evoorhees
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1023
Democracy is the original 51% attack
|
|
September 05, 2011, 06:59:57 AM |
|
Half joking... let's just call Bitcoin a religion! Then, not only will it not be a money and subservient to the arbitrary rules of monies, but it will in fact be tax deductible!
Maybe it's the vodka talking =)
|
|
|
|
Uhlbelk
|
|
September 05, 2011, 07:17:14 AM |
|
Half joking... let's just call Bitcoin a religion! Then, not only will it not be a money and subservient to the arbitrary rules of monies, but it will in fact be tax deductible!
Maybe it's the vodka talking =)
Aye, I'll tip a glass to that notion!
|
Freedom with SciFi Coin
|
|
|
tiberiandusk
|
|
September 05, 2011, 07:39:14 AM |
|
Half joking... let's just call Bitcoin a religion! Then, not only will it not be a money and subservient to the arbitrary rules of monies, but it will in fact be tax deductible!
Maybe it's the vodka talking =)
You can't make bitcoin illegal. That would violate my rights as a Coinstafarian.
|
|
|
|
Gabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
|
|
September 05, 2011, 08:25:39 AM |
|
Half joking... let's just call Bitcoin a religion! Then, not only will it not be a money and subservient to the arbitrary rules of monies, but it will in fact be tax deductible!
Maybe it's the vodka talking =)
You are a genius Guys, if we manage to create a religion that has bitcoin as a sacred thing, then every problem is solved. And creating religions is possible, even sci-fi authors created some of great success!
|
|
|
|
davout
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
|
|
September 05, 2011, 08:45:42 AM |
|
There is lots of interesting info in that PDF ...
|
|
|
|
Gabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
|
|
September 05, 2011, 08:50:35 AM |
|
If we make it an official religion then we start collecting DONATIONS
In Italy you could even ask people to donate 8‰ of their taxes to a religion. After all each year the vatican make more than a billion with that way!
|
|
|
|
julz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:18:08 AM |
|
Half joking... let's just call Bitcoin a religion! Then, not only will it not be a money and subservient to the arbitrary rules of monies, but it will in fact be tax deductible!
Maybe it's the vodka talking =)
You are a genius Guys, if we manage to create a religion that has bitcoin as a sacred thing, then every problem is solved. And creating religions is possible, even sci-fi authors created some of great success! I'm pretty sure considering the requirements for holding Bitcoins include blind faith and constant defending of your opinions, Bitcoin is already a religion, just much less profitable since our only prophet can't speak without a laptop in his lap. You dare imply BW was a prophet!? May all your private keys become public for suggesting such a thing! Satoshi is the one and only bitcoin prophet.
|
@electricwings BM-GtyD5exuDJ2kvEbr41XchkC8x9hPxdFd
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:28:07 AM |
|
Bitcoin is not a money, it's bitcoin. Don't try to interpret it with current laws...
The state will naturally try to interpret it with current laws. If you don't want to irritate the state, stop scratching it. In Japan we will most likely see new laws and new regulations adapted to bitcoin (nothing is set yet, talks are still in progress). Other countries could see the same thing if current laws are deemed "not enough". Anyway if you just read the law, Bitcoin is not a virtual currency. I would say that Bitcoin is not a virtual currency, because it is more like virtual goods. After all, it has all the properties of gold, except it's not physical. So perhaps the law should simply treat it as a commodity.
|
|
|
|
The_Duke
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:40:17 AM |
|
I would say that Bitcoin is not a virtual currency, because it is more like virtual goods.
After all, it has all the properties of gold, except it's not physical. So perhaps the law should simply treat it as a commodity.
So if I send my bitcoins from MtGox to my own wallet.dat (I live in europe) I would have to pay import tax?
|
NOT a member of the so called ''Bitcoin Foundation''. Choose Independence!
Donate to the BitKitty Foundation instead! -> 1Fd4yLneGmxRHnPi6WCMC2hAMzaWvDePF9 <-
|
|
|
ChupacabraHunter
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
Chupacabra = Corrupt Gov't,Lies and Fraud
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:41:17 AM |
|
I am not qualified to judge what outcome would be best for Bitcoin. Perhaps it's best to ask ourselves what outcome would be most desirable for those who oppose it? There are prior examples of informal opinions from the government agencies - here is one: HMRC, the UK government's tax-collecting body, says people do not incur a tax liability when trading in bitcoins as long as they do not turn their profits into regular cash. Once conventional money is involved, however, the income could become taxable, HMRC told New Scientist. source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028155.600-future-of-money-virtual-cash-gets-real.htmlI agree that it may lead everyone on a more clear path if we try and follow the path the opponents may try and take. But to add a little confusion, it is also nice to see them chasing all the new ground breakers running wild All in all this is a great "chase" all around!
|
|
|
|
kripz
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:50:24 AM |
|
When is this going to happen? Got lost in the excitement
|
|
|
|
The_Duke
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:52:03 AM |
|
When is this going to happen? Got lost in the excitement 13th of Sept I think?
|
NOT a member of the so called ''Bitcoin Foundation''. Choose Independence!
Donate to the BitKitty Foundation instead! -> 1Fd4yLneGmxRHnPi6WCMC2hAMzaWvDePF9 <-
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
September 05, 2011, 09:53:08 AM |
|
I would say that Bitcoin is not a virtual currency, because it is more like virtual goods.
After all, it has all the properties of gold, except it's not physical. So perhaps the law should simply treat it as a commodity.
So if I send my bitcoins from MtGox to my own wallet.dat (I live in europe) I would have to pay import tax? Actually, no. And that is the beauty of it. The actual balance is stored by the whole network, not on your physical computer. So by "sending" bitcoins, you don't really change their physical localization. It's just matter of complex mathematical computations. By sending Bitcoins, you give somebody else the rights of ownership to the bitcoins, but they don't move themselves.
|
|
|
|
MagicalTux (OP)
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 608
Merit: 501
-
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:00:56 AM |
|
Actually, no. And that is the beauty of it.
The actual balance is stored by the whole network, not on your physical computer. So by "sending" bitcoins, you don't really change their physical localization. It's just matter of complex mathematical computations.
By sending Bitcoins, you give somebody else the rights of ownership to the bitcoins, but they don't move themselves.
This all depends on the final legal status. Law is known to not care much about technical sense.
|
|
|
|
ShadowOfHarbringer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1006
Bringing Legendary Har® to you since 1952
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:20:17 AM |
|
Actually, no. And that is the beauty of it.
The actual balance is stored by the whole network, not on your physical computer. So by "sending" bitcoins, you don't really change their physical localization. It's just matter of complex mathematical computations.
By sending Bitcoins, you give somebody else the rights of ownership to the bitcoins, but they don't move themselves.
This all depends on the final legal status. Law is known to not care much about technical sense. It's not really "technical", its real. Bitcoins are physically not stored on anybody's computer. The private key giving you access to certain amounts of BTC should be viewed as a digital "certificate of ownership" of bitcoins, not bitcoins themselves - it's completely logical.
|
|
|
|
grondilu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1080
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:36:58 AM |
|
(registering to this thread)
|
|
|
|
davout
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1007
1davout
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:45:50 AM |
|
(registering to this thread)
Wanna show up for the ruling ? I'll be there
|
|
|
|
defxor
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:55:46 AM |
|
This all depends on the final legal status. Law is known to not care much about technical sense.
This is often sadly forgotten by [us] geeks. I've also seen in discussions here a disconnect between those of use who live in "spirit of the law" vs "letter of the law" countries. As a generalization I usually go with Europe as a whole often going with what the intention with a law was rather than evaluating whether a new technology needs new letters to be added to the law or not.
|
|
|
|
The_Duke
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Lead Core BitKitty Developer
|
|
September 05, 2011, 10:56:35 AM |
|
I would say that Bitcoin is not a virtual currency, because it is more like virtual goods.
After all, it has all the properties of gold, except it's not physical. So perhaps the law should simply treat it as a commodity.
So if I send my bitcoins from MtGox to my own wallet.dat (I live in europe) I would have to pay import tax? Actually, no. And that is the beauty of it. The actual balance is stored by the whole network, not on your physical computer. So by "sending" bitcoins, you don't really change their physical localization. It's just matter of complex mathematical computations. By sending Bitcoins, you give somebody else the rights of ownership to the bitcoins, but they don't move themselves. Unless the judge decides that the value is not attached to the code in the blockchain, but to the key that provides the right of ownership.
|
NOT a member of the so called ''Bitcoin Foundation''. Choose Independence!
Donate to the BitKitty Foundation instead! -> 1Fd4yLneGmxRHnPi6WCMC2hAMzaWvDePF9 <-
|
|
|
BitcoinPorn
|
|
September 05, 2011, 11:45:14 AM |
|
Bitcoin is not a money, it's bitcoin. Don't try to interpret it with current laws, we'll most likely need a new set of laws to accommodate the way it works and the anonymity required.
I wish this were to happen. Bitcoin is going to be pegged and labeled in the easiest way for them to understand, which is 'funny money' .. but still money. Thanks for this update Tux, I hope your lawyers are poking at this case from all sides and even jumping in the forums to see what the smarter users might be able to offer regarding this case.
|
|
|
|
|