JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
July 08, 2018, 08:16:59 PM Last edit: July 08, 2018, 09:31:52 PM by JCE-Miner |
|
Well configured, JCE is always above Gateless. My opponents are SRB, Claymore 11.3 and Cast. The Wolf-0 miners (Xmrig, Stak, Gateless...) at below now. Go to the Github page to get some optimal configs. CN-Heavy is a separate case where JCE is lower than others, i'm working on it. Version 0.31c out--doublecheck for CPU re-check (has negligeible impact on speed, even if you mine with CPU) Little CN-Heavy optim (but still disapointing) More complete error code if compile fails Blind fix for GPUs not recognized
Rx550 2gb CNv7 520hs That's were JCE is the best, the small RX on CN-v7 But why all those greeks, why did not you use like others, intensity, worksize etc named settings ? * worksize is the same as Stak * intensity is the same, but called multi_hash to be consistent with the CPU version, and because that's about multi-hash and not intensity: the higher is not always the faster, and doesn't push more your card. It just allocates more memory. * the greeks are fine-tuning settings, in order of importance. Alpha and beta have an impact on speed, rarely others, i admit. edit: As every time I try to optimize my CN-Heavy, I end with an optim that's good on... CN-v7 i've rebenched my HD7000s and got a nice +0.5% extra perf. Maybe it's faster on Vega or RX500 too.
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
July 08, 2018, 09:33:23 PM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
s0ftcorn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
|
|
July 08, 2018, 10:30:39 PM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's. is there any reason to still be using blockchain drivers?
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:16:19 AM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's. is there any reason to still be using blockchain drivers? I upgraded to 18.5.1, still the same problem. System has integrated graphics on motherboard. Is there a way to tell it to use gpu-platform 1, like in other miners?
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
July 09, 2018, 05:25:39 AM |
|
Integrated graphics? hooo, very important point. it means that not only my APU detection is broken but also kills the detect of other GPUs. i'll rewrite my code, thanks.
any feedback about the speed?
|
|
|
|
nordmann666
Member
Offline
Activity: 363
Merit: 16
|
|
July 09, 2018, 07:30:37 AM |
|
any recommendation about settings for heavy algo on vega?
|
|
|
|
QuirkSilver
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 13
|
|
July 09, 2018, 07:53:31 AM |
|
Rx550 2gb CNv7 520hs That's were JCE is the best, the small RX on CN-v7 Hey man, Good job with the miner. experimenting with more straps (nearly reach 590 h/s with your miner, however got rejects due to unstable clock/strap). There is a big problem though, how do you suggest { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : ..., "multi_hash":464 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : ..., "multi_hash":464 }, Which OS do you use lol? this intensity is insane... 5 month ago on elpidas maximum i could get with GG (old) was 448, hynix would BSOD. NOW, with all the bloatware from microsoft over the past months and amd drivers i can only set intensity to 25-26 (SRB, equivalent to 400-408 here) in your miner howver, the maximum i was able to get to work was: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":448 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":416 } Do you think i have a problem with 18.3.4 driver, Windows 10 1709
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 09, 2018, 09:22:01 AM Last edit: July 09, 2018, 10:26:20 AM by UnclWish |
|
Rx550 2gb CNv7 520hs That's were JCE is the best, the small RX on CN-v7 Hey man, Good job with the miner. experimenting with more straps (nearly reach 590 h/s with your miner, however got rejects due to unstable clock/strap). There is a big problem though, how do you suggest { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : ..., "multi_hash":464 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : ..., "multi_hash":464 }, Which OS do you use lol? this intensity is insane... 5 month ago on elpidas maximum i could get with GG (old) was 448, hynix would BSOD. NOW, with all the bloatware from microsoft over the past months and amd drivers i can only set intensity to 25-26 (SRB, equivalent to 400-408 here) in your miner howver, the maximum i was able to get to work was: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":448 }, { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 2, "multi_hash":416 } Do you think i have a problem with 18.3.4 driver, Windows 10 1709 Set alpha to 64, this can increase speed about 3-5%. And install latest 18.6.1 driver. It also can add speed and srability.
|
|
|
|
ingvarfervent
|
|
July 09, 2018, 10:45:19 AM |
|
Hi, JCE-Miner Thanks for that very good miner Testing last 0.31a version. I have, like you, Ryzen 1600, but on 3600mhz I prefer manual config and decrease number of working core - best when 6, only new Bittube - 4. So, my results ( not very long test ) CN7 ~ 490 h/s CNlite ~ 1780 h/s newBittube ~ 180 h/s Don`t test heavy - no wallet for it. JCE-Miner, what hash you have at CN7, light and heavy ? Ppl, give me pool settings and wallet to test CNheavy algo
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 09, 2018, 11:14:52 AM |
|
Hi, JCE-Miner Thanks for that very good miner Testing last 0.31a version. I have, like you, Ryzen 1600, but on 3600mhz I prefer manual config and decrease number of working core - best when 6, only new Bittube - 4. So, my results ( not very long test ) CN7 ~ 490 h/s CNlite ~ 1780 h/s newBittube ~ 180 h/s Don`t test heavy - no wallet for it. JCE-Miner, what hash you have at CN7, light and heavy ? Ppl, give me pool settings and wallet to test CNheavy algo newBittube is not heavy algo? From speed looking like it's on heavy...
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
July 09, 2018, 11:51:11 AM |
|
It's a variation of Heavy.
|
|
|
|
restless
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:14:45 PM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's. is there any reason to still be using blockchain drivers? Win7 ... 18.x drivers don't allow to enable compute mode in Win7 :/ so I use blockchain driver or 15.12 (as its best for Claymore miners on old cards)
|
|
|
|
Lonnegan64
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 5
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:19:07 PM |
|
The BitTube code of the new GPU miner 0.31c seems to be broken. I immediately get rejected shares with that version. 0.30c instead works with the same settings.
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:20:17 PM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's. is there any reason to still be using blockchain drivers? Win7 ... 18.x drivers don't allow to enable compute mode in Win7 :/ so I use blockchain driver or 15.12 (as its best for Claymore miners on old cards) I don't know how old your cards, but I use Claymore 11.3 on my R9 270X 4Gb with latest 18.6.1 drivers on Windows 10. Speed is the same as on old drivers. There is no need to stay on so old drivers...
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:25:06 PM |
|
And install latest 18.6.1 driver. It also can add speed and srability.
Is it really faster than the dedicated AMD blockchain driver 22.19.659.0 alias 17.30 beta 8? It's not slower...
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
July 09, 2018, 12:31:38 PM |
|
Windows 7-64, blockchain drivers, 2 x Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 8GB: Detecting OpenCL-capable GPUs... No OpenCL-capable GPU found.
Works great on latest AMD drivers, Windows 10 and VEGA56's. is there any reason to still be using blockchain drivers? Win7 ... 18.x drivers don't allow to enable compute mode in Win7 :/ so I use blockchain driver or 15.12 (as its best for Claymore miners on old cards) I don't know how old your cards, but I use Claymore 11.3 on my R9 270X 4Gb with latest 18.6.1 drivers on Windows 10. Speed is the same as on old drivers. There is no need to stay on so old drivers... There IS if you need to stay with Windows 7, for what ever reason, I've got mine.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
July 09, 2018, 08:14:01 PM |
|
Bittube v2 has both the complexity of CN-Heavy and CN-IPBC. This is why it's clearly slower than others.
My opencl in the 0.31c was based on the pre-bittube code, sorry i just got confused with my own files and shipped the bad release. I reuploaded it. Same version, no other change, that's just to fix a bad zip upload.
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
|
July 09, 2018, 08:24:44 PM |
|
Is then bittube still CPU only with your miners ?
|
|
|
|
Lonnegan64
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 5
|
|
July 09, 2018, 08:59:43 PM |
|
Bittube v2 has both the complexity of CN-Heavy and CN-IPBC. This is why it's clearly slower than others.
My opencl in the 0.31c was based on the pre-bittube code, sorry i just got confused with my own files and shipped the bad release. I reuploaded it. Same version, no other change, that's just to fix a bad zip upload.
Great! And I works!
|
|
|
|
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 22
|
|
July 10, 2018, 05:19:25 AM |
|
Thanks!
Iamtutut: The cpu and gpu version always support the same set of forks, the missing Bittube in the zip of yesterday was just a package goof i fixed.
|
|
|
|
|