Are bounty managers to be blamed?

[frchowe214]

An experienced bounty manager will be able to identify scam ICOs, but they are unable to determine if one will succeed or not. If it turns out to be a scam then they are also wasting their time as well, counting stakes will lead to nothing if they don't pay the bounty manager

[1715495100]

1715495100

[Nanagyasi]

We can't blame them entirely but we cannot also let them off the hook just like that because they presented the bounty to us and they ought to have verified with the team to ensure the legidity of the project.

[MadSmiles]

We can't blame them entirely but we cannot also let them off the hook just like that because they presented the bounty to us and they ought to have verified with the team to ensure the legidity of the project.

Don't blame the campaign managers because they don't have anything to do with the distribution after the sheet is turned in.The coins that is transferred from that point on is from the coins team.

[truetempo]

I think that bounty manager should not be blamed. Because they doesn't know if the project SCAM or not. Even good bounty manager too, can make mistakes

[Michail.]

The accusations are of little use, you will not get any money anyway, but it's high time to introduce responsibility for fraud and punish severely for deceiving thousands of people!

[m0Ray]

Often people think their fault is present. After all, if the project turned out to be fraudulent, it means that the managers did not fully understand the project and gave us a bad option.

[TropicalDog17]

they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers

We will never know the whole truth, and whose initiative it was to break the trust of the bounty hunters or change the rules midgame. I wouldn't search for the one to shift blame on, I would try affecting the market leaders so that they invent the mechanism for regulating the ICOs and punishing the scammers.

[karambol13]

Again problems are scanned and we feel that bounty manager once again seems to be blamed for the same. However thousands of apologises are coming from their side but still again investors and new comers are not in a mood to let them go.

[hovrah]

Again problems are scanned and we feel that bounty manager once again seems to be blamed for the same. However thousands of apologises are coming from their side but still again investors and new comers are not in a mood to let them go.

It's a shame when the relationship of the company's Bounty member and the Bounty's manager to the company has double standards. When the manager apologizes, then everyone should accept an apology, But if the participant makes a mistake, then no one forgives these mistakes.

[Azna Azhar]

we shouldnt blame these bounty managers because they are only in charge on the flow and the partcipants in rach ICO.Failing of ICO doesnt reflect the bounty managers but the failed of each participants to meet the requirements for each ICO should also considered.At the end of the day,bounty participants are the one who makes every ICO successful.

Yes, you are right. Bounty participants do not have to blame the bounty manager if the project fails. However, the bounty manager was supposed to give an announcement against the cancellation of the failed bounty project, because currently many bounty programs were not clear.

[Mikell556]

Again problems are scanned and we feel that bounty manager once again seems to be blamed for the same. However thousands of apologises are coming from their side but still again investors and new comers are not in a mood to let them go.

It all depends on how much the bounty manager carefully chooses the bounty campaigns that lead. Someone in a month does not have one campaign and they all turn out to be a scam. A good manager does not take a lot of campaigns, but all his campaigns bring money.

[lovemsngr]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

I think the blame should be either lying on both parties or on no parties. There is no scammed people without a scammer, so the manager is to blame. But there hadn't been a scammer if we wouldn’t have been so gullible and let him do it.

[Barinerro]

From the part of course to blame , but I think that it is strongly wrong to shift the blame because it does not depend on the Manager to raise funds during the ico

[BabatundeM]

So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?

No bounty manager who has a name to protect will go ahead to manage a bounty that he or she know from the outset that it will turn out to be a scam. Most of these bounty managers are kept in the dark just as we bounty hunters. But all the same, they should have done their research about any project before accepting the contract of bounty management.

[diamondroyal]

Most bounty managers are thief,  lazy and nonchalant.

[twitchtver]

they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers

We will never know the whole truth, and whose initiative it was to break the trust of the bounty hunters or change the rules midgame. I wouldn't search for the one to shift blame on, I would try affecting the market leaders so that they invent the mechanism for regulating the ICOs and punishing the scammers.

Yeah, bounty managers could get involved closely to the pool allocated to be distributed without us even knowing, and I bet there are other things that are hidden from the bounty hunters too.

[mine2slow]

Of course they should not be blamed. If you put yourself in their shoes their job is really tough. We shouldnt blame the because scammed projects are unpredictable. Each and everyone must do a research before joining bounties to avoid this incident.

People always need the guilty party. That's how the world works. Cryptoworld included. Bad managers who change the rules on purpose are to blame, they give crypto a bad name and ruin trust in otherwise great projects.

[gezhid008]

If a bounty manager does his job, he should not be blamed.

If most of them had raised the relevant issues and conducted the necessary research before accepting to work for certain ICO's, the bounty hunters would not have suffered much damage.

[Wend]

Actually it's not the fault of the bounty manager if the project he/she handled are not going to success of not pay us on what we participated of it. The bounty manager was the one to manage the campaign and not for distributing the bounty rewards i think.

[alberdina]

Choose an experienced reward manager certainly better. Then later you regret not choosing the Manager properly. Analysis of project campaign gifts are very important. Until now many people are stuck in campaign gifts scam.