[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[HammerHedd]

About a 10% increase for me...

Any chance of a windows compiled version?

I removed now the big optimization, too much CPU dependent... Try now and PM me if you want again that 10%, I'll say to you what change on the code...

Ack! I just tried compiling it on other machines, and I get

Code:

xcoin.c:61:2: error: unknown type name ‘hashState_groestl’
  hashState_groestl groestl;
  ^
xcoin.c: In function ‘Xhash’:
xcoin.c:126:1: error: unterminated comment
 /*
 ^
xcoin.c:123:2: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
  memset(hash, 0, 128);
  ^
make[2]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Making install in compat
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing     -O3 -march=native -MT minerd-xcoin.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-xcoin.Tpo -c -o minerd-xcoin.o `test -f 'xcoin.c' || echo './'`xcoin.c
xcoin.c:61:2: error: unknown type name ‘hashState_groestl’
  hashState_groestl groestl;
  ^
xcoin.c: In function ‘Xhash’:
xcoin.c:126:1: error: unterminated comment
 /*
 ^
xcoin.c:123:2: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
  memset(hash, 0, 128);
  ^
make[1]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1

What can I do to bring back the 10%?

[1715385778]

1715385778

[1715385778]

1715385778

[1715385778]

1715385778

[1715385778]

1715385778

[tabnk]

Tried new source.

xcoin.c:61:2: error: unknown type name ‘hashState_groestl’
  hashState_groestl groestl;
  ^
xcoin.c: In function ‘Xhash’:
xcoin.c:126:1: error: unterminated comment
 /*
 ^
xcoin.c:123:2: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
  memset(hash, 0, 128);
  ^

About a 10% increase for me...

Any chance of a windows compiled version?

I removed now the big optimization, too much CPU dependent... Try now and PM me if you want again that 10%, I'll say to you what change on the code...

[tabnk]

0.00217345 BTC at Coins-e NOW !!!! 

[tabnk]

SAME error as YOU   

About a 10% increase for me...

Any chance of a windows compiled version?

I removed now the big optimization, too much CPU dependent... Try now and PM me if you want again that 10%, I'll say to you what change on the code...

Ack! I just tried compiling it on other machines, and I get

Code:

xcoin.c:61:2: error: unknown type name ‘hashState_groestl’
  hashState_groestl groestl;
  ^
xcoin.c: In function ‘Xhash’:
xcoin.c:126:1: error: unterminated comment
 /*
 ^
xcoin.c:123:2: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
  memset(hash, 0, 128);
  ^
make[2]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Making install in compat
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes/compat'
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing     -O3 -march=native -MT minerd-xcoin.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/minerd-xcoin.Tpo -c -o minerd-xcoin.o `test -f 'xcoin.c' || echo './'`xcoin.c
xcoin.c:61:2: error: unknown type name ‘hashState_groestl’
  hashState_groestl groestl;
  ^
xcoin.c: In function ‘Xhash’:
xcoin.c:126:1: error: unterminated comment
 /*
 ^
xcoin.c:123:2: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input
  memset(hash, 0, 128);
  ^
make[1]: *** [minerd-xcoin.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ubuntu/darkcoin-cpuminer-1.3-avx-aes'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1

What can I do to bring back the 10%?

[Lebubar]

Two more. That's it, I'm taking a break.

XwBidPQVnGFEzqfJbTybS9gyXX2yu1JbfM

Love it, just ONE small change and we are going to use it!

Made the outer ring silver. If you can make us that with a transparent background, we are DONE!

And when we get the physical coins made I will send you one.

Agree !! Really nice...

I want one real too ....

[TanteStefana]

Two more. That's it, I'm taking a break.

XwBidPQVnGFEzqfJbTybS9gyXX2yu1JbfM

Love it, just ONE small change and we are going to use it!

Made the outer ring silver. If you can make us that with a transparent background, we are DONE!

And when we get the physical coins made I will send you one.

Agree !! Really nice...

I want one real too ....

Me too!  That'd be so cool!

[InternetApe]

Two more. That's it, I'm taking a break.

XwBidPQVnGFEzqfJbTybS9gyXX2yu1JbfM

Love it, just ONE small change and we are going to use it!

Made the outer ring silver. If you can make us that with a transparent background, we are DONE!

And when we get the physical coins made I will send you one.

Agree !! Really nice...

I want one real too ....

Me too!  That'd be so cool!

For the back of the physical coin we will need a design for that too! Who ever designs it will also get a physical coin free!

Max 7 colors, no gradients!

[HammerHedd]

Two more. That's it, I'm taking a break.

XwBidPQVnGFEzqfJbTybS9gyXX2yu1JbfM

Love it, just ONE small change and we are going to use it!

Made the outer ring silver. If you can make us that with a transparent background, we are DONE!

And when we get the physical coins made I will send you one.

Agree !! Really nice...

I want one real too ....

Me too!  That'd be so cool!

For the back of the physical coin we will need a design for that too! Who ever designs it will also get a physical coin free!

Max 7 colors, no gradients!

Please let us know when / where we will be able to get these physical cons! Any chance the first run would be numbered in any way?

[elmad]

SAME error as YOU  

About a 10% increase for me...

Any chance of a windows compiled version?

I removed now the big optimization, too much CPU dependent... Try now and PM me if you want again that 10%, I'll say to you what change on the code...

Ack! I just tried compiling it on other machines, and I get

Ok, I fixed the remove, now you can compile. Expect 10% as before where to had it.

HammerHedd and  the others, if you have different machines and different behaviours, please send me a pm with a table like this:

Code:

   CPU  ------- v1.3  -------  new v1.3
i7-3770k-------459khs--------511khs
  

[TingCoin]

BITCOIN @ MTGOX is US$ 90 per BTC.

There are few potential alt-coin that can over take BTC.

Hopefully, DRK is one of it !!!!!!!!! 

Nobody uses Gox anymore, you can't withdraw and nobody knows if they're gonna enable it again. BTC is at about $550.

[HammerHedd]

SAME error as YOU  

About a 10% increase for me...

Any chance of a windows compiled version?

I removed now the big optimization, too much CPU dependent... Try now and PM me if you want again that 10%, I'll say to you what change on the code...

Ack! I just tried compiling it on other machines, and I get

Ok, I fixed the remove, now you can compile. Expect 10% as before where to had it.

HammerHedd and  the others, if you have different machines and different behaviours, please send me a pm with a table like this:

Code:

   CPU  ------- v1.3  -------  new v1.3
i7-3770k-------459khs--------511khs
  

Hmmm... still getting the unterminated comment error in xcoin.c  Maybe it takes a while for the repository to register the change?

BTW, elmad, you a re a mad scientist genius!

EDIT: Got it, working correctly now... stand by for some hash numbers...

Code:

   CPU  ------- v1.3  -------  new v1.3
i7-2640k-------50.15khs--------55.68khs
  

Obviously this is a per thread average rather than overall hash rate. More to follow when I get mother machines going... Sorry, laptops got done first

[bigc1984]

Darkcoin the only coin on the top #20 list that is on the rise! ALL OTHER COINS TOOK HITS.
http://coinmarketcap.com/

[tabnk]

Oh, hope it GO up !!! 

BITCOIN @ MTGOX is US$ 90 per BTC.

There are few potential alt-coin that can over take BTC.

Hopefully, DRK is one of it !!!!!!!!! 

Nobody uses Gox anymore, you can't withdraw and nobody knows if they're gonna enable it again. BTC is at about $550.

[tabnk]

DARK @ 18 at Coinmarketcap.

ABOVE VTC . Never expected that  

[Kreativekrypto]

Darkcoin the only coin on the top #20 list that is on the rise! ALL OTHER COINS TOOK HITS.
http://coinmarketcap.com/

I love this coin, but I still cannot figure how it's defying the wrath of btc right now. Oh well makes me happy regardless

[elmad]

As a Physics major I have to jump in here - not all of the energy used is turned into heat, in fact most isn't turned into heat at all. Heat is basically all of the wasted energy needed to run the computer. The rest of the wattage that isn't coming off as heat, the majority of the energy, is being used to do work. Basically flipping a bunch of transistors (switches) many times per second, spin hard drives and fans, etc. Heat is a waste byproduct of doing work in imperfect electrical circuits (ones with resistance, ie not a superconductor) - nothing more!

To the first question, yes it could be that it's a sign of inefficiency - but it could also be a sign that the mining software is not using the full potential of the cards.

You are right for all.

For who asked: transistors have very little resistance. Scientists and engineers study to minimize this, because it's a non-ideal phenomen that wastes energy.

Every year of development transistors in processors are more efficients and they have very very little resistance.

So, what is the reason because of heat? Count how many are the transistor in modern cpus and gpus .

And now, why the gpu is more cooler with this gpu miner? Because lesser transitors are ON. So, GPU is not hashing at full potential.

I looked the OpenCL code of the miner. It works, but it's clear that it's not optimized.

To optimize it, it's not easy. At all. 11 differents SHA-3 algorithms... it's a long long challenge....

[AlexGR]

I GIMPed a few variations using the gold/blue design but altering it either into a monochromatic, or into different color/darkness setting.

http://postimg.org/gallery/akvw7czu/

[blajde]

DARK @ 18 at Coinmarketcap.

ABOVE VTC . Never expected that  

it has been like that back and forth for 4 days now.

[BitcoinSteve]

just bought 110 hope its not too late to make some decent $?

[tungfa]

DARK @ 18 at Coinmarketcap.

ABOVE VTC . Never expected that  

hope we make it past Maxcoin soon … just that name already drives me crazyyyy …..>>>