Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[Dikarama7]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

I don't blame the bounty manager because they can't find out the ICO is fraud. I think the decision to choose a project is in our hands, and before deciding to join we must study the project.

[1715113932]

1715113932

[santino11]

Managers are not the one to blame if the bounty is failed.
Bounty becomes a failure if the ICO failed. everything depends on the ICO sales.
BM are hired to do marketing and advertisement, they are just the leader for those bounty participants.
They are paid to work for the ICO and they are not part of the ICO team.

[Alex_He]

Truly speaking the responsibility of the bounty mangers were just to maintain the campaign in a perfect manner getting paid as that we get paid by the end of the ICO. Very few will be provided with initial payment. With ico's we cannot judge when the success, at times the bounty managers were the one who gets blamed. There are managers who fight hard and get the fund and distributes. If one is not at all showing any interest to support the participants then there arises a doubt that he too might be a part of the scam.

[Joep01]

Well we cant say that bounty manager should'nt be blame, of course we can blame him because he take the scam project. There will be a confirmation before you accept that responsibility. As bounty manager you must be aware also to that project you been have manage.

[@baoli]

Sometimes they are offered juicy package they can't reject . people losing money most time is not the bounty manager fault. And truly if a project begins ICO and did not meet soft cap its also not anyone's fault.

[satosibtc1000]

If the Manager leads a lot of projects and has a name and authority he will never cheat his audience and he is not guilty about the project does not pay tokens but if the Manager goes from the project and people are not paid for it another conversation.

[Nwankwobtt]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

Icos exit scams are in no way associated to bounty managers except in cases where the project directly manages its bounty. That aside, bounty managers are contractors and are not part of the project team and shouldn't be held responsible

[Emmy92]

Bounty managers are human not gods that can predict tomorrow or figure out a scam ICO from miles away. In my own understanding, they shouldn't be blamed, they too spent thier time managing the bounty .  

[ngocdhbk2]

It is hard to blame the Bounty managers because it depends on many factors. A team of unsuccessful campaigners alongside the translators who are responsible for receiving the campaign and unforeseen it will affect the reputation of the Bounty team.

[bolshojkush]

Bounty managers are human not gods that can predict tomorrow or figure out a scam ICO from miles away. In my own understanding, they shouldn't be blamed, they too spent thier time managing the bounty .  

There are honest bounty managers, and there are those who lead the Scam, over time you will understand who is who.

[Quarantine34]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

If the bounty managers know that the ICO is scam they will not promoted it, so i think if the ICO is scam we cannot blame the bounty managers because they do their work also to promote the ICO and to get a reward. So let us understand the situation if the ICO is scam. For us, bounty hunters let us be wise on choosing ICO so that we will not blame the bounty managers.

[Jancuki]

I don't think it's entirely the prize manager's fault. Because the prize manager only helps to promote new projects. Perhaps the fault of the gift manager is that he is less careful in choosing a project between the real and the project that only aims to deceive investors.

[Zeke_23]

Well we cant say that bounty manager should'nt be blame, of course we can blame him because he take the scam project. There will be a confirmation before you accept that responsibility. As bounty manager you must be aware also to that project you been have manage.

first things first, even a bounty manager cannot determine if a project is scam. these days, even good project become scam because they only want to make money. but its not the bounty managers fault.

[oemar bakrie]

for me personally if the manager's bounty is with the project itself we should naturally complain if there is an error in the completion of the bounty.
because it's our right to get, but now we don't know from the beginning it's good or vice versa.!!
and if the manager bounty is only given the opportunity to promote the project so that many people can join, we cannot blame the manager if there is a right reason,because the manager's position is the same as us as bounty Hunter..

[awal-akhir]

in my opinion, the manager of the Bounty is also responsible for the mistakes of the ICO fraud that are being managed, because the task of a bounty manager is to see how well the serious fan of the project he holds,

[adekogbe]

Bounty managers are mostly a part of the core team and it is only in recent times that projects have begun to outsource their bounty or community managements. Even with that for any individual or group to take up the responsibility of representing a cryptocurrency project, it is required that they have already made intensive research so as to not be involved in scam practices.
A portion of the blame belongs to the bounty manager


Join DeStream ICO: https://destream.io/?referralId=adf52557d7994818a3bf8131262f2179#action=bountyreg

[Bay_Harbour_Butcher]

there are so many bad bounty managers, they only prioritize their payments, and don't see if the ico project is trustworthy or not, so that's why I always follow a bounty manager that I think is good and can be trusted

[mr3dds]

There are too many scams. I think the scammers are the ones to be blamed. Bounty hunters and managers are just trying to make a living and they got scammed together. Some regulations and rules must be set for ICOs and bounties.

[Taniya1901]

If the project is not paid for participating in the bounty company, I never blame the bounty managers... They're not my fault.. They as well as we performed the work and did not know kakv there will be a final.

[adejoke444]

Bounty managers are not to be blamed alone you should also blame some bounty hunters. You need to make a research about the ICO before you even do their bounty let alone investing.