Bitcoin Forum
August 09, 2024, 08:11:17 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 119 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [JCE]Fast & stable CN/v8/Heavy/Tube/XHV miner, CPU+GPU, Vega56 1800+ RX580 1200+  (Read 90800 times)
User44a
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 2


View Profile
July 24, 2018, 09:21:07 AM
 #921

I have been runing vegas on windoz for nearlly a year now
One year without a single restart on Windows??   Shocked
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 24, 2018, 09:44:02 AM
 #922

I have been runing vegas on windoz for nearlly a year now
One year without a single restart on Windows??   Shocked
It's practically impossible...
Lonnegan64
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 37
Merit: 5


View Profile
July 24, 2018, 11:10:48 AM
 #923

It's practically impossible...
It's not. I have a couple of systems, too, which were rebootet last time several years ago. When the system is stable and auto updates are off, why should a system not run for years?  Huh
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 24, 2018, 12:19:11 PM
 #924

It's practically impossible...
It's not. I have a couple of systems, too, which were rebootet last time several years ago. When the system is stable and auto updates are off, why should a system not run for years?  Huh
Different weather conditions - thunder, f.e. Power disconnections. In all countries there is a planned power disconnections to support power lines, etc.
Updating drivers...
whotheff
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 762
Merit: 35


View Profile WWW
July 24, 2018, 05:18:00 PM
 #925

I had the chance to test JCE on an old 7750.
Tested 29a and 32a. They both exit with message:
1. No device configured to mine on. (when auto)
2. Invalid configuration for GPU thread 0: No OpenCL-capable GPU found, no GPU mining possible.. (when config.txt is used)

 Tried with XMRrig - 160h/s

lebuawu2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 2


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 05:01:04 AM
 #926

Hi All,

I have some issue when I set static diff high it's often pool connection drop, but if I set static diff low I don't have this problem.
my latency to pool is good around 30 ms. I used other miner in this case SRB with keepalive option don't have this issue even with statif diff high.
Any suggestion how to avoid this problem with JCE Miner?

https://imgur.com/a/QOJqsf6

Thanks.
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 22


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 05:42:50 AM
 #927

hello,

as an historically cpu miner, jce has no keep-alive yet, another feature i should take time to add. maybe use the default auto diff from your pool?

i tested the 18.5.1 drivers and the A8 FM2 apu isn't even recognized. the last OpenCL capable driver i found is 15.7
16.2 works but with no opencl, only OpenGL and directx.

about old HD7700: if you use Windows7, well it's just not supported. i tested old drivers 15.12 on Win8.1 and it runs fine on my hd7950 and 7790

speed jumps: lowering alpha or beta params sometimes help.
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 06:08:32 AM
 #928


speed jumps: lowering alpha or beta params sometimes help.
Alpha 64, beta 8. Can they be lower?
User44a
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 2


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 07:56:17 AM
 #929

It's practically impossible...
It's not. I have a couple of systems, too, which were rebootet last time several years ago. When the system is stable and auto updates are off, why should a system not run for years?  Huh
Are you talking about Windows systems? My PC at home is always running for a few months straight and I usually turn it off only to upgrade HW but that's Linux. I honestly never heard of Windows running for years. Congrats if you've managed to do that.
sxemini
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 1558
Merit: 69


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 08:32:57 AM
 #930

Never heard that windows is running for years? Linux is not the holy grail of operating systems, as some here are talking about.

Our Windows Server is running for years without a reboot. my pc at home run for several months without reboot and i work with it every day.

heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
July 25, 2018, 02:06:26 PM
 #931

@JCE-Miner.

The CN-Saber (bittube) algo is touted to be heavier than CN-heavy.  Yet the hashrates on the miner are same for both the algos. 
Is there some optimization that was done for cn-saber over cn-heavy?
KriptoGuruTR
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 564
Merit: 19


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 02:07:39 PM
 #932

Never heard that windows is running for years? Linux is not the holy grail of operating systems, as some here are talking about.

Our Windows Server is running for years without a reboot. my pc at home run for several months without reboot and i work with it every day.



MS has greatly improved reliability in the last 5 years. For me it lacks customization.
QuirkSilver
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 13


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 08:09:33 PM
 #933

@JCE-Miner.

The CN-Saber (bittube) algo is touted to be heavier than CN-heavy.  Yet the hashrates on the miner are same for both the algos. 
Is there some optimization that was done for cn-saber over cn-heavy?
Always noticed so when compared to loki.
QuirkSilver
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 13


View Profile
July 25, 2018, 08:12:54 PM
 #934

brah, if you can allow multi algo in the same window (without launching two seprate instances for heavy / normal etc. thats my issue with rigs, running multiple variants that are faster on a specific gpu.
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 22


View Profile
July 26, 2018, 04:32:08 AM
 #935

That's what i call multipool/multicoin, it's planned.

JCE has a good Cn-ipbc and a bad CN-heavy. since bittube is CN-ipbc plus CN-heavy, both compensate and it has good overall performance. i know my Heavy is bad on Vega but i'd need a real vega to bench on.
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 2


View Profile
July 26, 2018, 07:56:30 AM
Last edit: July 26, 2018, 08:22:03 AM by lebuawu2
 #936

That's what i call multipool/multicoin, it's planned.

JCE has a good Cn-ipbc and a bad CN-heavy. since bittube is CN-ipbc plus CN-heavy, both compensate and it has good overall performance. i know my Heavy is bad on Vega but i'd need a real vega to bench on.

Hi JCE,

just curious when new version will release? and what new feature will be implemented?

is that mean if you optimized CN-Heavy later, hash rate for CN-Saber (Bittube) will improve also?

if after sometimes (few hours) the hash rate become zero, should I lower cclock or mclock? because I try set lower intensity from 944 to 864 the hash rate still become zero after sometimes (few hours).

I try combination of setting for RX Vega 56 in CN-Saber (Bittube) so far the best I can achieve with JCE is 1550 h/s while SRB can reach more than 1600 h/s with the same cclock and mclock.

setting cclock 1480/900 and mclock 950/900.
JCE with driver 18.6.1 1550 h/s while SRB with driver 18.3.4 1600 h/s.
JCE with driver 18.3.4 cannot reach more than 1500 h/s.

Thanks.
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
July 26, 2018, 01:23:53 PM
 #937

That's what i call multipool/multicoin, it's planned.

JCE has a good Cn-ipbc and a bad CN-heavy. since bittube is CN-ipbc plus CN-heavy, both compensate and it has good overall performance. i know my Heavy is bad on Vega but i'd need a real vega to bench on.

I am actually talking about Polaris numbers. 
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 22


View Profile
July 26, 2018, 07:10:31 PM
Last edit: July 26, 2018, 07:59:01 PM by JCE-Miner
 #938

minor version 0.32b

Code:
Reworked a little of CN-Heavy
Not sure it's better on Vega...

Now i stop OpenCL changes and I focus on GPU Fan/Temp

If I success to improve Heavy, I expect Tube to be faster too, right.
lebuawu2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 176
Merit: 2


View Profile
July 26, 2018, 07:41:41 PM
Last edit: July 26, 2018, 07:52:05 PM by lebuawu2
 #939

minor version 0.32b

Code:
Reworked a little of CN-Heavy
Not sure it's better on Vega...

Now i stop OpenCL changes and I focus on GPU Fan/Temp

If I success to improve Heavy, I expect Tube to be faster too, right.

Hi JCE,

I tried mine on Haven and Bittube got a lot of rejected share.
Please help.

https://imgur.com/a/dmJFLbt

Thanks.
Iamtutut
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120
Merit: 131


View Profile
July 26, 2018, 07:47:55 PM
 #940

minor version 0.32b

Code:
Reworked a little of CN-Heavy
Not sure it's better on Vega...

Now i stop OpenCL changes and I focus on GPU Fan/Temp

If I success to improve Heavy, I expect Tube to be faster too, right.

Hi JCE,

I tried mine on Haven and Bittube got a lot of rejected share.
Please help.

Thanks.

lower your overclocking
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 ... 119 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!