Ok , my point was just MOON had lowest volumes.
Lets talk some numbers;
CRYPTSY:
at 13th March ; ~11 million (2.53 LTC~5 USD)
at 14th March ; ~33 million (7.6 LTC~15 USD)
at 15th March ; ~113 million (26 LTC~51 USD)
What I wanted to say , with very low volume it doesnt have stable price. There are lots of coins with <sarcasm>VERY stable price</sarcasm> due to no volume. However when you try to buy/sell a few of them price sharply increase/decrease.
If you say still "Ok, but we have stable price", then I just respect it.
I have seen a couple of times 10+ BTC volume for MOON. And I believe for a healthy progress we need at least 1 billion volume daily. Yesterday and today we have higher volumes. As long as we have enough volume, yes youre right we have stable price.
Finally, we are all on same boat and I just want MOON to attract more people , not people losing their interest on it.
P.S: I didnt look at Bleutrade's MOON volume for a couple weeks , its getting more volume now. I can think to move some of my MOON to bleutrade.
Regarding the volume, you're right. Good volume is always nice, as it goes along with liquidity, so that those who want to sell, can actually sell. But on the other hand, lets look at it that way, that MOON has worked its way up from ~2 Litoshi to now a "stable" 20 Litoshi, meanwhile even peaking at ~60. Then there was the hacker-attack ...
If you look at the other currencies, they all have
relatively low volumes now, compared to some weeks before, let alone comparing to the end of 2013.
I think it all depends on what BTC (and LTC) are going to do. For BTC it is the question: will it go above 300 USD - and when? And if so, will it stay there? If the answer is yes, it will most probably go up for BTC much further and then the others will tag along with it.
I hope that peme is back again soon, so that he can continue development and the investigation regarding the hack.
