Bounties required KYC.

[hotforblockchain]

Projects could care less about multiple bounty entries, KYC is done only because they are obligated by the law or they just afraid of potential problems in case of not doing kyc.

[jebul2]

The Kyc program is great for reducing the number of account users who have participated in prizes, but in my opinion whether the identity of the hunter is not misused by irresponsible people, which I worry about is like that.

[Zooplus]

The Kyc program is great for reducing the number of account users who have participated in prizes, but in my opinion whether the identity of the hunter is not misused by irresponsible people, which I worry about is like that.

This people if they really want to abuse the bounty can use fake names and fake documents.
For a project, their concern should only be the advertising and they should not get the personal information of those who help them, we are in crypto
and we value anonymity.

[elitemobb]

I support the kyc procedure because with its help the conditions for all participants in the bounty are equalized, that is, many people are now using multi-accounts trying to slay more tokens, it is for this that I support this procedure

[zurc]

Do you agree that Bounty needs KYC?

In my opinion only, I will agree with this policy to avoid multiple accounts or the use of other accounts in bounties. If it has this policy it will be fair to investors and to bounty participants. Scams can be reduced to a bounty. Dumpers can also be reduced.

What is your Opinion?
Free comment.

It depends on the company and location to do KYC for bounty because there are locations that requires KYC for their paper works or the team wants to avoid illegal activities.

[Robertqueen2]

"KYC" has become a necessity in order that both companies and investors can protect themselves from fraud. This procedure has become an ordinary one through which the company can ensure that all the participants are abided by regulations.

[Leonard2016]

No I'm not agree with KYC , I would rather to keep my personal information safe , I never know who are they and where are going to use my KYC , I think KYC needs to be replaced with Skype interview or some other ways.

[regtrade]

No I'm not agree with KYC , I would rather to keep my personal information safe , I never know who are they and where are going to use my KYC , I think KYC needs to be replaced with Skype interview or some other ways.

Skype Interviews also not safe, since its not encrypted in any way. Also, maybe you are being recorded and im sure they will ask to see your ID or Passport in camera.

[brokens]

No I'm not agree with KYC , I would rather to keep my personal information safe , I never know who are they and where are going to use my KYC , I think KYC needs to be replaced with Skype interview or some other ways.

Skype Interviews also not safe, since its not encrypted in any way. Also, maybe you are being recorded and im sure they will ask to see your ID or Passport in camera.

no. no, KYC or Skype the same is absolutely not safe for bounty participants because it's better to always protect your identity and I don't think they need to know who or what your face is. KYC is only needed for investors, not for bounty participants because investors are more important than prize participants. yes I also disagree with KYC for bounties.

[cornl]

I know that cryptocurrencies are about privacy. But in current times, taking into account multiple attempts to influence bounty results for one’s profit (multi accounts, bots flooding, cross-liking your other accounts and so on) KYC is the way to keep all the things in the right place. Just think about bounty as a job. If you want to get paid, you have to reveal yourself.

[marketone]

Now, most of the companies are asking for KYC in order to get the bounty because companies want to keep track of coins allocated to the bounty and mostly in some campaign people are joining in bounty with multiple accounts.