★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[IanC]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

[Jumbley]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

I don't think you can. Don't think you can run two wallets on the same machine!

[DigiByte]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

[Jumbley]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

OK, I stand corrected!  

While we are here, can we go into this a little further and spell out where and what changes Ian will need to make please?

I can see how the above conversation could lead to more mining on the DigiByte network.
I know how so many people hate asking questions but can’t wait to hear the answers, so they can try things for themselves without looking foolish.
 

Oh by the way this is an open question, anyone with the answers can butt in and explain with their community spirit. It doesn't have to be Jared who possibly just went to bed at 5am, if he's in HK. 

[Driendy]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

There are no bs hype news or whatever but there is proper roadmap and yes DGB will rise...https://digibytefoundation.org/

I agree.

Jared always targeted a $1 - $5 per DGB price point long term. I think within 24 months we will be in these ranges.

Jared lives in asia and i suspect that will be the market that rockets DGB when its time has come.

Guys can someone explain +4.25% today's pump What is going on wowow, any updates ? with this pace we reach soon 1$ 

Well but jokes aside 1$ i feel is very optimistic. 10 BLN of market cap is needed and to get there :
1st you need to survive the winter (new regulations coming in , new coins ideas , projects ...) to talk about after 2 years . If by then the project is still active and moves to 1bln = great
2d soon there will be new expectations from the market. Are you going to be listed in investeent packages like BTC does ? Are you in team with a big name ? If not then this will always stay an amateur project and wouldn't move to closer to 1$.

OMG please go away. You come asking about a 4.25% move.

Your after points are as ignorant as your question. You obviously don't understand emerging markets, the crypto ecosystem and your grasp on economics is embarrassing.

Tip: more sitting with hands in lap learning instead of injecting your lack of understanding. 

Haha , regarding my comment about 4.25% as I wrote was a joke if you read . Don't take things so personal close to heart  , I am myself very positive about the crypto ecosystem and DGB especially (in case you review my comments). We can't even say a word anymore , wow... 

[Jumbley]

Telegram is great....If you have a smart phone and it hasn't been hacked!

[DigiByte]

I am trying to setup a mining pool with 2 algorithms. I have 2 data directory, 2 different conf files. When I start the second process the debug.log shows

CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/database ErrorFile=/home/test/.digibytescrypt/db.log
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Selected Algo: scrypt
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to [::]:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Unable to bind to 0.0.0.0:12024 on this computer. DigiByte Core is probably already running.
2017-11-27 19:38:22 Error: Failed to listen on any port. Use -listen=0 if you want this.

Is it possible to run 2 digitbyte processes on the same server so that 2 algo could be mined at the same time?

Ian

This is most definitely possible, you just need to specify separate data directories for each algo. We do 5 on one server for DigiHash. You could be trying to start two separate instances from the same directory.  That's what that error looks like.

Note: You need to make sure each daemon runs on a different port aka deamon 1 on 14030, 2 14033 and so on.

[Driendy]

What u guys expect the price of dgb next two month with this btc rally. Will it go again to 2600 satoshi? I am longterm holder.

I am now expecting the possibility of another March-Mai pump event yet to come. Look at BTC and the reasons as why it's so high. People will start switching to alts as soon as :

-the free cash distributions at BTC drops
-huge BTC corrections start
-need for diversification and exposure to more cryptos grow

Basically around 50 bln taken from BTC in my view may land with alts. After all putting all the eggs in one basket was never very wise. That's where DGB is well positioned to take onboard +/-1 billion but of course we don't know what will happen

[DigiByte]

OK, I stand corrected!  

While we are here, can we go into this a little further and spell out where and what changes Ian will need to make please?

I can see how the above conversation could lead to more mining on the DigiByte network.
I know how so many people hate asking questions but can’t wait to hear the answers, so they can try things for themselves without looking foolish.
 

Oh by the way this is an open question, anyone with the answers can butt in and explain with their community spirit. It doesn't have to be Jared who possibly just went to bed at 5am, if he's in HK.  

Once you have 5 data directories setup you can make a shell script like below:

Code:

digibyted --datadir=/root/data/sha256d/
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/scrypt/
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/qubit/
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/skein/ 
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/groestl/

Note: calling digibyted only works to start wallet. To execute commands run a script like below by calling "digibyte-cli":

Code:

/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/sha256d/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/scrypt/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/qubit/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/skein/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/groestl/ stop

Each instance of digibyted needs to run on a different RPC port. What we do is we run 4 out of the 5 algos with the "prune=550" command to keep from bloating the server. All data comes from one algo and gets relayed to other 4 algos locally.

Example Sha256 config:

Code:

rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=password
port=14012
rpcport=14011
daemon=1
server=1
algo=sha256d
maxconnections=500
prune=550

The prune=550 command purges data beyond 550mb of the most recent blocks and txs. It is not enabled be default.

[Jumbley]

OK, I stand corrected!  

While we are here, can we go into this a little further and spell out where and what changes Ian will need to make please?

I can see how the above conversation could lead to more mining on the DigiByte network.
I know how so many people hate asking questions but can’t wait to hear the answers, so they can try things for themselves without looking foolish.
 

Oh by the way this is an open question, anyone with the answers can butt in and explain with their community spirit. It doesn't have to be Jared who possibly just went to bed at 5am, if he's in HK.  

Once you have 5 data directories setup you can make a shell script like below:

Code:

digibyted --datadir=/root/data/sha256d/
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/scrypt/
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/qubit/
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/skein/ 
sleep 2
digibyted --datadir=/root/data/groestl/

Note: calling digibyted only works to start wallet. To execute commands run a script like below by calling "digibyte-cli":

Code:

/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/sha256d/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/scrypt/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/qubit/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/skein/ stop
sleep 2
/root/digibyte/src/digibyte-cli -datadir=/root/data/groestl/ stop

Each instance of digibyted needs to run on a different RPC port. What we do is we run 4 out of the 5 algos with the "prune=550" command to keep from bloating the server. All data comes from one algo and gets relayed to other 4 algos locally.

Example Sha256 config:

Code:

rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=password
port=14012
rpcport=14011
daemon=1
server=1
algo=sha256d
maxconnections=500
prune=550

The prune=550 command purges data beyond 550mb of the most recent blocks and txs. It is not enabled be default.

Brilliant! Thank you Jared......hard not to love you. 

[Telenong]

Wooooo very happy with the upcoming Ledger support for DGB!  

Ooh...It's true, will have to buy some now!  

https://trello.com/b/5nQ1mdzt/ledger-roadmap

This is excellent news. Was holding off to see who would support DGB first...seems it's now time to get a Ledger  

trezor has updated firmware device for digibyte support, and ledger do same things launching end of 2017
https://twitter.com/Morveus/status/934874642229186561

I couldn't find anything about Trezor support for DGB yet, I know DigiByte submitted requirements. 
Anyway I said I would buy ledger if they supported it first. Looks like they have, so I kept my word. 

https://mobile.twitter.com/TREZOR/status/932902628085952512

It is legit, but this is just about the device firmware. We are looking for an appropriate wallet interface.

More information will come in an official announcement.
4:24 PM · Nov 21, 2017

[coldstorage]

Litecoin is setting itself up as a second layer solution for bitcoin.  A cohort, not a competitor.  Few other scrypt coins that share lots of litecoin DNA could manage to compete in the same space because they're not the strongest coin of their algorithm, i.e., one litecoin pool alone might be able to attack most scrypt altcoins.  But DGB's multi-algorithm approach, along with their faster, cheaper transactions puts them in a position to compete with litecoin without those security concerns. 

DGB seems ideally suited for that technologically speaking, but when I look at the roadmap, I don't see anything that looks like that.  DGB seems like it could compete to be the backbone of crypto payment processing, but instead of having to go out and convince billions of users to choose it over more familiar coins, it just needs to make a financial case to a tiny number of payment processors that running transactions through DGB LNs will be cheaper and faster and their customers will never know DGB was even involved.  DGB could win without having to challenge Bitcoin's network effect, in fact, it can benefit from Bitcoin users. 

Has Jared talked about this approach?  Is there a plan to possibly not just do that for Bitcoin, but perhaps all segwit/LN coins?  I'd love to see info on that if it's being worked on and thought about.

[artmen007]

DGB looks very interesting for investment. From the point of view of the price in 110-120 sat. The possible potential of a big. But pack entry point not see. The graph goes downhill. And while this trend is not broken. Thinking about the growth of spring this year and possible the x's from this project of course you want to invest in it. I will closely follow

[Rijakolus]

WTF IS with this DGB price... insane. I bought at 0.32c when it fell from 0.60c.... GG... the biggest lose for me in crypto

[iikun]

WTF IS with this DGB price... insane. I bought at 0.32c when it fell from 0.60c.... GG... the biggest lose for me in crypto

Your numbers seem a bit weird. I assume you mean you bought at 3.2 cents. DGB price has never been greatly volatile, it stays flat for long periods and then experiences upticks now and then. The last one was certainly quite anomalous though, I'll grant you that. Hold for the long term and you will see returns.

[SpAcEDeViL]

Hy!

you can mine DigiByte now on https://miner-control.de ! with 1% fee!
Payout all 30 min.

CANCELED. RAM usage is too height. (over 22GB needed) (16GB ram is build in the server)

a complete own wallet foreach algo is to many...

[Dge10]

Now is the time to buy, in December is the rocket!!!! 

[redjedievolution]

Hi. Check this link from a top of Tradingview about long term in Digibyte. I also think we're at the real bottom, DGB only can go up from this point. I'll sell at 2500 sat. 

https://www.tradingview.com/chart/DGBBTC/p39ghNGf-DigiByte/

DGB looks very interesting for investment. From the point of view of the price in 110-120 sat. The possible potential of a big. But pack entry point not see. The graph goes downhill. And while this trend is not broken. Thinking about the growth of spring this year and possible the x's from this project of course you want to invest in it. I will closely follow

[Jumbley]

Hy!

you can mine DigiByte now on https://miner-control.de ! with 1% fee!
Payout all 30 min.

CANCELED. RAM usage is too height. (over 22GB needed) (16GB ram is build in the server)

a complete own wallet foreach algo is to many...

I can't help thinking that most people that post here, don't actually bother reading anything in here. SpAcEDeViL, have a look at Jared's post, especially the bit about pruning of 4 of the algo's, it's about 6 posts above your one. 

[ghostwalker.ph]

this is by far the most undervalued coin right now. very active dev team, fast confirmation times, trully applicable for financial adoption, hope to see this coin in new exchanges and asian adoption. this coin has a really great potential. this is now part of my long term hodl list.