Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 10:00:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 [1375] 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761529 times)
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:47:27 AM
 #27481

Could we feasably get 200Ktps with full TF using JSON transport?  Or will full TF just absolutely REQUIRE binary transport, regardless of the desired performance?

We could switch to 200 tps rate but it's not that cool as switching to 1'000 tps, is it?
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714860000
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714860000

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714860000
Reply with quote  #2

1714860000
Report to moderator
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:48:20 AM
 #27482

Would that be json related?

No. It's legacy of NRS web interface.
ThePatient
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:49:50 AM
 #27483

I'm new to NXT (as you can tell from my prior posts)....NXT is written in Java? Is it going to get re-written in C++ (if thats even possible)?
bithic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:51:27 AM
 #27484

Looks like jl777 is looking for some skilled developers to join his effort. His plan has merit. Watching with interest!

Me too.

It's interesting to see what possible use one can get out of an old system, which is completely different, has limitations that make it impractical, will be completely rewritten from scratch by the zerocoin guys and implemented as a stand-alone altcoin instead of a Bitcoin integration. I also have no idea what this imaginary "zerocoin API" is that he keeps talking about.

So I think he, indeed, needs some skilled developers to explain to him why this might not be such a good idea...

Meanwhile, if anyone interested in Zerocash (i.e. Zerocoin 2.0) and its possible integration with NXT, follow http://wiki.nxtcrypto.org/wiki/NxtCash - I will keep updating it as we go.


Watching NxtChg with interest too.  Grin
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:53:19 AM
 #27485

If this is true then we better stop telling people they can forge on their smartphones now, rather than later. Some promotional material may need to be changed to reflect a realistic cost of forging on a high TPS network.

It's possible to forge on smartphones even with 1000 tps. U confuse numbers I think.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 06:54:53 AM
 #27486


Count me in.  

I've been thinking about this whole 1000 TPS thing and have a basic question.  If ANYBODY can be the node that generates a block, but a node with a low rate data link can't support 1000TPS, then are we saying that the NXT TPS chain is only as strong / fast as its weakest link?  
I am guessing any node that can't keep up will automatically become blacklisted and they fall forever behind. Such low bandwidth nodes will need to run slim clients. Not sure how they will be able to send NXT

James

So we start by telling people they can forge NXT based on their stake, then blacklist them forever if they can't meet a certain level of performance?

If this is true then we better stop telling people they can forge on their smartphones now, rather than later. Some promotional material may need to be changed to reflect a realistic cost of forging on a high TPS network.
It is more a matter of bandwidth than processing, though at 1000TPS CPU power would probably be an issue. A smartphone with wifi that is fast enough might be able to keep up. Not sure though, at some point we probably need to get benchmarks on a variety of configurations.
As time goes on, everything gets faster and faster so maybe at first only high end smartphones can handle a sustained 1000TPS network, but later more and more can.
Unlike with BTC, as time goes on, more and more hardware can keep up

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:55:19 AM
 #27487

I'm new to NXT (as you can tell from my prior posts)....NXT is written in Java? Is it going to get re-written in C++ (if thats even possible)?

It's already rewritten in C#. Someone could rewrite it in C++, Delphi, JavaScript.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 06:57:50 AM
 #27488

As time goes on, everything gets faster and faster so maybe at first only high end smartphones can handle a sustained 1000TPS network, but later more and more can.

One of my old smartphones had constant 15 Mbps connection. I would be able to forge with 10'000 tps rate. U guys should stop and look at ur numbers again. U think they r big, but actually they r not.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 06:59:06 AM
 #27489

As time goes on, everything gets faster and faster so maybe at first only high end smartphones can handle a sustained 1000TPS network, but later more and more can.

One of my old smartphones had constant 15 Mbps connection. I would be able to forge with 10'000 tps rate. U guys should stop and look at ur numbers again. U think they r big, but actually they r not.
You are in modern world, not everyone is from tech advanced country

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:00:53 AM
 #27490

You are in modern world, not everyone is from tech advanced country

Do smartphones that can't have 1 Mbps link exist?
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 07:03:24 AM
 #27491

As time goes on, everything gets faster and faster so maybe at first only high end smartphones can handle a sustained 1000TPS network, but later more and more can.

One of my old smartphones had constant 15 Mbps connection. I would be able to forge with 10'000 tps rate. U guys should stop and look at ur numbers again. U think they r big, but actually they r not.

 Grin

The future is bright people

Edit....im waiting for the day when I can forge and buy stuff with my smartwatch & smartglass.

opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:04:15 AM
 #27492

As time goes on, everything gets faster and faster so maybe at first only high end smartphones can handle a sustained 1000TPS network, but later more and more can.

One of my old smartphones had constant 15 Mbps connection. I would be able to forge with 10'000 tps rate. U guys should stop and look at ur numbers again. U think they r big, but actually they r not.

Were not just discussing network utilization now, but also cpu processor.  Will smarphoes, raspis, etc be able to process that much load at 1Mtps, assumimg it had access to the required network bandwidth?
bithic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:04:43 AM
 #27493

emunie and etherium update:

Very active times in the next gen crypto space. I know laws aren't supposed to apply in crytoland, but crypto is getting big enough that it is overlapping the real world

Rumours of the incorporation of emunie seem to be fully confirmed. They are a UK company now, subject to all the laws of her Majesty. Probably a very wise move, considering all the potential liability a large scale IPO with uncertain results could incur. By incorporating, Dan has the ability to create golden parachutes, large salaries, dividends, etc.  Even long time fanboys of emunie are upset. Not sure of percentage ownership, but my guess is vast majority is owned by Dan. Shrewd financial operator, with dubious ability to predict crypto markets as evidenced by BCNext's hat.

This move to being fully incorporated makes emunie into Ripple 2.0! Since emunie won't have fiat gateways or external exchanges, the big impact will be in ease of use and raising the bar as to what people expect. I urge all client developers to study the emunie beta (if you can download it) to make sure we are doing all we can in the usability side. From what I have heard emunie has an excellent GUI and we can't ignore any excellence regardless of where it is.

If anybody knows of any actual functionality that NXT (of 2 months from now) lacks in comparison to emunie, please let me know so I can make sure we fill the gap.

On the etherium side, they actually listened to negative feedback on their IPO structure and pulled the IPO. Not sure if what they come back with will be simpler or more complicated, but they announced a testnet release. If anybody has any actual experience with their testnet please post what relevant things etherium has or could have.

We now have the funds to proactively outdo ALL the competition. As the leading second gen crypto, as long as we defend against competitors, we win. Oh, TF and 1000TPS makes us win too, but I just want to win even without that. Better to win by 1000 kilometers than by just a kilometer.

James

Good idea.

Also, it's been a while since I've checked in with eMunie, but I believe the claim is it will be able to handle credit card transaction volumes at very high speeds. We may have stiff competition on this front.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:06:09 AM
 #27494

Were not just discussing network utilization now, but also cpu processor.  Will smarphoes, raspis, etc be able to process that much load at 1Mtps, assumimg it had access to the required network bandwidth?

BCNext got rid of Bitcoin's scripts on purpose. This greatly lowered requirements to processing power.
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 07:07:05 AM
 #27495


Were not just discussing network utilization now, but also cpu processor.  Will smarphoes, raspis, etc be able to process that much load at 1Mtps, assumimg it had access to the required network bandwidth?

at the rate smartphones are progressing....cpu processing speeds will double in less than 24 months + 4G/Nxt gen ethernet(Google Fiber) ....to the moon! Grin

opticalcarrier
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:07:19 AM
 #27496

Could we feasably get 200Ktps with full TF using JSON transport?  Or will full TF just absolutely REQUIRE binary transport, regardless of the desired performance?

We could switch to 200 tps rate but it's not that cool as switching to 1'000 tps, is it?

Heck no!  Ok so whats keeping us from switching to binary transport now, i assume there will be a phase with client releases supporting either then eventally a client that only does binary?
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 07:08:00 AM
 #27497

You are in modern world, not everyone is from tech advanced country

Do smartphones that can't have 1 Mbps link exist?
bandwidth is sometimes hard to get that fast

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:08:28 AM
 #27498


AM contest vote!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444081.0

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 07:09:44 AM
 #27499

Ok so whats keeping us from switching to binary transport now, i assume there will be a phase with client releases supporting either then eventally a client that only does binary?

JSON loweres entry barrier for new core protocol coders.
jl777
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1132


View Profile WWW
February 02, 2014, 07:10:08 AM
 #27500

emunie and etherium update:

Very active times in the next gen crypto space. I know laws aren't supposed to apply in crytoland, but crypto is getting big enough that it is overlapping the real world

Rumours of the incorporation of emunie seem to be fully confirmed. They are a UK company now, subject to all the laws of her Majesty. Probably a very wise move, considering all the potential liability a large scale IPO with uncertain results could incur. By incorporating, Dan has the ability to create golden parachutes, large salaries, dividends, etc.  Even long time fanboys of emunie are upset. Not sure of percentage ownership, but my guess is vast majority is owned by Dan. Shrewd financial operator, with dubious ability to predict crypto markets as evidenced by BCNext's hat.

This move to being fully incorporated makes emunie into Ripple 2.0! Since emunie won't have fiat gateways or external exchanges, the big impact will be in ease of use and raising the bar as to what people expect. I urge all client developers to study the emunie beta (if you can download it) to make sure we are doing all we can in the usability side. From what I have heard emunie has an excellent GUI and we can't ignore any excellence regardless of where it is.

If anybody knows of any actual functionality that NXT (of 2 months from now) lacks in comparison to emunie, please let me know so I can make sure we fill the gap.

On the etherium side, they actually listened to negative feedback on their IPO structure and pulled the IPO. Not sure if what they come back with will be simpler or more complicated, but they announced a testnet release. If anybody has any actual experience with their testnet please post what relevant things etherium has or could have.

We now have the funds to proactively outdo ALL the competition. As the leading second gen crypto, as long as we defend against competitors, we win. Oh, TF and 1000TPS makes us win too, but I just want to win even without that. Better to win by 1000 kilometers than by just a kilometer.

James

Good idea.

Also, it's been a while since I've checked in with eMunie, but I believe the claim is it will be able to handle credit card transaction volumes at very high speeds. We may have stiff competition on this front.
I guess there is some small chance emunie's price controls doesn't create a downward spike and implodes, at least for a few months. Best to make NXT as strong as possible in all areas.

http://www.digitalcatallaxy.com/report2015.html
100+ page annual report for SuperNET
Pages: « 1 ... 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 [1375] 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!