[ANN][ICO] LANEAXIS (U.S Patented): Blockchain Solution For Transportaion

[Trrrt]

Yes bonus are good to promote and incentive people to invest in je first days but it’s also hard to manage. People could hesitate to invest ounce the bonus are over, so it’s a good way to incentive but it has to stay interesting even without the biggest bonus.

[1715145801]

1715145801

[1715145801]

1715145801

[1715145801]

1715145801

[1715145801]

1715145801

[Frank37]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

[belechau]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

I think so too. I fthere is a 50% bonus I automatically think that this is the real price. I wouldn't buy at a highr price.

Some people see it as a good attraction, others have this view that it is a forced way to drop tokens quickly, my opinion is that if there is no ongoing work after the ICO, or if there is no support at all times with positive feedback , can lead to evictions and regrets. Buying with caution is always the best option

For this reason I don’t like big bonuses, because of them there is always confusion, besides, it greatly influences the pricing when the first listing appears.

Actually, there is always some influence after the sale, when the listings begin, not all investors come in with the intention of insuring during the development of the project, for some, a small profit already something to come out

[belechau]

You have quite a big number of competitors in the supply chain's sector by the way, Vechain, Waltonchain, Ambrosus to name a few, how are you confident to make a better platform? I'd really like an answer to this question

I'm interested in that as well, beside some of them, now i don't recall which started already to go live with their tracking system. Unless you are planning to use it with existing pool of customers, may not be very easy to move forward.

Well, it is a very competitive sector but also it is a huge sector. There is a place for more than one solution. I believe they can succeed if they perform well.

You are right. Competition is always good for the end users as it keeps all the players in their toes to do better.

Right, stiff competition is a stimulus to better services and products, that is why monopoly is mostly forbidden in almost all spheres of life.

Yes, with good competition, companies can't be lazy. They need to do their best to get succeed.

I hope for the continuous work always, it is the obligation of the one who wants to leverage his project, but good competitors can give an incentive more to any Team. Although I see the work already applied some time in Laneaxis, which is enough for persistence and dedication

[Token Williams]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

[zgrdyg]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

[belechau]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

[rjp55]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea.

[MattLeBlanc]

You need lots of experience to run a professional work like this and I see great team work as well as professional marketing strategies by the team to get more attention. Definitely a plus point for the development.

[levyashin]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

[jonnytracker]

I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.

But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.

Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error.

It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this.

I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus?

50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges

I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project.

Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program

I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it.

I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before.

For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually

i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea.

so like those taxi service and other public services this transportation make use of the blockchain right ?

[the_donald]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

[cevap]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

[ParRus]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

[levyashin]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

[Amelie Poulain]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

It's true, but on the other hand there will be few participants in such a bounty program, and this action will be ineffective. I think that the best way when bounty budget somewhere in the middle.

[Jepli]

You need lots of experience to run a professional work like this and I see great team work as well as professional marketing strategies by the team to get more attention. Definitely a plus point for the development.

Indeed I agree. This project will be the culmination of several years of experience and hard work. Additionally, more patent approvals are on their way any time soon.

[viljy]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

On the other hand, airdrop affects the price of tokens even worse than big bonuses or bounty campaigns. And now there are a lot of projects that simply distribute their tokens, which in the end cost almost nothing.
At least they don't do that here.

[pynetx]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.

[jonnytracker]

Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.

In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing.

agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects.

In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know.

They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing.

I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump.

Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about.

You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump.

I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later  ?