380 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 11 Lane 390 finds a Share, value 27060
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | Accepted by the pool.
08:19:56 | GPU Thread 10 Lane 254 finds a Share, value 27060

as you can see value is always 27060

Otherwise, great job!!! hope there will be more optimizations and another release soon for even more hashrate

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

[syncro2017]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

[syncro2017]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I take the previous comment back for a moment, just downloaded the latest SRB Miner 1.6.1, seems the hashrate is on part with JCE
I updated my post, just to be clear, overclock/undervolt settings were the same between all test

[UnclWish]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

[hammuh]

Vega 64s

confgpu.txt
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
(etc.)

12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 1019.38 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 1042.35 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 1022.37 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 1035.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 1026.74 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 1029.77 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 1030.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 1024.28 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 1020.92 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 1031.15 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 1007.70 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 1027.57 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 1019.47 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 1027.29 h/s
12:08:34 | Total: 14365.70 h/s - Max: 14388.12 h/s

[UnclWish]

Vega 64s

confgpu.txt
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
(etc.)

12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 1019.38 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 1042.35 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 1022.37 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 1035.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 1026.74 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 1029.77 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 1030.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 1024.28 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 1020.92 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 1031.15 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 1007.70 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 1027.57 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 1019.47 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 1027.29 h/s
12:08:34 | Total: 14365.70 h/s - Max: 14388.12 h/s

It's need results from other miners like SRB and Cast XMR to compare with. And point algo and amount of video memory please.

[syncro2017]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB?
I would love to try it out

[UnclWish]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB?
I would love to try it out

Ok. I didn't have 4Gb 570/580 card. There is .srb kernel bin file for rx 580 8Gb: https://yadi.sk/d/1QFcuG-g3YVNWg
This file needs to be copied to "cache" subfolder of SRB miner folder.
Than you need 1.6.0 version of miner. On 1.6.1 speed on v7 is lower.
In config:

        { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 116.0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false},

It's for 580 8Gb card without connected monitor (more available video memory). Maked and tested on Windows 10 x64 1803 with AMD 18.6.1 driver.
This settings require about 7.2Gb of free video memory.

P.S. Kernel bin from link woudn't work on 1.6.1 version. doctor changed cn kernels on 1.6.1 version...

[cryptoinvestor_x]

I get an error when running with GPU'

Compilation of Open CL Kernels failed CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE

It works on another system with no issues though. Any ideas?

[syncro2017]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB?
I would love to try it out

Ok. I didn't have 4Gb 570/580 card. There is .srb kernel bin file for rx 580 8Gb: https://yadi.sk/d/1QFcuG-g3YVNWg
This file needs to be copied to "cache" subfolder of SRB miner folder.
Than you need 1.6.0 version of miner. On 1.6.1 speed on v7 is lower.
In config:

        { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 116.0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false},

It's for 580 8Gb card without connected monitor (more available video memory). Maked and tested on Windows 10 x64 1803 with AMD 18.6.1 driver.
This settings require about 7.2Gb of free video memory.

P.S. Kernel bin from link woudn't work on 1.6.1 version. doctor changed cn kernels on 1.6.1 version...

Thanks for the link, just tried and in fact its a better kernel for RX580 8GB.
Where did you get it, is it possible to get one for 4GB RX570/580, i only have 2 8GB cards

[JCE-Miner]

Wow, so many comments, thanks all

Multiple of 16 : that's a technical constraint due to how is my code. I cannot work with smaller multiples.

Cached pre-compile : not that simple, on JCE since the OpenCL code is generated, pre-optimized and injected on the fly, it's not just a per-GPU like for Stak. Not impossible to cache, but not trivial. I know that on a 8-gpu system it takes a long time.

Vega : i'm at 2k+ on Vega 64 ? Nice, i didn't even try to beat Cast, which is ultra-optimized for them. Is it on par with Cast? Of course i've no vega to test on

CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE : hard to tell with just that message, but in next version i'll add more details about diagnostics.

The RX550 and 560 are the card I optimized the most for, among with the HD7800s, just because... i own a lot of them. I've no RX570/580 or better.

>>2. When reporting the share value, its always the same and is equal to a static diff i set to mine at, here is the log
That's normal, don't get confused with Claymore logs. JCE logs the share value, in the sense value in hashes, not the hashcode itself (which is perfectly useless to know). So a static diff of N will display N every time, that's the expected behavior. And that was the behavior of old Clamore 9.x, i don't know why Claymore turned it into the useless hashcode...

Separate algo : i plan to separate the algo of CPU, and of every GPU (since some are better on Heavy, some on v7...). The algo in command line will be the CPU algo, and the default for GPU. And the GPU algo will then be overridable per-GPU in the config file.

270X speed: Strange your card goes so high with Claymore and so low with JCE. I retested my HD7870, with Claymore configured not to find only bad shares (which is what it does if i raise the -h too high) and i can get 516 with ~10% bad shares. JCE goes to 540 with zero bad shares. No screen plugged on the card. And on my HD7850 2G i get 512h/s, while claymore does not go over 460. But on my HD7850 1G, claymore is still at 455 while JCE drops to a pitty 355.

[hammuh]

Monero (Cryptonight V7)
AMD Driver 18.6.1
7 x Vega 64

In castxmr and xmr-stak (intensity 1932 double threads) I get around 13800-13900 h/s.
In JCE (intensity 1920) got 14300-14400 h/s. So a little bit better than those.
Dunno about SRB. Probably gonna be same results as cast and stak.
All this hashrate is what the mining software has reported.

Also, I briefly tried haven algo but saw no significant improvement over competitors.

Vega 64s

confgpu.txt
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1920 },
(etc.)

12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 1019.38 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 1042.35 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 1022.37 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 1035.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 1026.74 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 1029.77 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 1030.88 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 1024.28 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 1020.92 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 1031.15 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 10: 1007.70 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 11: 1027.57 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 12: 1019.47 h/s
12:08:34 | Hashrate GPU Thread 13: 1027.29 h/s
12:08:34 | Total: 14365.70 h/s - Max: 14388.12 h/s

It's need results from other miners like SRB and Cast XMR to compare with. And point algo and amount of video memory please.

[KriptoGuruTR]

I get an error when running with GPU'

Compilation of Open CL Kernels failed CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE

It works on another system with no issues though. Any ideas?

Maybe this?

Code:

sudo apt install opencl-headers

Cant wait to test gpu version with my Ubuntu 18.04 LTS Server AMD rig.

[JCE-Miner]

JCE GPU is on Win64 only.
I don't know if i'll release a Linux version. On CPU version, linux users are like 5% of total, not good to be motivated. And Linux miners are a lot more rare than Windows ones.

For the same reason, there will be no Win32 version.

In castxmr and xmr-stak (intensity 1932 double threads) I get around 13800-13900 h/s.
In JCE (intensity 1920) got 14300-14400 h/s. So a little bit better than those.
Dunno about SRB. Probably gonna be same results as cast and stak.
All this hashrate is what the mining software has reported.

So I beat Cast woow, i didn't even do it on purpose
JCE reports exact instant hashrate with no tweak, at 0.01 precision. And bad shares are reported, never hidden.

[UnclWish]

XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.

I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee

You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel.
On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee.

Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB?
I would love to try it out

Ok. I didn't have 4Gb 570/580 card. There is .srb kernel bin file for rx 580 8Gb: https://yadi.sk/d/1QFcuG-g3YVNWg
This file needs to be copied to "cache" subfolder of SRB miner folder.
Than you need 1.6.0 version of miner. On 1.6.1 speed on v7 is lower.
In config:

        { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 116.0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false},

It's for 580 8Gb card without connected monitor (more available video memory). Maked and tested on Windows 10 x64 1803 with AMD 18.6.1 driver.
This settings require about 7.2Gb of free video memory.

P.S. Kernel bin from link woudn't work on 1.6.1 version. doctor changed cn kernels on 1.6.1 version...

Thanks for the link, just tried and in fact its a better kernel for RX580 8GB.
Where did you get it, is it possible to get one for 4GB RX570/580, i only have 2 8GB cards

You can try to make these kernel bins yourself. Just try to run 4Gb cards with the next parameters:

        { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 58.0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false, "fragments": 43650010},

Maybe new kernel will be faster.

[UnclWish]

Wow, so many comments, thanks all

Multiple of 16 : that's a technical constraint due to how is my code. I cannot work with smaller multiples.

Cached pre-compile : not that simple, on JCE since the OpenCL code is generated, pre-optimized and injected on the fly, it's not just a per-GPU like for Stak. Not impossible to cache, but not trivial. I know that on a 8-gpu system it takes a long time.

Multihash... You must think about smaller multiples. It can make faster speed in many cases...

Pre-compiling... Also need something to do - it's to long wait every time...

[JCE-Miner]

I really cannot use a multiple smaller than 16, it would invalidate all my optims. I did a lot of data grouping by chuncks of 16, because that's 4x4. Going down to 2x2 would be impracticable.
About cached compile, that's possible, but more complicated than what Stak does.

And please, switch to the SRB topic for the SRB tips, it's not a rant, no problem to compare with SRB, even for me, but it's out of place and makes the topic harder to follow.

[s0ftcorn]

is there a better config for a RX580 8GB? With cast xmr i can get pretty much stable 1kH/s.

"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
]


EDIT: Algo is cryptonight heavy. Also the hashrate with JCE is much more stable. nice work!