ICO Reviews, trust them or NOT?

[Burogh]

We should not give all our trust on every review or analysis. We take that as our second opinion and our decision depending on our self. Some ICOs reviews are good and we can use it before make decision to invest

[1714470315]

1714470315

[1714470315]

1714470315

[1714470315]

1714470315

[BoxerRobert]

Don't believe all those reviews blindly. Because there is lot paid review also is there. All ICO review website and video mostly they are giving a good rating for paid project. Few weeks back I saw some article in Linkedin with proof. One project got a bad review in ICOBeanch within a few weeks they got a good review from ICOBeanch and many more scam review also is there. You do your own research.

[marksayson]

It is good to build trust in the ico review sites since they give further research about the project. But you should also make your own research about the project and the decision of making investment relies in your hand.

[nreal]

In fact, many ICO rating websites receive money to conduct reviews. So, I never completely trust a site, I will refer to a variety of sources to choose the best project.

[cpoer2011]

There are Some of ICO reviews you can trust them but some of it you can not trust it. You must be careful to choose the right ICO Reviews as your indicator for you to invest on the right ICO. You have to make your own research sometimes.

[Mpamaegbu]

Trusting ICO review sites in totality is like trusting one's goat to take a stroll with a hoard of lions. There is always a streaming caveat. I speak from experience as one who had also fallen victim to these overrated ICO reviewers. Although, once in a while now I take a peep at the mmncrypto channel to see what reviews they have. Then I wait for the crypto to hit the market before buying.

[seyola89]

Many ICO rating and review websites a d set uses are truly paid. But I ask myself that is it possible for then to do it for free? I don't think so though coz they are also providing a service, so maybe they have to be paid for their work. But the problem comes when they are not genuine with their assessment and ratings and are paid just to chill and inflate the ratings of the project.

[warning_btc]

I am try one time income to the project by ico review.
Its also lottery how any other experts predicting.
In crypto world many depends from moneys. Who have more money they win.

[waterproof]

Now it is very difficult to choose a real project. Even the site, the roadmap, the team, the demo version does not guarantee you that the project will work.

[grifinmch]

review of ICO could not fully objective and judge based on what it is. Sometimes it's just an assessment from the outside only and certainly not very specific. better do his own analysis because this certainly would be more satisfactory, however despite having to also build on knowledge as well. never to believe in this sort of thing because often it is surely trapping.

[Goodnuel]

A lot of times, the ico ratings are not very reliable.. They get high reviews and ratings when they pay them more to do reviews... Icos that were rated highly by ico sites have gone on to be scams or shit projects. Its in your best interest to invest in icos based on your own sound researches and guts.

[basici]

I stopped trusting start-ups in this market because there are so many scams and unfortunately the opportunities for earning have become much lower compared with last year

[zabir.brutov]

It is hard to believe in them, because there are so many stories, that it costs a certain sum of money to get a good rating. But when I look at 10 different websites and all of them are giving the highest marks, I should say, that I believe in such ratings.

[Gastonic]

Of course not. It is a very basic rule that dont trust anyone except yourself. Do your own research about the project, the team, token metrics etc. You know ICO reviews are paid and they can manipulate it to make believe the public that the project is good.

[Sid3d]

If the review on ICO was done by people whom I trust and with whom I have already worked, then I will definitely pay attention to the project that they are reviewing. Otherwise, I’ll rather pass by the ICO unknown to me.

[FirstCryptic]

Investors should only trust their opinion. An investor as an experienced player must build his own tactics and strategy in selecting ICO projects for investment.

[max fray]

I especially liked your idea about "if the project described is so good why won't the reviewer make millions himself?".
All in all, I don't trust ICO reviews and prefer doing my own research.
ICO rating sites can sometimes be helpful if you quickly need some basic info like the availability of bounty campaign, token price, links to project team and such like.

[fulled]

only if profesional analys leave a comment in review, but if the review come from internal site reviewer i regularly avoid that ico or atleast wait till my favourite analys leave a comment there

[kravas86]

I personally don't see the point in trusting them. All work and write reviews for the sake of some achievements. They can be both monetary and spiritual.

[Sponsoredby15]

ICO review cannot be trusted because all of them are bias and many of them are paid to get a good review in their website. I prefer to do your own research if you don't want to lose like what happened to those investors who relied on ICO reviews.