Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[BigBoy89]

Bounty managers can't be blamed if the project they handled is a scam. They're just a victim like us bounty hunters because they're just being paid to handle the project.

I think bounty mananger need to carry the blame also, some of them are just desparate to run a campaign before without doing a due dilligence on the project, if you want to sell a project to others one need to make sure is a real deal. Some have not real contact or video chat with any of the developers of the ICOs they are managing

You are absolutely right. Bounty managers should be hold responsible, because they can mislead the bounty hunters very easily. IMO, bounty managers should check the projects they are running as much as they can and make sure the projects are legit.

[Zct2002]

I think bounty managers are not to be fully blamed because some of them don't have eye contact with the management of a project, the bounty work is just a contract for them which they accept in good faith, on the other hand, they should be blamed because they have the right to know everything about the project before embarking on the contract of the bounty manager.
Therefore, they are to be blamed partially.

They should be blamed because in the first place they are here in crypto and they know what projects are feasible, BM should decide that at the start.

Therefore, they are to be blamed partially.

Fully or partially blamed but still it is a blame.

[madhukk]

 It is very hard to predict if the ICO projects will soon to become scam, and it is not bounty managers fault. bounty managers are just following all the task that the team want it to be, then announce what projects is in the future, meaning the scam all happens on the team of the projects and bounty managers are not involve, but in a rarely situation, bounty manager is from the team of the project, so obviously he/she involve on it. but not all.

[prdn]

The project manager is a human and it is really hard to understand if a project is scam. For this, it needs to be quite experienced.

[esjsr]

For dishonest reward managers. They deserve to be punished. BBS should set the table to show them publicly. Make them realize that cheating is not supposed to be done.

[hyriyum]

This is an intense inquiry which the appropriate response could be yes and in the meantime could be no. Right off the bat, the abundance battle director couldn't be a piece of the group at all from the begin yet only an agreement representative with them, which doesn't require meeting face to face (physically). The Team would give the abundance chief the venture data and on the off chance that he/she supposes the undertaking is alright, he would consent to deal with the abundance battle for them. For this situation, the abundance chief shouldn't be faulted yet in the event that else, he/she ought to be considered in charge of that. #justmyopinion

[surtiml]

So ones again we have been misled by another ICO known as Uchit. Presently individuals have begun drizzling abuse and reviles on the abundance supervisor that he has driven them to be defrauded. Regardless of the various expressions of remorse from the director, abundance seekers don't appear to get it. Presently my inquiry is, do you figure abundance seekers must be faulted when we are misled in light of the fact that they knew what the ICO was doing, even from the earliest starting point?

[sashaluna33]

They should take more responsibility, some of the popular ones take on blatant scams.

[CryptoVal13]

In ideal world, the project has to have a good support from the team and managers must always stay updated and check security. If you easily find scammers in the spreadsheets and there is no reply, how can you rely on such project, especially if you invest?

[pshannon21658]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed.

[GulpoRu]

We can't point the finger at Bounty Managers in spite of the fact that they have their weaknesses of not painstakingly picking a decent abundance crusade. They are much the same as us who accept the position of dealing with the organizations abundance crusade. I mean they didn't intentionally distribute a trick ICO even them they don't know whether the organization will trick us. The one to fault here is the group who runs their ICO. We (abundance seekers) and abundance chiefs are for the most part only casualties here.

[samekto198]

the problem is the project team, if the bounty manager is not worth blaming. But the manager should be one step ahead of the bounty participants on the suspicious start project so that project errors can be notified to bounty participants and investors earlier.

[rapidgoog]

I think it's not the bounty Manager's fault that the project turned out to be a Scam.

[Awrirem]

There are such a significant number of issues that may happen in an abundance crusade time of an ICO, one of those regular issue is the issue about the circulation of prizes to the abundance members. Most abundance seekers are frantically grumbling about their prizes since it isn't conveyed to them or postponement in the date of disseminations. At the point when this happens, not everytime the abundance supervisors is the one to be faulted on the grounds that like us they are additionally abundance seekers that are wanting to acquire cash by partaking on bounties. The one to be faulted is the engineer of the ICO.

[lumedeee02]

Bounty managers are not to be blame if an ico turns out to be a scam because them self may not know the project is a scam they are also working to earn money 

[goshay97]

Well I think the bounty manager over time needs to deliver viable and paying projects or he is not worth much good to the bounty hunters.  So I'm not sure he can be blamed outright however he will be a short lived manager if he doesn't pick his game up.  I think the people will always blame the manager at least that's what I have seen thus far.

[FreakSau]

They are the managers, so they have the responsibility to their project.

[kicauklaten]

Maybe for those who don't know the plot then it will certainly blame the manager running. but in reality, the manager also works looking for revenue to run the bounty. either a scam and not sure there will be no one knows. even the manager who has the big names alone sometimes also gets the bounty this scam and reasonable. blame indeed is okay but still positive thinking to find bounty as well.

[cryptoloverlife]

bounty managers are part of the ico promotion it is the particular ico and the fund they try to collect or raise and they share the funds for bounties so everything here works in one to one at the end of bounty tokens sharing

[raes]

some people who do not know in detail will surely blame that the scam bounty project is one of the bounty managers. or when sales do not reach the target is a bounty manager error. it does not actually happen, we must be aware that bounty manager is only obliged to campaign bounty course, sales problem or scam it is dev affairs.