Bounty Hunters the cause of token dumping ?

[Emilyp]

I disagree, they are those who participate in the private sale that dump their tokens once they receive them. Bounty hunters in the other hand have to wait for weeks to months after ICO to receive their token and by then the price would already have fallen down.

[FalconB]

Why do you care so much? It's on the contrary advantageous if you like the project, you can buy tokens at a very low price and wait. If the project is good, then its price will still rise despite a dump

[zemuks]

I think it stereotypes which appear in every field.  The main problem of token dump after ICOs is bed market condition now and to high bonus on preICO and price.

[Altec251184]

   These are the standard two ways, who wants to keep their tokens for a long time, and who wants to merge them immediately without waiting for the development of the project, so here it is everyone's business.

[bitgolden]

some dump occurrences happen sometimes before bounty hunter gets token. and if we think, the allocation for bounty hunter is very low, almost all ICO allocates to bounty below 5%. I think it's not fair if bounty hunter is accused of being a price-dump maker.

Bounty hunters are never the cause of dumps and it is actually funny when I get to see a lot of people saying this.
About very tiny percentage of total tokens issued are dished out to bounty hunters which in most cases the tokens or coin would have been trading already before bounty participants get their share as you said, this is just some whale dump since they always end up getting huge bonuses anyway at the start of the ICO, so pushing the blame on hunters is actually uncalled for.

[KayceeMae]

Dont think 2% of total token selled on ico can get a real impact on token price , perhaps for some days after paying bounty hunters , dumpers can affect price ,  but no more

[Pasnik]

Dont think 2% of total token selled on ico can get a real impact on token price , perhaps for some days after paying bounty hunters , dumpers can affect price ,  but no more

Bounty hunters is not the only cause for token dumping there are a lot of factors affecting price dumped. Alhough some bounty hunters they are early sellers of the token just to get the profit. Also, investors are contributing for this situation of dumping of price.

[PetroRoshenko]

Those percentages that give bounties hunters have nothing to do with it. So it is not correct to say and now it is especially relevant because it can be compared with projects that go without a bounty and also fall in price.

[Maldini07]

wrong opinion ,, the amount of coins allocated for bounty reward is only a small portion so it is unlikely to have an effect on the rise of his coin. if there is any dump effect after the reward distributed its only a temporary time, I think the most important thing is how the developer team actions after the ico project finish, and in any market they are registered

[metallikingz]

I dont think kthat this is the main reason, because there are a lot of other problems that are making the investors dump their tokens (lost of trust, lack of news) and a lot of other more stuffs that might be important to some investors

[ballerin and giroud]

If there's no bounty hunter I'm sure project token will not run properly, even the project will not have investors. Bounty hunter has a vital function for promotion so that every investor is interested. And now, you blame bounty hunter is the cause of the token price decreased? it does not make any sense. You should be an ICO developer to know the importance of bounty hunter, compared to people like you.

[thorexs]

i think bounty hunter not a dumper, but investors do. they buy many with had big bonus that ico offer to them. and when it release in a market they sell all of they coin, so they have profits with bonus token that they had from bonus sale. that why most coin/token that has just release are dumped.

[Muzika]

Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

bounty hunters had the great part when it comes to the value of a particular coin, since they dont care what is the price of the coin because they only care about the fiat that they can earn they will just sell those coin acquired from participating in bounty program whatever the price is.

[5thFear]

There are all kind of bounty hunters. Some hodl some sell at the first chance. but a good coin won't be affected by them. It might get a dip early on but then it gets stable. But bounty hunters are a must for any project. Without them, no proper marketing can be done for the project.

[hacker1001101001]

Bounty hunters are just aiming to market any project and earn profits for their marketing. They are not interested in the. Working of the project they just need the credits for their marketing work so most of the bounty hunter just prefer exchange their earned tokens with BTC or ETH to keep their funds stable and always from the risky market of ICOs.

[Dimas99]

There are all kind of bounty hunters. Some hodl some sell at the first chance. but a good coin won't be affected by them. It might get a dip early on but then it gets stable. But bounty hunters are a must for any project. Without them, no proper marketing can be done for the project.

Right. not all participants actually do dump on the market. sometimes investors themselves also do it. we as a bounty hunter also see the potential of a token future whether good or not for hold

[suindendoshi]

Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

You have bad English my friend)))
bounty hunters, very often collapse the price of the coin, but not more than 5-10% of the total amount. Since coins allocated to the bounty is not much and therefore the fall will be small. And as for investors, here they can bring down the price of the coin.

[alendel0n7]

A competent project organizes the distribution of the bounty in such a way that the price does not suffer much. If the project is worthy, then it's the opposite for investors to buy at a good price. I think the situation is not critical at all.

[Fedrey]

A competent project organizes the distribution of the bounty in such a way that the price does not suffer much. If the project is worthy, then it's the opposite for investors to buy at a good price. I think the situation is not critical at all.

I completely agree with you, because if the project is promising, then the coin will be bought to whom. And if we talk about hunters for the Bounty, then the total pool of the Bounty has never exceeded several percent, which generally can not affect the market indicators.

[Renskin]

the number of tokens distributed by bounty companies does not exceed 1% of all sold tokens sometimes and very rarely this ancestor is over 3%. On the basis of the above, this percentage even if it is sold in one go or how it will not affect the course. Who?