ICO Reviews, trust them or NOT?

[Btc_1856]

make your own research, don't trust them. It used to be trusted but at the moment, when a lot of ICO, they can not rate all of ICO correctly.
Now, investing on ICO is like gambling. Just make your own research to reduce rate of loss. See Denaro and Bitpenta before, they got high mark on ICO review, get a lot of fund then run away.

Yes, it is good to research before concluding on investment because based on other rating it is not good to invest. Many ICO spend some money for ICO reviews, so it is bad idea investing based on the reviews, we have to find and research about the company whether it is potential or not.

[1714492843]

1714492843

[1714492843]

1714492843

[1714492843]

1714492843

[1714492843]

1714492843

[MCDForm44]

I've found very few unbiased ICO reviews.  Most are for some off the books bounty or even for a discounted allocation into the private sale. 

[crypto4hope]

Most ICO reviews are biased or paid or type of some kind of advertisement. It is always good to do your own research before trusting.

[Katashi]

this is to just sum it up, your question to trust them or not is really up to you. i mean just imagine if you are a girl having a lot of suitors, then sadly you have a past with a single men who ruin your trust. Does it mean you will end up being a single lady sitting in an old fashioned rocking chair knitting handkerchief for nephews because you don't trust men anymore. Same thing with selecting ICO's all you need to do is do a background check before investing or participating to advertise them online.

[saycryptohello]

i trust them till today. after i find this thread i think different about it.

i thought these pages would be reliable, but apparently not.

you made the right choice, the more I look at the ratings, the more I understand that now it's rather advertising platforms

[criptoman83]

I like to watch different Video Reviews and read articles, but I can't believe them 100%. We need to do our own research, because the information on the project website or promotional articles will always tell about the strengths of the project. Makes sense to talk about weak? This won't attract investors.

[WhyBit]

I have not too much experience in this but I can say most of Reviews are biased and not near to reality because most of times companies pay some good amount for this they want some good intention of investors so in this case better do your own research and then invest in any project its case of your hard earned money

[shulern]

There are many good and many bad ico's .And here all your attitude to them will consist only in what most of them you will get .I don't particularly trust ICO

[BlockpassIDN]

There are some websites that can be trusted, the trick is to find the right ones. Maybe start by doing some reviews of your own and then seeing which review websites match your opinions - then you can trust those websites.

[ashao1015]

Dont believe anybody or anything. Check everything yourself. Ofcourse it is very difficult and takes
enormous quantity of time, but good ICO can make you really rich and all the work will be rewarded.

[p i e c e]

I watch reviews of many kinds of things. ICO is one of them. But I try don’t pay close attention to the thoughts represented in such videos and articles. My own intuition and experience are decisive in case of making choice.

[kobe24]

I think most ico reviewers are being paid i can see so many projects that collected so much funds but they are rated with low ratings and they have a good team

[Naficopa]

They are certainly helpful. They allow you to pre-evaluate the project. There is never 100% certainty about the reliability of the data contained there. You always have to do your own research on the project, team, innovation etc.

[o48o]

Trust is maybe a wrong word for it since everything is biased, but i am trying to collect the facts and form my own opinions.

[sockpuppet1911]

They are certainly helpful. They allow you to pre-evaluate the project. There is never 100% certainty about the reliability of the data contained there. You always have to do your own research on the project, team, innovation etc.

Yeah, and there are multiple places to collect information from, some of them are paid sure but it helps to check the links yourself

[zero4five]

The well-known fact that most of all reviews on any topic are written by order. Paid reviews are available on any site where there is an opportunity to leave comments. This is Hidden Marketing.
Before investing in the ICO, conduct your own serious analysis in order to make your own decision.

[indobitcoin.tk]

but do not trust completely. use the analysis and discussion of their own in order to understand about whatever he does. Furthermore, if you only rely on the opinions of others only private of course we will not be able to flourish in the crypto. therefore do not be too trusting with the reviews given.

[Arlibtchunt2018]

Well, I think we don't have to give our 100% trust to those reviews. Since those knowledge or idea they share are only their thoughts and own research. They just give information for us to know about that campagin but it is our duty to thoroughly research and find fault if the certain ICO if it has.

[Swati Kapoor]

Hi, Never trust someone else reviews 100%, you should always do your own research to check the facts before you invest money in a project. From my opinion i believe on scidex, it's really great project- fits to market needs perfectly.

[Megashaw]

I think the reviews can still be used as part of the yardstick  or tool to draw your conclusion but you still need to use your own discretion and do not be 100percent reliant on them because some projects still fail despite high ratings.