Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[8count]

I think they have to take some blame. They should be doing a KYC on the clients they're representing, as well getting us the bounty hunters to represent. They should have a picture with their ID and date so they at least they know who they're. This could lead to future arrest from these scammers. That's my thoughts on the matter anyway.

[1714208686]

1714208686

[1714208686]

1714208686

[warning_btc]

Its very hard to blame bounty managers. especially if manager part of the scam team.
Only one what we can require from him its count stakes on time

[Odebowa]

Not really, but some Are very strict to the bounty hunters, which have side effect on the bounty hunters that they will feel frustrated about the project, this may also have adverse effect on the prospective investor at the latter end

[yuukireit]

Well i think bounty manger can't be blamed for something like that. Sometimes is really hard for manager to checking about the trurth of the ico itself. They are human too who will doing mistake. But if not once that was a bad bounty manager after all

[raes]

if the scam project we can not blame the bounty menager, it is all the responsibility of tem dev who manage the project development. while the bounty manager is only on bounty issues only, such as the calculation of stake and all associated with the rules bounty.

[wateball]

The bounty manager is only a part-time worker on the project side. He can't know if there is a scam on the project side, so we should not blame him, but the bounty manager should keep in mind that the scam should fully study the existence of the project before releasing the bounty plan. scam

[Muzika]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

in the first place if the manager knew that the ICO is scam and he let it run then he should be blame, but if he didnt knew it then people should stop blaming the manager because his work is to publish the campaign and count stakes only,but since he has the direct contact from the team he should be know that and if he found out that the ICO is scam then he should notify the participants regarding the status of the project.

[psychie]

It is hard to determine if the project is scam. So I think the bounty managers would not be blamed. Aside from the bounty hunters the bounty manager also get scam by the project. He is only responsible in bounty field.

[Miles123]

I think they can be blamed if he should not do here task as a manager, he will gather all the information about the bounty and it will not be scammed. He should be the one to lead the voice for the many participants.

[whirlcoin]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

You can't blame a bounty manager if a bounty team becomes scammer he also like us getting paid in tokens for those works so don't depend too much on the managers it is your responsibility to pick the right project before registering up.

[befine77]

I do not think that bounty managers are guilty of anything.  This is their job and they need to check the project before starting work with it.  Often bounty managers become deceived, as well as bounty hunters.

[hoavantathan]

Some ICOs are not real. We can not check because it's to far. But we can analyse to make sure what we do. Stay calm and wisdom!

[olliepearl]

For me, It is hard to determine if the project is scam. So the bounty managers would not be blamed because sometimes bounty manager gets scammed by the project. The bounty managers are only focus in bounty field. It is all responsibility of team dev who manage the project development.

[Dinsdendo]

I believe that managers are not to blame, because they do the same work for which they are responsible, and do not know what is happening with the project.

[rysheeer]

It really wasn't easy to predict the outcome especially on the ICO Uchit because they were so transparent that it blinded most of the investors and bounty hunters. Maybe most of us hunters are just looking on the outside we're not doing more research on what's really happening inside the project.

[Stromspirit]

Because investors can be tricked into believing in projects, broadcasters and prize managers can also, But bounty managers should not take full responsibility because they only issue prizes from ICOs who want to publish their coins. should be responsible for sharing the suspicious advances they know to prevent investor losses as soon as possible. It will adversely affect the development of bitcoin itself the more get the disappointment then the investors will go forever.

[sarfield]

In this forum, we have studied every project, and according to feeling and confidence then we join the project and register then bounty manager always update, and without us know the project is the scam, so this is our risk and manager also can not give any information about it is because it is equally deceived.

[capoklhok]

if I think they are a group of people who launched a project in an ICO company, but we can not blame them for what happened, because bonus managers will not know if ICO cheats or not. Participants in the prize campaign themselves should carefully choose the right potential project to participate, But the bonus manager is also responsible for contacting ICO for the appropriate resolution.

[bitcoinman93]

It really wasn't easy to predict the outcome especially on the ICO Uchit because they were so transparent that it blinded most of the investors and bounty hunters. Maybe most of us hunters are just looking on the outside we're not doing more research on what's really happening inside the project.

you can't really know what's happening inside the project unless you're somehow involved. All you can check is the team and the idea, hoping that the execution will work out just as expected

[magpie_lover]

Yeah, part of the blame goes to the bounty manager because you're signing up trusting his/her reputation to act fairly and distribute the tokens accordingly after the campaigns conclude. These situations vary on a case by case basis. Sometimes, the bounty manager himself/herself gets deceived. In that event, one shouldn't blame him/her when that happens, especially when there is an honest admission given that he/she was deceived. But when the BM is part of the deceit, then he/she should be called out.