Bitcoin Forum
July 21, 2017, 03:15:11 AM *
News: The warning which may be displayed by Bitcoin Core about unknown versions is related to BIP91, and can be safely ignored.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
  Print  
Author Topic: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin  (Read 209036 times)
Technocrat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 09:17:41 PM
 #961

if someone buys them, they have value even if they are nothing more than digital paper weights right now.
but read a page back or two, paper weights might actually turn back into currency soon.
Yes, you are right. Demand sets the price.
But the only way to trade I0coins now is to send your wallet.dat.
This was supposed to be a joke currency and people got too serious about it.
The founder has disappeared. Is I0coins dead?
Decentralized search
Search for products or services and get paid for it
pre-sale Token CAT
25 July 50% discount
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1500606911
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1500606911

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1500606911
Reply with quote  #2

1500606911
Report to moderator
1500606911
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1500606911

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1500606911
Reply with quote  #2

1500606911
Report to moderator
jackjack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 09:21:39 PM
 #962

But the only way to trade I0coins now is to send your wallet.dat.
Do you realize how false your sentence is?

The founder has disappeared. Is I0coins dead?
Welcome to the open-source world
Enjoy your stay

Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
Technocrat
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 09:48:12 PM
 #963

Do you realize how false your sentence is?
Actually I don't. Maybe I'm just stupid. So you can still send I0coins?
d.james
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280

Firstbits: 12pqwk


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 09:48:20 PM
 #964

The founder has disappeared. Is I0coins dead?

Yes bitcoin is dead because Satoshi disappeared.

You can not roll a BitCoin, but you can rollback some. Cheesy
Roll me back: 1NxMkvbYn8o7kKCWPsnWR4FDvH7L9TJqGG
ArtForz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 10:03:17 PM
 #965

Actually, just realized something... as ix will also switch to 3-min blocks but has 96 coins/block... that's twice our inflation rate... can't have that.
so... either also switch to 96 coins/block (boooring!) or go to 90 seconds/block target while keeping the 48 coin reward.
At 90 sec/block... change retarget to every 120 blocks (= every 3h nominal), keep the *1.1 /4 limit per retarget, change block acceptance rules so blocks can't be more than 5min or so in the future (we still use bitcoins 120min, but we have way more accurate time thanks to integrated NTP...)
And while we're at it, go to diff 256 instead of 4096 after block 14639.
"special" enough?

bitcoin: 1Fb77Xq5ePFER8GtKRn2KDbDTVpJKfKmpz
i0coin: jNdvyvd6v6gV3kVJLD7HsB5ZwHyHwAkfdw
d.james
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280

Firstbits: 12pqwk


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 10:16:34 PM
 #966

sounds good on paper, at difficulty of 256, it's going to lure a small number miners to get in on this.
wish we can test it out in someway, but this thing might actually turn out to be an improved version of solidcoin after all.
we'll just have to wait and see.

You can not roll a BitCoin, but you can rollback some. Cheesy
Roll me back: 1NxMkvbYn8o7kKCWPsnWR4FDvH7L9TJqGG
fusebox
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
August 28, 2011, 11:55:56 PM
 #967

Actually, just realized something... as ix will also switch to 3-min blocks but has 96 coins/block... that's twice our inflation rate... can't have that.
so... either also switch to 96 coins/block (boooring!) or go to 90 seconds/block target while keeping the 48 coin reward.
At 90 sec/block... change retarget to every 120 blocks (= every 3h nominal), keep the *1.1 /4 limit per retarget, change block acceptance rules so blocks can't be more than 5min or so in the future (we still use bitcoins 120min, but we have way more accurate time thanks to integrated NTP...)
And while we're at it, go to diff 256 instead of 4096 after block 14639.
"special" enough?

Fine with me.. can you tell me the code to change and I'll do it.. or maybe there's a way to add you to the project.... I'm still working on getting this damn thing to compile ( worked on the prereqs this morning before life happened and fininishing that up now).
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 01:28:13 AM
 #968

Well, once theres reasonable consensus on what the new algo should be, it's just a matter of changing the constants and finding a suck... masochi... kind soul to build binaries.
Probably not a too good idea to open a exchange back up before "everyone" switched and the network gets at least a few dozen Ghps.
Yeah, I'll enable the exchange once it's been running for a bit and seems to be working ok. I'll update my pool with the new code though to help move it along.
ditchmagnet
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 52


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 01:59:21 AM
 #969

So can we actually mine IOcoin yet?  I didn't want to read all through the pages, and there is nothing about it in the OP.
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428


MIV Crowdfunding - 18 July


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 03:57:33 AM
 #970

So can we actually mine IOcoin yet?  I didn't want to read all through the pages, and there is nothing about it in the OP.
you're late to the party.


 ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███
███████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████▀█▀███████
████████████████████████████████
███████████▀█████▀██████████████
██████████▌████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
████████████▀███████████████████
███████▀████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀






fusebox
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:16:51 AM
 #971

Actually, just realized something... as ix will also switch to 3-min blocks but has 96 coins/block... that's twice our inflation rate... can't have that.
so... either also switch to 96 coins/block (boooring!) or go to 90 seconds/block target while keeping the 48 coin reward.
At 90 sec/block... change retarget to every 120 blocks (= every 3h nominal), keep the *1.1 /4 limit per retarget, change block acceptance rules so blocks can't be more than 5min or so in the future (we still use bitcoins 120min, but we have way more accurate time thanks to integrated NTP...)
And while we're at it, go to diff 256 instead of 4096 after block 14639.
"special" enough?

Ok, checked in most these changes... except..
>And while we're at it, go to diff 256 instead of 4096 after block 14639.

Not exactly sure how to do that.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:19:26 AM
 #972

Firstly https://i0exchange.bitparking.com/ doesn't seem to work any more (after you login it fails)

Secondly, why on earth are people hacking with the code other than to fix the current problems?

Seriously, just use that patch, make a new one and we'll be done.

Copying some other coin ideas and agreeing coz one person posted a comment here on the forum is not a good excuse to be causing more problems
Every other coin who has been making changes keeps screwing up - so don't follow in their footsteps and just fix the current problem.

Pool: https://kano.is Here on Bitcointalk: Forum BTC: 1KanoPb8cKYqNrswjaA8cRDk4FAS9eDMLU
FreeNode IRC: irc.freenode.net channel #kano.is Majority developer of the ckpool code
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with full block verification on all blocks - and NO empty blocks!
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1120


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 29, 2011, 06:19:37 AM
 #973

This one still stands Smiley

Quote
I would like to setup a bounty for fixing i0coins:

200 i0coins for the one who fixes it!

Who wants to add some more? Quote and add your name to the list!

Bounty list:
MaGNeT - 200 i0coins
d.james - 400 i0coins

Total - 600 i0coins

Remember, we can only pay the bounty if the network is up again  Grin


 
 
           ▄████▄
         ▄████████▄
       ▄████████████▄
     ▄████████████████▄
    ████████████████████      ▄█▄                 ▄███▄                 ▄███▄                 ▄████████████████▀   ▄██████████

  ▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄▄▀█████▀▄▄▄     ▀██▄             ▄██▀ ▀██▄             ▄██▀ ▀██▄             ▄██▀                   ██
▄█████▄▀▀▀▄██████▄▀▀▀▄█████▄     ▀██▄         ▄██▀     ▀██▄         ▄██▀     ▀██▄         ▄██▀        ▄█▄          ▀██████████████▄
████████████████████████████       ▀██▄     ▄██▀         ▀██▄     ▄██▀         ▀██▄     ▄██▀          ▀█▀                        ██
 ▀████████████████████████▀          ▀██▄ ▄██▀             ▀██▄ ▄██▀     ▄█▄     ▀██▄ ▄██▀                                       ██
   ▀████████████████████▀              ▀███▀                 ▀███▀       ▀█▀       ▀███▀      ▄███████████████████████████████████▀
     ▀████████████████▀
       ▀████████████▀
         ▀████████▀
           ▀████▀
║║


║║
.
.

║║
██
║║
.
.

║║
██
║║
.
║║


║║
fusebox
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:27:33 AM
 #974

Secondly, why on earth are people hacking with the code other than to fix the current problems?

Because the entire network is down and now is the time to fix it (ie no one has published working binaries yet which everyone will need to upgrade too).   Either way these were trivial changes.  Now back to getting this windows binary compiling (I suspect linux users probabaly can easily rebuild and restart thier nodes anytime they wish and will once some people confirm they are up and generating blocks again).

Unless someone posts a quick way to reset the difficulty target for restart in the code.. the probabbaly is the last change (unless someone else takes the reigns and makes thier own forks).
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:29:12 AM
 #975

Firstly https://i0exchange.bitparking.com/ doesn't seem to work any more (after you login it fails)
Works fine for me, PM me your error if you're getting one.
doublec
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:36:14 AM
 #976

Unless someone posts a quick way to reset the difficulty target for restart in the code.. the probabbaly is the last change (unless someone else takes the reigns and makes thier own forks).
The NTP code was broken in the original release. It would cause i0coind to hang if the NTP server didn't respond. It'd be good if that can be fixed. I disabled the NTP code on my systems otherwise it was too reliable.
ArtForz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:41:36 AM
 #977

for the switch-to-256 thing...
Code:
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -726,6 +726,9 @@ unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast)
 //okay, maybe not this line
     if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) < 14640)
        return GetNextWorkRequired_OLD(pindexLast);
+    //hardcoded switch to 256.0 difficulty at block 14639
+    if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) == 14640)
+        return 0x1C00FFFF;
 
     // Only change once per interval
     if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) % nInterval != 0)
should work ?

bitcoin: 1Fb77Xq5ePFER8GtKRn2KDbDTVpJKfKmpz
i0coin: jNdvyvd6v6gV3kVJLD7HsB5ZwHyHwAkfdw
ArtForz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:42:22 AM
 #978

right, the NTP hangs... let's see how hard adding a short timeout would be...

bitcoin: 1Fb77Xq5ePFER8GtKRn2KDbDTVpJKfKmpz
i0coin: jNdvyvd6v6gV3kVJLD7HsB5ZwHyHwAkfdw
fusebox
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35


View Profile
August 29, 2011, 06:47:28 AM
 #979

for the switch-to-256 thing...
Code:
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -726,6 +726,9 @@ unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast)
 //okay, maybe not this line
     if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) < 14640)
        return GetNextWorkRequired_OLD(pindexLast);
+    //hardcoded switch to 256.0 difficulty at block 14639
+    if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) == 14640)
+        return 0x1C00FFFF;
 
     // Only change once per interval
     if ((pindexLast->nHeight+1) % nInterval != 0)
should work ?

ok.. duh... should have figured that out... Smiley ... committed.  thanks.
caston
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 724



View Profile WWW
August 29, 2011, 07:03:52 AM
 #980

Do you realise how ironic this is?

18jL18iH96BBhwUCQn27FQp7ocodSxvJAB
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!