[ANN][MOON] Mooncoin: You know where it's headed! KGW exploit FIXED 4/3/2014

[chopper873]

Reduction to ~25000 MOON mining-reward in less than 500 blocks (now we are at block 374587 - reduction takes place at block 375001).

And price is very cheap...!

This should increase the price right? Is this moon's first halving?

[coinflow]

Reduction to ~25000 MOON mining-reward in less than 500 blocks (now we are at block 374587 - reduction takes place at block 375001).

And price is very cheap...!

This should increase the price right? Is this moon's first halving?

It's like this (from the initial posting):

--
Block rewards:

Blocks 1-100,000: 0-2,000,000 MOON
Blocks 100,001-200,000: 0-1,000,000 MOON
Blocks 200,001-250,000: 0-600,000 MOON
Blocks 250,001-300,000: 0-350,000 MOON
Blocks 300,001-350,000: 0-175,000 MOON
Blocks 350,001-375,000: 0-100,000 MOON
Blocks 375,001-384,400: 0-50,000 MOON ---> we're here now, since ~400 blocks

All future blocks are a fixed 29531 MOON.
--

[BTCat]

What's with https://www.swisscex.com
Wallet seems to be unavailable for MOON.
A freshly generated address isn't recognized: Address seems to be invalid

[agswinner]

What's with https://www.swisscex.com
Wallet seems to be unavailable for MOON.
A freshly generated address isn't recognized: Address seems to be invalid

Wallet swisscex offline

[agswinner]

Total used addresses:    622764
Total funded addresses:    43225
Total empty addresses:    579539

[agswinner]

What's with https://www.swisscex.com
Wallet seems to be unavailable for MOON.
A freshly generated address isn't recognized: Address seems to be invalid

@MooncoinItalia: Wallet #moon on @swisscex back online #altcoin #cryptocurrencies

[BTCat]

@MooncoinItalia: Wallet #moon on @swisscex back online #altcoin #cryptocurrencies

Great thanks for letting us know. 

[agswinner]

https://chocolatey.org/packages/mooncoin/1.862.1

 

[agswinner]

Dump and price very cheap....

[agswinner]

Big volume 11,7 Btc...
The understimated coin

[agswinner]

Total used addresses:    623455
Total funded addresses:    43259
Total empty addresses:    580196

[dogechode]

Hey, is this coin dead or what? The mooncoin.info page is dead, what is the latest wallet version and is it hosted anywhere legitimate? Do any exchanges carry mooncoin anymore?

Thanks guys...

[coinflow]

Hey, is this coin dead or what? The mooncoin.info page is dead, what is the latest wallet version and is it hosted anywhere legitimate? Do any exchanges carry mooncoin anymore?

Thanks guys...

The new pages: http://mooncoin.rocks (wallet and more) and www.mooncoin.com (general information)
Check this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.msg9456299#msg9456299

[coinflow]

https://chocolatey.org/packages/mooncoin/1.862.1

 

I've just checked that site once again.
If you read here: https://chocolatey.org/about, it says this:

Why is my software listed here? I haven't given anyone distribution permission! Many times the way Chocolatey works is to use PowerShell to download the package from the official distribution point, this way no distribution rules are broken. This is not always the case so feel free to reach out to the site administrators (the email address is chocolateywebadmin at google groups dot com) if you do have questions.

How do I know if I can trust the community feed (the packages on this site?) Until we have package moderation in place, the answer is that you can't trust the packages here. If you require trust (e.g. most organizations require this), you should have an internal feed with vetted packages using internal resources. You should always decide whether you trust the maintainer(s) of the package, and even then you may want to inspect the package prior to installing. You can inspect packages easily with nuget package explorer or by clicking download on the package page (and then treating the nupkg as a zip archive).

So the question is, whether the Mooncoin-package there is the official/original one from GitHub?

[agswinner]

Total used addresses:    623995
Total funded addresses:    43290
Total empty addresses:    580705

[BTCat]

Is MOON going back to 3 sat? I think so 

[CryptoDatabase]

https://chocolatey.org/packages/mooncoin/1.862.1

 

I've just checked that site once again.
If you read here: https://chocolatey.org/about, it says this:

Why is my software listed here? I haven't given anyone distribution permission! Many times the way Chocolatey works is to use PowerShell to download the package from the official distribution point, this way no distribution rules are broken. This is not always the case so feel free to reach out to the site administrators (the email address is chocolateywebadmin at google groups dot com) if you do have questions.

How do I know if I can trust the community feed (the packages on this site?) Until we have package moderation in place, the answer is that you can't trust the packages here. If you require trust (e.g. most organizations require this), you should have an internal feed with vetted packages using internal resources. You should always decide whether you trust the maintainer(s) of the package, and even then you may want to inspect the package prior to installing. You can inspect packages easily with nuget package explorer or by clicking download on the package page (and then treating the nupkg as a zip archive).

So the question is, whether the Mooncoin-package there is the official/original one from GitHub?

As a rule of thumb it is usually safer to go directly to the source instead of downloading from 3rd party websites.

On my site I have download links for wallets that I offer faucets for, the links are from the official website and are not my own for example.

http://downloads.mooncoin.rocks/Mooncoin-1.862.1.7z Windows wallet

http://downloads.mooncoin.rocks/Mooncoin-Qt-1.862.1-Mac.zip Mac wallet

[agswinner]

Is MOON going back to 3 sat? I think so 

Satoshi? Yes i think ...

[coinflow]

https://chocolatey.org/packages/mooncoin/1.862.1

 

I've just checked that site once again.
If you read here: https://chocolatey.org/about, it says this:

Why is my software listed here? I haven't given anyone distribution permission! Many times the way Chocolatey works is to use PowerShell to download the package from the official distribution point, this way no distribution rules are broken. This is not always the case so feel free to reach out to the site administrators (the email address is chocolateywebadmin at google groups dot com) if you do have questions.

How do I know if I can trust the community feed (the packages on this site?) Until we have package moderation in place, the answer is that you can't trust the packages here. If you require trust (e.g. most organizations require this), you should have an internal feed with vetted packages using internal resources. You should always decide whether you trust the maintainer(s) of the package, and even then you may want to inspect the package prior to installing. You can inspect packages easily with nuget package explorer or by clicking download on the package page (and then treating the nupkg as a zip archive).

So the question is, whether the Mooncoin-package there is the official/original one from GitHub?

As a rule of thumb it is usually safer to go directly to the source instead of downloading from 3rd party websites.

On my site I have download links for wallets that I offer faucets for, the links are from the official website and are not my own for example.

http://downloads.mooncoin.rocks/Mooncoin-1.862.1.7z Windows wallet

http://downloads.mooncoin.rocks/Mooncoin-Qt-1.862.1-Mac.zip Mac wallet

Yes, that's right. My posting was more to illustrate, that it could be risky to download from there.
Does anybody know more about Chocolatey?

[gogota]

Is MOON going back to 3 sat? I think so 

mooncoin going bankrupt already. You can buy hell of a lot of moon with 10 USD now