[ANN] microCoin MRC - alcurEX - Scrypt-Jane - nFactor

[halibit]

Looks like there is not right amount.

[mobile2004]

epic fail ))))

[Nutnut]

Ummm... DEV..... 

MCR - come on man.... Your coin needs you!

[zhcy123]

0.01   ......... is bad

[zstanic]

#315015
Party is over!!!
New block amount - 0.01!
 

[halibit]

We need new fix I think.

I don't get how block size can be 0.01 with this code?

Code:

        {
				if (nHeight <= 315000) 	nSubsidy = (310000 - ((nHeight - 310000) * 0.01)) * COIN; 
				 if	 (nHeight > 315000) nSubsidy = (3100 - ((nHeight * 0.01) -310000)) - 300000; //Blockreward fixed decreasing 0.01 steps
				if (nSubsidy <= 1000) nSubsidy = 1000; // Rest of blocks are 1000 coins. Then network working forever with stake blocks.
		}

[Nutnut]

We need new fix I think.

PMSL!

MCR - PLEASE CONTACT ME VIA THE SUPPORT DESK ON THE POOL WHEN YOU HAVE A FIX.

I will get the pools mining wallets updated right away so the miners are back to normal.

Provided our wallets are updated, miners needn't rush to update their wallets. I would recommend whilst in this state of flux where a new wallet will likely be released with 0 notice, nobody should should make any MRC transactions.

Now - back to my BBQ!

Nut

[reftop123]

That is F**ING AWESOME!
 

DEV RULEZZZ!!!

[halibit]

Well.. Better that way. Now there there is not anyone get new coins until wallet is fixed.

[randywald]

Should i close my wallet until new wallet can be downloaded?

[bykardinal]

how long time block reward will be 0,01 ?

[tygarbyte]

Should i close my wallet until new wallet can be downloaded?

don't need to have wallet open all the time, just sync/back it up once a week or before you do an update.

[halibit]

Chaging correct block reward, It will be same kind of "hard fork" as this one was.
Wallets can use normally.

edit. I test transfer old blocks with new wallet and it's working normally. But don't use old wallet for transfers.

[reftop123]

Let's wait for the dev, he is at school now, gettin' another "F" on math  
Then his father beats him, and after that he will "FIX" that again. I think reward 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is fine.
Because this is so good for coin, lots of errors make it strong and good looking for investors.
 

[halibit]

Let's wait for the dev, he is at school now, gettin' another "F" on math  
Then his father beats him, and after that he will "FIX" that again. I think reward 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is fine.
Because this is so good for coin, lots of errors make it strong and good looking for investors.
 

How about if we let blockreward to 0.01, then we have nice lot .
Just kidding  
Sure block reward need to fix as it was planned to be.

Actually I need to tell, this one was my bad. I calculate the code fix.
Don't kill me 

[svennand]

Let's wait for the dev, he is at school now, gettin' another "F" on math  
Then his father beats him, and after that he will "FIX" that again. I think reward 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is fine.
Because this is so good for coin, lots of errors make it strong and good looking for investors.
 

How about if we let blockreward to 0.01, then we have nice lot .
Just kidding  
Sure block reward need to fix as it was planned to be.

Actually I need to tell, this one was my bad. I calculate the code fix.
Don't kill me 

I'll take a quick look. What is the COIN value?

[Nutnut]

Let's wait for the dev, he is at school now, gettin' another "F" on math  
Then his father beats him, and after that he will "FIX" that again. I think reward 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is fine.
Because this is so good for coin, lots of errors make it strong and good looking for investors.
 

How about if we let blockreward to 0.01, then we have nice lot .
Just kidding  
Sure block reward need to fix as it was planned to be.

Actually I need to tell, this one was my bad. I calculate the code fix.
Don't kill me 

If it can't be properly fixed very soon i recommend setting the block value to a static 9 or 10k just to get mining running again. We can then fix the code properly at our/your leisure.

Nut

[luohuiao]

if (nHeight <= 315000)    nSubsidy = (310000 - ((nHeight - 310000) * 0.01)) * COIN;
if(nHeight > 315000) nSubsidy = ((3100 - ((nHeight * 0.01) -310000)) - 300000) * COIN; //Blockreward fixed decreasing 0.01 steps
if (nSubsidy <= 1000) nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN; // Rest of blocks are 1000 coins. Then network working forever with stake blocks.


this is the right code.

OR:

if (nHeight <= 315000)    nSubsidy = (310000 - ((nHeight - 310000) * 0.01)) * COIN;
if(nHeight > 315000) nSubsidy = (13100-nHeight * 0.01) * COIN; //Blockreward fixed decreasing 0.01 steps
if (nSubsidy <= 1000) nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN; // Rest of blocks are 1000 coins. Then network working forever with stake blocks.

[luohuiao]

The reward value equils nSubsidy/COIN in the end.

[snguyen]

We need new fix I think.

I don't get how block size can be 0.01 with this code?

Code:

        {
				if (nHeight <= 315000) 	nSubsidy = (310000 - ((nHeight - 310000) * 0.01)) * COIN; 
				 if	 (nHeight > 315000) nSubsidy = (3100 - ((nHeight * 0.01) -310000)) - 300000; //Blockreward fixed decreasing 0.01 steps
				if (nSubsidy <= 1000) nSubsidy = 1000; // Rest of blocks are 1000 coins. Then network working forever with stake blocks.
		}

The code is wrong again.

I was the first one found the bug, PMed MCR and halibit, posted here the correct code, but no one wanted to hear me.

I will post here the correct code again. Let review it together, and hope this time you make it correct.

else if (nHeight >= 310000 && nHeight <= 315000) // 310,000 block rewards, decreasing 0.01 on every block
{
   nSubsidy = (310000 - ((nHeight - 310000) * 0.01)) * COIN;
}

else if (nHeight <= 320000) // 0.01 block rewards (wrong logic as coin spec, but we need to keep it because it's already happened)
{
   nSubsidy = (3100 - ((nHeight * 0.01) - 310000)) - 300000;
}

else
{
   nSubsidy = (10000 - ((nHeight - 320000) * 0.01)) * COIN;
   if (nSubsidy <= 1000 * COIN) nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN; // Rest of blocks are 1000 coins. Then network working forever with stake blocks.
}

Again, we need to pick another block number to apply this patch. Say it 320,000. New logic will be:

• Before block 310,000: Same
• Block 310,001 - 315,000: Block rewards from 310,000, reducing 0.01 each block (already happened)
• Block 315,001 - 320,000: Block rewards = 0.01 (happening - current block at the time of writing is 315143)
• Block 320,001+: Block rewards from 10,000, reducing 0.01 each block. And it will stop reducing at 1,000. (will happen at Block 1220001)

This new scheme we have 5000 blocks of 0.01 rewards, we can call it "calming down" period