[PoS+PoW] eXocoin [EXO]-gen 2.0- dev. from scratch! Give-Away | Open Beta

[Fonzarelli]

hm strange.. when searching for EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc in the block explorer the 666.667 does not appear. The other address to that transaction is displaying the amount.
That will be investigated - as well as the rounding of 667. But that are just minor bugs. If all nodes survive the next 12 hours then we are happy

It is not a problem with using doubles at all. They have a precision of 15 decimals, we capped it at 12. So the 12th decimal will be a rounded value but not the third one like here. But let us check whats the issue here.
Doubles are an issue in comparisions if they are not properly addressed. But with capping/rounding at 12th decimal there should not be an issue anyway. I, personally, never got in trouble with this processing of data but correct me if I am wrong. We could use unsigned long long anyway for V0.6


Right now after ~7 hours running nodes (some ~10) all are still in sync and fully functional. That's the all-time best message here I guess ;-) No crashes or asyncs yet. Crossing fingers for the next hours...




#edit

I just was messing around with 666.666 EXO  

However, client sent 666.667

So I created EXO out of nowhere  

What's causing this? Is this some floating point bug?
Do you use floating point at all?

I sent about 666.666666666666666666 in the form
Exo-client sent 666.667 so he round to 3 decimals.

I dont know how is that so. But actually 666.667 left the wallet. So no "problem" at all, just rounding issue

Ah ok exokk most possibly capped the counting decimals of transactions within the GUI interface to 3 decimals and rounds it properly. I'll ask him/check it and will increase it

I also had an issue with gnerating a first time address: Client crashed and abter doing the same again it worked.
I got 20000 Beta-Exo, maybe thats the issue... 

[1714283850]

1714283850

[1714283850]

1714283850

[1714283850]

1714283850

[1714283850]

1714283850

[eXo_coin]

please send me some test EXOs. will send them back with simple interest of 100% 

EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

send

[Dotcommie]

So we needed 150 posts to benefit from the email giveaway?  Was that mentioned anywhere because I don't remember seeing it.  Sucks because I've lurked on here for a while now but didn't join until this year.

Here's my address if you change your mind.

EXOSftmg9m1tpKbxw94WeGTMtG2G11parKHYdamk

[chinnuperiya]

please send me some test EXOs. will send them back with simple interest of 100% 

EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

send

paid only 10% interest due to the risk of bankruptcy 

I invested in second stage and got permission from you before applying for e-mail giveaway. But you refused my application.

[timmyd]

Created a thread to discuss Exo coin over at www.nxtforum.org, everyone welcome  

https://nxtforum.org/alternate-cryptocurrencies/exo-coin/new/#new

[eXo_coin]

Repost - Potential Bug

OK...  the transaction I sent from  EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme  to  EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme for 5555.55 EXO appears in my transactions but NOT under the transactions when you put the recipient's address in the Block Explorer.

Confirmed. Checking that already.

please send me some test EXOs. will send them back with simple interest of 100% 

EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

send

paid only 10% interest due to the risk of bankruptcy 

I invested in second stage and got permission from you before applying for e-mail giveaway. But you refused my application.

We have sent out a 2nd mail to you yesterday. Please recheck

[chinnuperiya]

please send me some test EXOs. will send them back with simple interest of 100% 

EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

send

paid only 10% interest due to the risk of bankruptcy 

I invested in second stage and got permission from you before applying for e-mail giveaway. But you refused my application.

We have sent out a 2nd mail to you yesterday. Please recheck

I was checking the PM

Got the mail. Thanks.

[Fonzarelli]

eXo_coin:

I sent 2 times payment >10000 to EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

But it never showed up and didnt leave my wallet. However the systm msg told me it had worked...

Maybe the upper bound is 10k and it rejects?

[eXo_coin]

eXo_coin:

I sent 2 times payment >10000 to EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

But it never showed up and didnt leave my wallet. However the systm msg told me it had worked...

Maybe the upper bound is 10k and it rejects?

Strange. What is your (first) address in the wallet? What is your displayed balance? There is no upper bound limitation rule.

[ATC]

please send me some test EXOs. will send them back with simple interest of 100% 

EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

After I sent 8888.88 EXO to chinnuperiya. I got 1000 EXO interest from him. Thank you!

[Dotcommie]

Are these real coins or will it all reset after beta?

[Fonzarelli]

eXo_coin:

I sent 2 times payment >10000 to EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

But it never showed up and didnt leave my wallet. However the systm msg told me it had worked...

Maybe the upper bound is 10k and it rejects?

Strange. What is your (first) address in the wallet? What is your displayed balance? There is no upper bound limitation rule.

No.   Address   Type
0   EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc   EC 256 NIST P-256

Balance is: 20122.93

I only have one address in the wallet.

[eXo_coin]

eXo_coin:

I sent 2 times payment >10000 to EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

But it never showed up and didnt leave my wallet. However the systm msg told me it had worked...

Maybe the upper bound is 10k and it rejects?

Strange. What is your (first) address in the wallet? What is your displayed balance? There is no upper bound limitation rule.

No.   Address   Type
0   EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc   EC 256 NIST P-256

Balance is: 20122.93

I only have one address in the wallet.

Balance still 20122.93 ?? I have EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc: 10789.7 EXO in my chain
If so you can try to delete the chain folder and restart.... :/

[No_Zuo_No_Die]

the new beta seems ok.one step closer to launch

[Fonzarelli]

eXo_coin:

I sent 2 times payment >10000 to EXOyahgZ5Csz31ctmnK22arfAUUWAaZRs1gxdbhd

But it never showed up and didnt leave my wallet. However the systm msg told me it had worked...

Maybe the upper bound is 10k and it rejects?

Strange. What is your (first) address in the wallet? What is your displayed balance? There is no upper bound limitation rule.

No.   Address   Type
0   EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc   EC 256 NIST P-256

Balance is: 20122.93

I only have one address in the wallet.

Balance still 20122.93 ?? I have EXORGxHC1e1h2Dq6QgNpnhy32gTbh2BC2gFycmgc: 10789.7 EXO in my chain
If so you can try to delete the chain folder and restart.... :/

I deleted chain folder, but still showing 20122.93 after restart. Also I cannot see my transactions in the block explorer.

Connections: 6
Current Block ID: 66

[eXo_coin]

just found a bug that possibly is related to your issues:

If someone initiated more than one transfer within the same block then only one of them will be displayed in the blockexplorer search and - that is more important - the calculation of an addresses' balance will be wrong then as well [=counting in only one tx per block](!).

We target V0.59 with minor improvements and bug fixes to be available shortly in around 24h.




So I guess in your case, Fonzarelli, your local client accepts the transfer since balance is OK, but the net does not accept it since calculation of that addresses' balance is not right. You should be able to send a value <=10789.6 EXO but nothing more.

Sorry for the inconveniences but I am glad to found this bug so fast.

Repost - Potential Bug

OK...  the transaction I sent from  EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme  to  EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme for 5555.55 EXO appears in my transactions but NOT under the transactions when you put the recipient's address in the Block Explorer.

That's the same issue.
Bug fix is easy (simply use continue instead of break in 3 lines) and will surely be available in 0.59
#edit: partially wrong.. only targetAddress has been calculated wrongly - sender's addresses always calculated correctly

regards
eXocoin


#edit: Solved in v0.59 (release tomorrow). Your 5555.55 appears now on both sides andFonzarelli's balance calculated to a sum of 20122.9 EXO - so this was not an issue within the chain itself

[eXo_coin]

#edit: Solved in v0.59 (release tomorrow). Your 5555.55 appears now on both sides andFonzarelli's balance calculated to a sum of 20122.9 EXO - so this was not an issue within the chain itself

Good job...  now let's see how mining goes when we hit Block 100!   

Yeah that can be interesting
I expect that the mining value will be available for mining. But _maybe_ the nodes cannot agree on what each will get. That would lead in nobody gets coins. In our small tests with 2, 3, 4 or 5 miners everything wents perfect but lets see

[eXo_coin]

Are you planning to enable Copy (right-click) for the transaction hashes in the Block Explorer like for eXo addresses in Transactions & Wallet?

Good idea. Going to implement that.


Going to deliver a small update with the bugfix, colored amounts and display of balance sum in blockexplorer->search for EXO address


in ~1 or 2 hours

[eXo_coin]

Are you planning to enable Copy (right-click) for the transaction hashes in the Block Explorer like for eXo addresses in Transactions & Wallet?

Good idea. Going to implement that.


Going to deliver a small update with the bugfix, colored amounts and display of balance sum in blockexplorer->search for EXO address


in ~1 or 2 hours

please replace your coin.exe with: download
it has internally the same number (0.58).

Our nodes have not been updated yet, so correct calculations can only be expected thereafter (~1-2 hours again from now).

[mr smith]

Which is the latest beta client i can download guys. ?