★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[Rabinovitch]

Why can't I see the digibyte-qt inside digibyte-6.14.2-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz (it's the latest Linux wallet, AFAIK)?

p.s. it's better for Digibyte team to correct the download links at Digibyte.co. I found a proper wallet for linux only here: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases

[Space3003]

The only progress is on the wallet?
https://digibytefoundation.org/development
good to see any dates like the updated wallet in december and hardfork somewhere spring 2018.

[Delphinus]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB! 

[Jumbley]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB! 

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now! 

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

[stellerator]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB! 

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now! 

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

Good news, What about Jaxx support?

[Jumbley]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB! 

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now! 

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

Good news, What about Jaxx support?

Can't find anything about that......but now is a good time to purchase a Nano S from ledger, they are still running their BLACK FRIDAY deal. 

[iikun]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB! 

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now! 

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

This is excellent news. Was holding off to see who would support DGB first...seems it's now time to get a Ledger 

[Telenong]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB!  

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now!  

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

This is excellent news. Was holding off to see who would support DGB first...seems it's now time to get a Ledger  

trezor has updated firmware device for digibyte support, and ledger do same things launching end of 2017
https://twitter.com/Morveus/status/934874642229186561

[iikun]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB!  

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now!  

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

This is excellent news. Was holding off to see who would support DGB first...seems it's now time to get a Ledger  

trezor has updated firmware device for digibyte support, and ledger do same things launching end of 2017
https://twitter.com/Morveus/status/934874642229186561

You mean it is already implemented?  I saw a post on Reddit but can't see anything about it being added on Trezor's own site

[NrX]

After having a look at the roadmap I have increase the portion of coins for long term. There is no reason to use large chunk of my coins for trading. I was replacing some of the coins/tokens to rearrange my long term portfolio. DGB has many things to be reason to bet on it as this will be dark horse in this race.

[Jumbley]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB!  

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now!  

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

This is excellent news. Was holding off to see who would support DGB first...seems it's now time to get a Ledger  

trezor has updated firmware device for digibyte support, and ledger do same things launching end of 2017
https://twitter.com/Morveus/status/934874642229186561

I couldn't find anything about Trezor support for DGB yet, I know DigiByte submitted requirements. 
Anyway I said I would buy ledger if they supported it first. Looks like they have, so I kept my word. 

[DigiByte]

Need a DigiByte logo for your app, website or blockchain project? Check out the new DGB logo repository we just pushed to GitHub with logos, icons and more: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte-logos

https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin/status/935214760026615808

[DigiByte]

Why can't I see the digibyte-qt inside digibyte-6.14.2-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.gz (it's the latest Linux wallet, AFAIK)?

p.s. it's better for Digibyte team to correct the download links at Digibyte.co. I found a proper wallet for linux only here: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/releases

This issue has been corrected. The proper links are now on the website.

[DigiByte]

For those new to this forum and thread, this is no longer the most active or monitored communication channel for DGB.  Most of the community has Migrated to Telegram and the quickest updates can be found on DGB twitter.


https://www.digibyte.io/digibyte-community

https://twitter.com/DigiByteCoin

[waqasniaz007]

What u guys expect the price of dgb next two month with this btc rally. Will it go again to 2600 satoshi? I am longterm holder.

[Jumbley]

What u guys expect the price of dgb next two month with this btc rally. Will it go again to 2600 satoshi? I am longterm holder.

Please let's leave price speculation out of here....before you know it, the pages get filled with guff....every long term holder should know how much the developers and majority of long-term holders hate this!

[IanC]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

[Jumbley]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

I don't think you can. Don't think you can run two wallets on the same machine!

[DigiByte]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

[Jumbley]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

OK, I stand corrected!  

While we are here, can we go into this a little further and spell out where and what changes Ian will need to make please?

I can see how the above conversation could lead to more mining on the DigiByte network.
I know how so many people hate asking questions but can’t wait to hear the answers, so they can try things for themselves without looking foolish.
 

Oh by the way this is an open question, anyone with the answers can butt in and explain with their community spirit. It doesn't have to be Jared who possibly just went to bed at 5am, if he's in HK.