[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Cryptosis]

Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.

I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.

[1714981360]

1714981360

[1714981360]

1714981360

[1714981360]

1714981360

[1714981360]

1714981360

[semajjames]

Manually adjusting your diff rate

how do you do this ?

[splawik21]

8 blocks to go

[Ignition75]

Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.

I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.

From memory, some of the SGMiner versions needed to be set-up quite differently depending on what drivers you were running.  I remember one set of drivers hating dual threads but you could push it quite hard as a single thread, and visa versa for other versions of ATI Catalyst.

[splawik21]

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/block/0000000000108fe6083292ed545e1fe082d550b7a3ec65e468df5328b3d00c6c

ichaaa!!!
1st 30% block paid OK no issues

[Cryptosis]

Finally got my p2pool node setup and my rigs seem to be hashin faster than when on a pool

Slightly in reality. In p2pool, ping makes a major difference. That is why people really ought to test ping below 50ms for optimal performance. If you setup your own local node, then your ping is the best possible, and your reject rate really decreases, so your "net" hashrate is in fact nicely higher.

Mining someone's p2pool, even on low ping, your registered ping is higher, but so is the reject %, and p2pool dont "subtract" that from your "net" hashrate, so its kind of an illusion. Also, p2pool, you can have waves of higher than expected hash, but also the opposite.

Manually adjusting your diff rate makes a huge difference. So having all this into account, any form of p2pool definitely does perform better than a centralised pool.

I noticed with sgminer 5 and running darkcoin-mod kernel I was getting really high hw errors and I had used the exact miner and config on the pool and had no issues but I downloaded another build and whah-la perfection. My reject rate is also really low too and I'm running my node locally so the latency is extremely low.

I set up a node because I live outside of Atlanta and there's no nodes close to me and when I connect to the closest nodes my rejects were insanely high. I had been meaning to get around to setting it up but finally got around to it last night. The only problems I ran into was some commands had changed from the guide I was reading but other than that it was actually a lot smoother than I anticipated.

From memory, some of the SGMiner versions needed to be set-up quite differently depending on what drivers you were running.  I remember one set of drivers hating dual threads but you could push it quite hard as a single thread, and visa versa for other versions of ATI Catalyst.

Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

[coins101]

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/block/0000000000108fe6083292ed545e1fe082d550b7a3ec65e468df5328b3d00c6c

ichaaa!!!
1st 30% block paid OK no issues

+101

That's cool. Whoever it was, beers are on you 

[coins101]

InstantX:

$ > Euro

> = DRK

Rub{b}le > $

> = DRK

[splawik21]

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/block/0000000000108fe6083292ed545e1fe082d550b7a3ec65e468df5328b3d00c6c

ichaaa!!!
1st 30% block paid OK no issues

+101

That's cool. Whoever it was, beers are on you  

Can't drink now...am working...once I came home I'll toast

[Ignition75]

Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help 

[salmion]

Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help 

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby

[Ignition75]

Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help 

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby

Not having the greatest tour so far 

[salmion]

Actually your spot on. I went and checked and the miner with hardware errors was running 2 threads and the new miner I downloaded was only running on one thread per gpu. That's why I love the thread, its like the darkcoin knowledge repo.

Glad I could be of some help  

Ignition it seems directbet thinks england is going to beat australia at the rugby

Not having the greatest tour so far  

Meh they'll win that one. Well they better I have a princely 1 drk riding on it.

[UdjinM6]

IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction

[jiggytom]

Do you guys think that the difficulty went down because less people are mining because of the masternode payment increase (and thus miner decrease)?

[Laxdude7691]

IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction

I'm not a miner, what does this mean? Not good that they are mining almost 50% of the coins?

[DiCE1904]

IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction

Damn multipools

People need to find a p2pool node with the lowest latency to them and point their miners there:

http://p2pools.org/drk

My two p2pools that run and I have in first and as a backup:

http://drkp2pool-dallas.com:7903/static/
http://drkp2pool-socal.com:7903/static/

[Frozil]

Hello, could someone please tell me if is it normal to have my Zemana Antilogger showing a message telling that darkcoin-qt.exe is trying to take captures from clipboard? thanks

[splawik21]

http://explorer.darkcoin.io/block/0000000000108fe6083292ed545e1fe082d550b7a3ec65e468df5328b3d00c6c

ichaaa!!!
1st 30% block paid OK no issues

+101

That's cool. Whoever it was, beers are on you  

Can't drink now...am working...once I came home I'll toast

bump & done

[Ignition75]

IF YOU ARE MINING ON WAFFLE PLEASE STOP



https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction

Damn multipools

People need to find a p2pool node with the lowest latency to them and point their miners there:

http://p2pools.org/drk

My two p2pools that run and I have in first and as a backup:

http://drkp2pool-dallas.com:7903/static/
http://drkp2pool-socal.com:7903/static/

I've just grabbed an additional 1 Gh/s and pointed it at SuchPool for the next couple of days, BetaRigs doesn't want to play with DarkcoinTalk Pool at the minute.

If the situation gets dire I can grab another 3 Gh/s or so on Saturday...

Stonehedge, shall we dance?