Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 09:19:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 268 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][AUR] Auroracoin - a cryptocurrency for Iceland  (Read 506371 times)
nunya_coin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 21, 2014, 10:08:28 PM
 #501

Confirmation is too slow Undecided
This is why KGW is needed.

I don't see how KGW is related to confirmation time?  They are ~10 minute blocks by design. 

And how do you know that?

It's in main.cpp

Code:
static const int64 nTargetTimespan =  8 * 10 * 60; // AuroraCoin: Retarget every 8 blocks
static const int64 nTargetSpacing = 10 * 60; // AuroraCoin: Blocks every 10 minutes



Thank you, I don't know what "main.cpp" is. I've only read the op post and didn't see anything about block target time.

Yeah, I checked there and on the website.  Don't see a tidy coin spec summary anywhere.  Main.cpp is one of the source code files, you can get it from github if you are curious.
1713518379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713518379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713518379
Reply with quote  #2

1713518379
Report to moderator
1713518379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713518379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713518379
Reply with quote  #2

1713518379
Report to moderator
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713518379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713518379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713518379
Reply with quote  #2

1713518379
Report to moderator
1713518379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713518379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713518379
Reply with quote  #2

1713518379
Report to moderator
1713518379
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713518379

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713518379
Reply with quote  #2

1713518379
Report to moderator
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 04:33:44 AM
 #502

Getting an android wallet out before the airdrop is very important imo. I suggest we hire asap the guy who did it for digibyte and earthcoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=195369

I sent him a PM, hopefully he will respond soon!
Canaanite
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 246
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:08:59 AM
 #503

I use    http://aur.easy-mine.eu/
Although there was one downtime once, its working great and seems very fair pool (150 miners are mining currently)
Bukajos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 9
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:19:01 AM
 #504

I use    http://aur.easy-mine.eu/
Although there was one downtime once, its working great and seems very fair pool (150 miners are mining currently)
Best pool i have ever used! Fast feedback responds! After downtime they upgraded their severs, made backup stratum etc.
Taxidermista
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1147
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:32:13 AM
 #505

Confirmation is too slow Undecided
This is why KGW is needed.

I don't see how KGW is related to confirmation time?  They are ~10 minute blocks by design.  

And how do you know that?

It's in main.cpp

Code:
static const int64 nTargetTimespan =  8 * 10 * 60; // AuroraCoin: Retarget every 8 blocks
static const int64 nTargetSpacing = 10 * 60; // AuroraCoin: Blocks every 10 minutes



Thank you, I don't know what "main.cpp" is. I've only read the op post and didn't see anything about block target time.

Yeah, I checked there and on the website.  Don't see a tidy coin spec summary anywhere.  Main.cpp is one of the source code files, you can get it from github if you are curious.

Yeah, and seems that nobody gives a fuck about it.

Could anybody post a proper spec summary in the first post please??

Canaanite
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 246
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:38:30 AM
 #506

I agree, the Tech specs need to be posted in the first post just like all other coins are doing
Moebius327
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 22, 2014, 10:37:51 AM
 #507

Why is poloniex exchange frozen?

nevermind:
Quote
Poloniex Exchange @Poloniex

Some markets may be frozen momentarily while some new security features are tested.
CryptoAddict
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 12:28:10 PM
 #508

http://aur.scrypthp.com/

0.1 withdrawal fee, wtf? They even say it's a network fee and the pool doesn't take anything. Is this true?

If so how come other pools have 0.01?
nunya_coin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 03:40:30 PM
 #509

http://aur.scrypthp.com/

0.1 withdrawal fee, wtf? They even say it's a network fee and the pool doesn't take anything. Is this true?

If so how come other pools have 0.01?

Looking at the block explorer for a recent block that contains transactions, it seems there is no minimum fee, some transactions have .001 and others have 0.  They should really drop what they are charging, given the low rate coins are mined at .1 is nuts.

http://blockexplorer.auroracoin.eu/block/a7cd94cd12f7db6ad7b34d5895fe85aa7f5a32c2e43e2a2155644920abdd7af3
albertdros
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:15:01 PM
 #510

It would not surprise me if this coin would pass litecoin at some point. This coin has been on big media channels and it's getting harder and harder to mine.
nunya_coin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 09:36:05 PM
 #511

It would not surprise me if this coin would pass litecoin at some point. This coin has been on big media channels and it's getting harder and harder to mine.

If OP can make the airdrop work it'll be huge.  Bringing in a bunch of people who haven't touched crypto before is one of the biggest reason DOGE has been a success, and the airdrop could do the same thing.  I think there's a lot of value to being someones first coin.
craaaa
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
February 22, 2014, 09:42:41 PM
 #512

It would not surprise me if this coin would pass litecoin at some point. This coin has been on big media channels and it's getting harder and harder to mine.

If OP can make the airdrop work it'll be huge.  Bringing in a bunch of people who haven't touched crypto before is one of the biggest reason DOGE has been a success, and the airdrop could do the same thing.  I think there's a lot of value to being someones first coin.
its rocket !))

Mining pool: ||| https://easy-mine.eu ||| Stratum: EU|US|
albertdros
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 10:00:11 PM
 #513

It would not surprise me if this coin would pass litecoin at some point. This coin has been on big media channels and it's getting harder and harder to mine.

If OP can make the airdrop work it'll be huge.  Bringing in a bunch of people who haven't touched crypto before is one of the biggest reason DOGE has been a success, and the airdrop could do the same thing.  I think there's a lot of value to being someones first coin.

Even if he could make it work partially it would already be fine. The media hype this coin already creates (and will create more and more once closer to airdrop) will boost this coin for sure.
Bimmerhead
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1291
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 22, 2014, 11:32:46 PM
 #514

Somebody working on an Android wallet here, which is good to see: http://forum.auroracoin.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=31

Hopefully some other developers (or donors) can pitch in.
theomoplatapus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 22, 2014, 11:40:26 PM
 #515

Does anyone else think the block target time should be lowered before the airdrop?

#Bitcoin
balduro (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 03:53:11 AM
 #516

I am preparing a hard fork with KGW implemented. Also, I will tweak the block reward, block time and halving time in order to make the confirmation time faster, without altering how fast coins are generated.
MyFarm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 04:00:40 AM
 #517

YES!
tinus42
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501



View Profile
February 23, 2014, 04:03:53 AM
 #518

What are you going to do about old folks who are not on the internet? Will you send them paper wallets so they can spend them at shops?
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 07:55:15 AM
 #519

I am preparing a hard fork with KGW implemented. Also, I will tweak the block reward, block time and halving time in order to make the confirmation time faster, without altering how fast coins are generated.

I think I read somewhere that implementing KGW in Android wallet would be difficult - no idea why, maybe it requires some libraries that simply are not available? I don't know how KGW is implemented, but I hope you have that aspect in mind as well.
Nite69
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 477
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 23, 2014, 09:17:18 AM
Last edit: February 23, 2014, 09:59:01 AM by Nite69
 #520

I am preparing a hard fork with KGW implemented. Also, I will tweak the block reward, block time and halving time in order to make the confirmation time faster, without altering how fast coins are generated.

I think I read somewhere that implementing KGW in Android wallet would be difficult - no idea why, maybe it requires some libraries that simply are not available? I don't know how KGW is implemented, but I hope you have that aspect in mind as well.

Sure it complicates things.. but nothing is impossibe :-) Have not yet looked at it, but I guess the same; most likely it is just missing libararies.
However, it makes things a lot easier, if the implementation in auroracoin-qt wallet is documented decently :-)


Edit: Hmm. shouldn't be too hard to implement in java, but testing might be the real problem ..

https://github.com/megacoin/megacoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1276

Just call GetNextWorkRequired or KimotoGraivtywell according to block.

Sync: ShiSKnx4W6zrp69YEFQyWk5TkpnfKLA8wx
Bitcoin: 17gNvfoD2FDqTfESUxNEmTukGbGVAiJhXp
Litecoin: LhbDew4s9wbV8xeNkrdFcLK5u78APSGLrR
AuroraCoin: AXVoGgYtSVkPv96JLL7CiwcyVvPxXHXRK9
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 ... 268 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!