Attention, trade volume on Poloniex is wrong whatever the reason might be. I'm trading on that exchange for years and graphs were always correct but now with ETH there is a major problem with 1-day chart, it is showing much lower daily trade volume than listed on the right, at coins list.
It looks like the 1-day chart stopped updating a day or two ago. It only goes up to the 13th, and now it's the 15th.
If you sum the 6 4-hour volumes for Aug 12th, you get:
>>> 752.67 + 270.43 + 667.30 + 1381.6 + 805.87 + 812.13
4690.0
which agrees with the daily total for Aug 12th.
But if you do the same for Aug 13th, you get:
>>> 628.65 + 313.57 + 550.27 + 1234.3 + 3324.8 + 2140.9
8192.49
but the daily chart only shows 3691.8 BTC. And it shows nothing at all for the 14th or 15th.
Looks to me like it stopped counting somewhere between the 4th and 5th 4-bar period:
>>> 628.65 + 313.57 + 550.27 + 1234.3
2726.79
>>> 628.65 + 313.57 + 550.27 + 1234.3 + 3324.8
6051.59
ie. at between 4pm and 8pm server time on the 13th. That was the busiest 4-hour period so far, and around the time when the site appeared to be DDoS'ed offline.
If I had to guess, I would say that the 1-day chart is wrong, and the 24-hour trade volume is right.
Edit: I just reported this error in the poloniex trollbox. Less than a minute later, it was fixed.
Before:
After:
dooglus:
OldManKidd, the eth 1-day chart is broken. it only goes up to Aug 13th. other coins go up to 15thXoblort: whos datt now, why is everything crypto
africanos23: holy *bleep* sly5am,
tr8kr: dooglus, yeah its bugged ...
dumphard: Wings, what 4 day trend?
Wings: is augur a reverse auction like ETH?
OldManKidd:
dooglus, i see.. it is reportedWings: dumphard, all the info we have right now
tr8kr: OldManKidd, thk !
redsn0w: Wings, I don't know.. here more info :
https://sale.augur.net/Wings: dumphard, hasnt even hit the 4hr MA
Wings: redsn0w, cheers
africanos23: I have been following the recent block size debates through the mailing list. I had hoped the debate would resolve and that a fork proposal would achieve wides
africanos23: If two developers can fork Bitcoin and succeed in redefining what "Bitcoin" is, in the face of widespread technical criticism and through the use of populist ta
OldManKidd: tr8kr, dooglus,
redsn0w: Wings, no problem
africanos23: ctics, then I will have no choice but to declare Bitcoin a failed project.
dumphard: Wings, TA doesn't matter so much .. suppressed buys for years? factor that to your chart..
ValentinJesse: this is the 2nd day they are dumping Ethereum like lunatics
tr8kr: what's the relation between augur and eth ?
africanos23: ctics, then I will have no choice but to declare Bitcoin a failed project.
alexpp:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010239.htmlredsn0w: africanos23, the users can fork it.. it is always needed the users
OldManKidd:
tr8kr, dooglus, should be corrected now