waldocarter
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The Premier Digital Asset Management Ecosystem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 01:27:40 AM |
|
I just hate to see multipools eating hash rate like gays , increasing the diff and then when it raises they leave , leaving us with a fucking high diff. And then repeat . I mean wtf ...
That's why I have an idea that will fix the multipools doing coin hopping just like PPLNS fixed the pool hoppers. Unfortunately this would need a new coin to be created (and some minor development towards it), and I don't want to be that guy. Might be able to integrate that into an existing coin? Id love to hear the idea =) integrating to an existing coin would require a hard fork because it changes the dynamics of the block reward system and might even need to store some extra data on the block with the network info at the time of block creation (not sure if that is currently being collected)
|
|
|
|
MajikPiG
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
in doge we tryst
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 02:13:28 AM |
|
33 BTC buy order for Doge at cryptsy. Lulz! If I had 33 BTC to blow on a alt currency I would go with DGC or TAG.
there's a reason you don't have 33 BTC ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Well, it ain't 1 person with a 33BTC buy order. It's more like 330 ppl with avg 0.1 BTC buy order.
|
|
|
|
scarface
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Spectiv VR Crowdsale: 12/08/17
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 02:20:44 AM |
|
If you want to save Doge from slow decline start using RonPaulCoin owners strategy.
Doge has much bigger volume but you can do it in a bit different way.
First make massive dump of Doge in controlled way selling... oh the irony of having a coin named after Ron Paul and resorting to currency and market manipulation to maintain what little value there is in each coin. If you want to save Doge from slow decline, STOP FUCKING WITH THE OPEN MARKET, and take the market downswings and upswings in stride, like an adult. true that and they even say "safe from pump/dump" ahahahaha
|
▄▄████████████▄▄ ▄███▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀███▄▄ ▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀██▄ ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███ ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄█████████████▄ ▄██░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▌ ▐██░░░░░░░░▄█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄░░░░░░░░▀█▌ ▐██░░░░░░▄███▀▀███████████████▀▀██▄░░░░░░██▌ ████▄░░▄██▀███████▄██████▄████████▀██▄░░░▐██ ██░▀████▀██████████████████████████████▄░░██ ██░░░▀██▄█████████████████████████▄██▀▀██▄██ ██▌░░░░▀███▄████████▀▀▀▀███████▄██▀░░░░░▀███ ▐██░░░░░░░▀███▄▄███████████▄▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░██▌ ▐██░░░░░░░░░░▀▀████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌ ▀██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌ ▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀ ▀██▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀ ▀███▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄██▀ ▀████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄███▀ ▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀
| | | | | |
|
|
|
Hippie Tech
aka Amenstop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 02:22:10 AM |
|
I just hate to see multipools eating hash rate like gays , increasing the diff and then when it raises they leave , leaving us with a fucking high diff. And then repeat . I mean wtf ...
That's why I have an idea that will fix the multipools doing coin hopping just like PPLNS fixed the pool hoppers. Unfortunately this would need a new coin to be created (and some minor development towards it), and I don't want to be that guy. Might be able to integrate that into an existing coin? Id love to hear the idea =) integrating to an existing coin would require a hard fork because it changes the dynamics of the block reward system and might even need to store some extra data on the block with the network info at the time of block creation (not sure if that is currently being collected) So.. what part of "this is IFC all over again", did you not understand ? Both were built with the multi pools in mind. The pumper n dumpers that created these and other similar coins, wouldn't have it any other way.
|
|
|
|
waldocarter
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The Premier Digital Asset Management Ecosystem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 02:53:37 AM |
|
I just hate to see multipools eating hash rate like gays , increasing the diff and then when it raises they leave , leaving us with a fucking high diff. And then repeat . I mean wtf ...
That's why I have an idea that will fix the multipools doing coin hopping just like PPLNS fixed the pool hoppers. Unfortunately this would need a new coin to be created (and some minor development towards it), and I don't want to be that guy. Might be able to integrate that into an existing coin? Id love to hear the idea =) integrating to an existing coin would require a hard fork because it changes the dynamics of the block reward system and might even need to store some extra data on the block with the network info at the time of block creation (not sure if that is currently being collected) So.. what part of "this is IFC all over again", did you not understand ? Both were built with the multi pools in mind. The pumper n dumpers that created these and other similar coins, wouldn't have it any other way. and that's why my idea would need a new coin as it would clash with the multipool dumping concept of current established coins.
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 04:11:04 AM |
|
If anybody hates multipools because they fuck up altcoins, the solution is simple.
make a pool that mines the optimal coin, but pays out in DOGECOIN.
multiple problems solved in one go. why fuck with the fundamentals of the currency itself when you can up the ante instead?
game on.
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
viatorek
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 04:25:37 AM |
|
If anybody hates multipools because they fuck up altcoins, the solution is simple.
make a pool that mines the optimal coin, but pays out in DOGECOIN.
multiple problems solved in one go. why fuck with the fundamentals of the currency itself when you can up the ante instead?
game on.
so they will sell dogecoins ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) to cashout
|
|
|
|
kalus
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 263
let's make a deal.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 04:44:12 AM |
|
If anybody hates multipools because they fuck up altcoins, the solution is simple.
make a pool that mines the optimal coin, but pays out in DOGECOIN.
multiple problems solved in one go. why fuck with the fundamentals of the currency itself when you can up the ante instead?
game on.
so they will sell dogecoins ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) to cashout that's what we want though: people buying and selling dogecoins. that's the whole point of a currency. the difference is (if people who hate multipools are to be believed), the value gets 'sucked' out of the other altcoins to benefit dogecoin. If some enterprising user who believes in both 1) dogecoin and 2) auto-switching pools destroy altcoins should have the motivation to setup a switching pool in response to the existing multipools instead of whining about switching pools. if multipools are so destructive, then the same switching algorithms can also be used to benefit dogecoin, couldn't they?
|
DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
|
|
|
scarface
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Spectiv VR Crowdsale: 12/08/17
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 05:11:59 AM |
|
multipools and low prices are good for doge right now
it allows those that want to buy and hold doge do so at low prices
once block rewards go down and the coins is not the most profitable multipools will go away and we will have less sell orders thus prices will rise
|
▄▄████████████▄▄ ▄███▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░▀▀▀███▄▄ ▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀██▄ ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███ ▄██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄█████████████▄ ▄██░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄█████████░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█▌ ▐██░░░░░░░░▄█████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄░░░░░░░░▀█▌ ▐██░░░░░░▄███▀▀███████████████▀▀██▄░░░░░░██▌ ████▄░░▄██▀███████▄██████▄████████▀██▄░░░▐██ ██░▀████▀██████████████████████████████▄░░██ ██░░░▀██▄█████████████████████████▄██▀▀██▄██ ██▌░░░░▀███▄████████▀▀▀▀███████▄██▀░░░░░▀███ ▐██░░░░░░░▀███▄▄███████████▄▄██▀▀░░░░░░░░██▌ ▐██░░░░░░░░░░▀▀████████████▀░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌ ▀██▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████████▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄█▌ ▀███▀▀▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀ ▀██▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄██▀ ▀███▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄██▀ ▀████▄▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄███▀ ▀▀▀██████████▀▀▀
| | | | | |
|
|
|
bazzip
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 05:36:35 AM |
|
I actually cant believe the price of DOGE is staying where it is. There are tons produced everyday. Basically for the price to remain stable this means that people are buying or holding that number of coins per day on top of the amounts that are already made and bought and sold everyday.
|
DOGE wallet address: DSyvezAiSdTjQpcTCDarNftZxw3nvSGFrv
|
|
|
Hippie Tech
aka Amenstop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 05:37:21 AM |
|
I just hate to see multipools eating hash rate like gays , increasing the diff and then when it raises they leave , leaving us with a fucking high diff. And then repeat . I mean wtf ...
That's why I have an idea that will fix the multipools doing coin hopping just like PPLNS fixed the pool hoppers. Unfortunately this would need a new coin to be created (and some minor development towards it), and I don't want to be that guy. Might be able to integrate that into an existing coin? Id love to hear the idea =) integrating to an existing coin would require a hard fork because it changes the dynamics of the block reward system and might even need to store some extra data on the block with the network info at the time of block creation (not sure if that is currently being collected) So.. what part of "this is IFC all over again", did you not understand ? Both were built with the multi pools in mind. The pumper n dumpers that created these and other similar coins, wouldn't have it any other way. and that's why my idea would need a new coin as it would clash with the multipool dumping concept of current established coins. Supporting one of the few good alts like ANC, LTC, FTC, is a better idea. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
tazcatlicoatlus
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 06:50:06 AM |
|
When is there going to be a USD/DOGE Dogebase?
There is a very high demand for Doge in USD
|
The Jesuits = The Money Changers - Executive order 11110, Green Hilton Memorial Agreement, Global collateral accounts.. The US Treasury needs to print United States Notes backed by any physical assets; unlike this debt tool 'federal reserve note' printed by a private central bank that is 100% unconstitutional
|
|
|
Bitcoin Machine
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 08:17:38 AM |
|
Supporting one of the few good alts like ANC, LTC, FTC, is a better idea. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Those maybe good coins. But Doge is a great coin! Like BTC. But if ANC is so good then why does it only have a trade volume of $20,752? DOGE has a trade volume of $173,588 which is better than FTC too. Many people use Doge for tipping, online games, products and services. This is growing everyday. A coin is only as good as it's usefulness. Dogecoin has a very useful niche and winning hearts of many.
|
|
|
|
Kergekoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 08:21:44 AM |
|
Not exactly shibe, but thats one smiley DOGE ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSHzZV9I.jpg&t=665&c=WqY4iY28AzKNyA) Good morning everyone! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
syrusek
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 08:47:41 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Wekkel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1531
yes
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 08:48:19 AM |
|
Everybody loves Shibe ..
|
|
|
|
fcrypto7
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 09:05:03 AM |
|
Everybody loves Shibe ..
Yea! And I know what happen if someone doesn't love shibe. Sometime in this thread was hateful posts. They disappear. Why? Because dogehaters can see doge everywhere. And haters destroyed their monitors ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2F25.media.tumblr.com%2F01d5173f5afb8bfe79e78ebd00c34b6d%2Ftumblr_msb2fn3mbE1syvf3yo1_250.gif&t=665&c=1hiPngyb6LYSqw)
|
|
|
|
waldocarter
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 100
The Premier Digital Asset Management Ecosystem
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 09:19:51 AM |
|
2) auto-switching pools destroy altcoins
should have the motivation to setup a switching pool in response to the existing multipools instead of whining about switching pools. if multipools are so destructive, then the same switching algorithms can also be used to benefit dogecoin, couldn't they?
oh, so instead of creating a new method to defend against the erosive nature of multipools we just fuck every other alt coin? what's stopping others doing a multipool that pays in shitcoin? I don't want a race to the bottom.
|
|
|
|
paddypaws
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 09, 2014, 09:53:30 AM |
|
2) auto-switching pools destroy altcoins
should have the motivation to setup a switching pool in response to the existing multipools instead of whining about switching pools. if multipools are so destructive, then the same switching algorithms can also be used to benefit dogecoin, couldn't they?
[/quote I don't want a race to the bottom.
+1
|
DBM7Z6SqBDnwdn68VmQbDQtSxEKF8Vbqh3
|
|
|
|