Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 07:50:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Count down to Iran invasion  (Read 41916 times)
J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 29, 2013, 12:32:47 PM
 #241

Why was this bumped? Clearly OP was wrong...
1713901853
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713901853

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713901853
Reply with quote  #2

1713901853
Report to moderator
1713901853
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713901853

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713901853
Reply with quote  #2

1713901853
Report to moderator
1713901853
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713901853

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713901853
Reply with quote  #2

1713901853
Report to moderator
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
July 29, 2013, 04:40:28 PM
 #242

Why was this bumped? Clearly OP was wrong...

You are right, why have a clearly decent discussion when we can spend time being right!
J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 29, 2013, 04:47:30 PM
 #243

Why was this bumped? Clearly OP was wrong...

You are right, why have a clearly decent discussion when we can spend time being right!

What discussion is there to have, at least on this thread? Clearly there was no invasion, and I still think that there won't be. Why did you choose to necro it two years after it was started anyways? If you have new evidence, why bump this as opposed to making a new thread?
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2013, 06:13:15 PM
Last edit: July 31, 2013, 07:18:43 PM by TECSHARE
 #244

Why was this bumped? Clearly OP was wrong...

You are right, why have a clearly decent discussion when we can spend time being right!

What discussion is there to have, at least on this thread? Clearly there was no invasion, and I still think that there won't be. Why did you choose to necro it two years after it was started anyways? If you have new evidence, why bump this as opposed to making a new thread?

You are so right! Certainly nothing related to discuss...

Thousands of Syrian police who joined the rebels are on U.S. payroll
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/07/25/thousands-of-syrian-police-who-joined-the-rebels-are-on-u-s-payroll/

Syria's rebel commander expected to visit United States
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-07-18/news/sns-rt-us-syria-usa-idriss-20130718_1_rebel-commander-rebel-group-supreme-military-council

Russian Military on Alert After Suspected Israeli Airstrike Destroys Russian Missiles in Syria
http://guardianlv.com/2013/07/russian-military-on-alert-after-suspected-israeli-airstrike-destroys-russian-missiles-in-syria/

Israel reacts positively to Egypt coup
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/22/314947/israel-reacts-positively-to-egypt-coup/

US And Russia Simultaneously Announce Intent To Arm Opposing Sides In Syria
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-russia-intend-to-arm-sides-in-syria-2013-7

US military chief outlines options for Syria
http://www.aawsat.net/2013/07/article55310850

Russia Rails Against US Arming Syrian Rebels
http://abcnewsradioonline.com/world-news/russia-rails-against-us-arming-syrian-rebels.html

CIA’s favorite Saudi prince is laying the groundwork for a post-Assad Syria
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/cia-s-favorite-saudi-prince-is-laying-the-groundwork-for-a-post-assad-syria-1.453434



Clearly none of this has anything to do with Iran. Nothing to see here, move along!


Damnsammit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2013, 06:27:12 PM
 #245

But CNN says I should be paying attention to OJ Simpson and a pot farm in Northern Cali...

Me so confoozled

Huh
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2013, 06:51:55 PM
 #246

But CNN says I should be paying attention to OJ Simpson and a pot farm in Northern Cali...

Me so confoozled

Huh


When the government is ready to attack Iran, CNN will tell you how evil the leader of Iran is and how you may die at any moment if he is not taken care of.

First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders  Of course we accept bitcoin.
Mike Christ
aka snapsunny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 01, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
 #247

I don't know what America's going to do, but it's certainly not going to sit on the world's most expensive military and do nothing while its dollar collapses.  Germany may not have been successful back then, but I doubt that'll stop a government as desperate as this one.

J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 01, 2013, 03:13:46 PM
 #248

Why was this bumped? Clearly OP was wrong...

You are right, why have a clearly decent discussion when we can spend time being right!

What discussion is there to have, at least on this thread? Clearly there was no invasion, and I still think that there won't be. Why did you choose to necro it two years after it was started anyways? If you have new evidence, why bump this as opposed to making a new thread?

You are so right! Certainly nothing related to discuss...

Thousands of Syrian police who joined the rebels are on U.S. payroll
http://www.worldtribune.com/2013/07/25/thousands-of-syrian-police-who-joined-the-rebels-are-on-u-s-payroll/

Syria's rebel commander expected to visit United States
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-07-18/news/sns-rt-us-syria-usa-idriss-20130718_1_rebel-commander-rebel-group-supreme-military-council

Russian Military on Alert After Suspected Israeli Airstrike Destroys Russian Missiles in Syria
http://guardianlv.com/2013/07/russian-military-on-alert-after-suspected-israeli-airstrike-destroys-russian-missiles-in-syria/

Israel reacts positively to Egypt coup
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/07/22/314947/israel-reacts-positively-to-egypt-coup/

US And Russia Simultaneously Announce Intent To Arm Opposing Sides In Syria
http://www.businessinsider.com/us-russia-intend-to-arm-sides-in-syria-2013-7

US military chief outlines options for Syria
http://www.aawsat.net/2013/07/article55310850

Russia Rails Against US Arming Syrian Rebels
http://abcnewsradioonline.com/world-news/russia-rails-against-us-arming-syrian-rebels.html

CIA’s favorite Saudi prince is laying the groundwork for a post-Assad Syria
http://www.haaretz.com/news/features/cia-s-favorite-saudi-prince-is-laying-the-groundwork-for-a-post-assad-syria-1.453434



Clearly none of this has anything to do with Iran. Nothing to see here, move along!




No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.
wdmw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 05:13:00 PM
 #249

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901
J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 01, 2013, 06:08:37 PM
 #250

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901

Quote from: Mohammad Ali Assoudi
"If America were to attack Syria, Iran along with Syria's allies will take action, which would amount to a fiasco for America,"

Quote from: Reuters
Assoudi's comments were first carried by the government-linked news agency Young Journalists' Club but were later apparently taken down from the group's website.

Quote from: Reuters
Iran and Syria signed a mutual defense pact in 2006, but little is known of its details, or whether there are any other signatories.

Sounds like a bunch of hot air coming from Iran. This "mutual defense pact" obviously hasn't seen much use, as Hamas has been attacking Assad yet it still receives Iranian funding. In any case, I doubt that Iran would be so foolish as to attack the US troops if Syria was invaded. They wouldn't stand a chance, and it would give Israel an excuse to crack down on neighboring Arab countries.

However, as far as I know the US government has no intentions to send actual troops in, so I don't see how Iran could be provoked into a war. I also don't see the point in going to war with Iran anyways, since whichever politicians advocated it would be committing political suicide.
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
August 01, 2013, 07:45:59 PM
 #251

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901

Holy shit! Some one who isn't brain dead!


Ah... ehhheem..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-to-send-4000-troops-to-aid-president-assad-forces-in-syria-8660358.html
porcupine87
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


hm


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 08:12:27 PM
 #252

Was Israel Behind a Deadly Explosion at an Iranian Missile Base?
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2099376,00.html

Explosion rocks Iran city of Isfahan, home to key nuclear facility
http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/2711

Iran Arrests 12 CIA Agents 'Planning Attacks'
http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16116722

Russia Warns US, Israel against Attack on Iran
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9007274505

Israel Considers Pre-Emptive Attack On Iran
http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16101552

TICK...TICK...TICK.........

Oh no, the time is ticking. Since neaarly 2 years the US will invade in the Iran in the next days Wink

"Morality, it could be argued, represents the way that people would like the world to work - whereas economics represents how it actually does work." Freakonomics
Bitware
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 926
Merit: 1001


weaving spiders come not here


View Profile
August 01, 2013, 08:24:25 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2013, 10:20:10 PM by Bitware
 #253

Oh no, the time is ticking. Since neaarly 2 years the US will invade in the Iran in the next days Wink

Please explain to me why the time-frame matters.

1,000,000 dead human beings will be the exact same tragedy 2 years from now as it would have been 2 years ago... as it would be today.

We have been chipping away at all Irans' allies and friends - the entire middle east - since the 1970's.
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 1958


First Exclusion Ever


View Profile WWW
August 01, 2013, 09:37:02 PM
 #254

People just enjoy masturbating their egos in public as if they get a prize for self proclaimed expertise. I bumped this discussion to, I dunno DISCUSS the issue, not to get +1 internets points in the hierarchy of basement dweller correctitude.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2384


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2013, 02:52:53 AM
 #255

You know what else is just around the corner?





+2 internets points for including a cat picture.

First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders  Of course we accept bitcoin.
Notanon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 02, 2013, 11:53:19 AM
 #256

Seems to me that Saudi Arabia would be more likely to initiate an attack on Iran, given the Shiite vs Sunni sectarian battles that have been going on for a long time. If anything, that would be the most likely start of a regional conflict and Israel would just join in for shits and giggles.
J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 02, 2013, 12:54:56 PM
 #257

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901

Holy shit! Some one who isn't brain dead!


Ah... ehhheem..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-to-send-4000-troops-to-aid-president-assad-forces-in-syria-8660358.html

Explain to me why the US would want to go to war with Iran? And also, since you didn't respond, why does this so called mutual defense treaty which has no known details not apply to Hamas?
wdmw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2013, 12:57:16 PM
 #258

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901

Holy shit! Some one who isn't brain dead!


Ah... ehhheem..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-to-send-4000-troops-to-aid-president-assad-forces-in-syria-8660358.html

Explain to me why the US would want to go to war with Iran? And also, since you didn't respond, why does this so called mutual defense treaty which has no known details not apply to Hamas?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar_warfare
J603
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 02, 2013, 01:10:40 PM
 #259

No, I think it has to do with Syria, from the looks of things. Last time I checked, Iran is not the same country as Syria, but I could be wrong. In any case, the major "opponent" of the US in the Syrian Civil War is Russia, but we are clearly not going to go to war with them over this one country.

They have a mutual defense treaty.  The US has been unsuccessful at provoking Iran, so they are trying to start a proxy war through Syria.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/01/us-syria-crisis-iran-idUSBRE88007120120901

Holy shit! Some one who isn't brain dead!


Ah... ehhheem..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-to-send-4000-troops-to-aid-president-assad-forces-in-syria-8660358.html

Explain to me why the US would want to go to war with Iran? And also, since you didn't respond, why does this so called mutual defense treaty which has no known details not apply to Hamas?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar_warfare

Unless I'm mistaken, the US does not import oil (or anything) from Iran, and there are economic sanctions on countries that do. If Iran started using the USD, it would make no difference as the US does not import oil from them anyways.

And again, why does this "mutual defense treaty" not apply to Hamas? If the US wants to provoke Iran, they're going to have to try harder because apparently going to war with Assad is not enough to warrant the stopping of funding, let alone military action.
wdmw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 02, 2013, 01:22:25 PM
 #260

The issue, as outlined in the wikipedia entry, is that they aren't using Federal Reserve Notes to transact their oil internationally.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!