BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 1378
|
|
December 31, 2019, 01:16:57 PM |
|
Congratulations on being wrong on this issue for over 8 years. That must be some kind of a forum record. Since one of your favorite habits around here is eating your own vomit and puking it back up again I am just going to reply the same way I did last time. I am happy to be wrong about this, however it is an accepted fact that many factions wish the USA to go into Iran, this is not even up for debate. One of the only ways regular people can prevent this action is public discussion and pressure on public officials to NOT let it happen. The fact is it is a very real possibility that has been planned since before 9/11 as anyone can read in the PNAC documents. Just because I was pointing it out years before anyone even noticed doesn't make me wrong, it just means I am ahead of the curve while children like you are only thinking in spans of weeks and months. This is something that has been in the works for decades and you simply are incapable of thinking that far ahead. Bone apple teeth. Are you suggesting that we use a bone sliver-chip rather than a toothpick to get the apple peel out from between our teeth? Anyway, who cares about the Iran invasion distraction. We have life to live.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
January 03, 2020, 11:44:09 AM Last edit: January 03, 2020, 12:00:22 PM by TECSHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
Sadlife
|
|
January 03, 2020, 12:07:39 PM |
|
If the US gov stop exploiting the middle east for resources like oil then all of these plot to attack the US soil would cease to exist in country's like iran or iraq or any other middle east countries. Just because the middle east declared that their banks will not back us dollar anymore. The american government got threatened cause they might loss their money making country. So they plot scheme's to overthrow the middle into chaos framing up its leaders like for example ghadafi.
|
▄▄▄▀█▀▀▀█▀▄▄▄ ▀▀ █ █ ▀ █ █ █ ▄█▄ ▐▌ █▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█ █ ▀█▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄█▄ █▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█ █ █ ▐▌ ▀█▀ █▀▀▀▄ █ █ ▀▄▄▄█▄▄ █ █ ▀▀▀▄█▄▄▄█▄▀▀▀ | . CRYPTO CASINO FOR WEB 3.0 | | . ► | | | ▄▄▄█▀▀▀ ▄▄████▀████ ▄████████████ █▀▀ ▀█▄▄▄▄▄ █ ▄█████ █ ▄██████ ██▄ ▄███████ ████▄▄█▀▀▀██████ ████ ▀▀██ ███ █ ▀█ █ ▀▀▄▄ ▄▄▄█▀▀ ▀▀▀▄▄▄▄ | | . OWL GAMES | | | . Metamask WalletConnect Phantom | | | | ▄▄▄███ ███▄▄▄ ▄▄████▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀████▄▄ ▄ ▀▀▀▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▀▀▀ ▄ ██▀ ▄▀▀ ▀▀▄ ▀██ ██▀ █ ▄ ▄█▄▀ ▄ █ ▀██ ██▀ █ ███▄▄███████▄▄███ █ ▀██ █ ▐█▀ ▀█▀ ▀█▌ █ ██▄ █ ▐█▌ ▄██ ▄██ ▐█▌ █ ▄██ ██▄ ████▄ ▄▄▄ ▄████ ▄██ ██▄ ▀█████████████████▀ ▄██ ▀ ▄▄▄▀▀█████████▀▀▄▄▄ ▀ ▀▀████▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄████▀▀ ▀▀▀███ ███▀▀▀ | | . DICE SLOTS BACCARAT BLACKJACK | | . GAME SHOWS POKER ROULETTE CASUAL GAMES | | ▄███████████████████▄ ██▄▀▄█████████████████████▄▄ ███▀█████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████▌ █████████▄█▄████████████████ ███████▄█████▄█████████████▌ ███████▀█████▀█████████████ █████████▄█▄██████████████▌ ██████████████████████████ █████████████████▄███████▌ ████████████████▀▄▀██████ ▀███████████████████▄███▌ ▀▀▀▀█████▀ |
|
|
|
TheCoinGrabber
|
|
January 03, 2020, 01:56:08 PM |
|
Thread suddenly relevant I see. You think the US will strike Iran first? I have a feeling that commander was smit due to the incident in the US embassy. Likely the US believe Iran was behind it (kinda similar to how it happened in Tehran).
|
|
|
|
Negotiation
|
|
January 03, 2020, 02:26:12 PM |
|
I think Iran's invasion is very difficult to count because when two countries center on a nuclear world, there is a war between them. And they are defeated in agreement Iran also ceases to exist with any of the Middle East nations of the United States of America Different chaos is created which is a threat.
|
|
|
|
Sutters Mill
|
|
January 03, 2020, 02:39:42 PM |
|
Thread suddenly relevant I see. You think the US will strike Iran first?
I doubt it. Under what grounds??? But I guess you can say they've already made the first move now with this attack but they'll just wait for a retaliation rather than a direct invasion. A lot of buzz about Iran retaliation with 'asymmetrical warfare' rather than with direct military response: https://twitter.com/ColinPClarke/status/1213071969719115777 https://twitter.com/lindseyhilsum/status/1213101525893074949Either way I think this is just going to escalate things across the middle east which isn't good. I don't think it's any secret that the US has wanted to invade Iran for a while and I'm surprised they haven't already. Trump previously seemed like he was against needless wars but he's got an ego so big that I think that would soon change if there was retaliation. I'm sure he'll have war hawks whispering in his ear as well. I don't think going to war would be good for his reelection campaign either assuming he isn't impeached before then.
|
|
|
|
enhu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1018
|
|
January 03, 2020, 02:49:56 PM |
|
Thread suddenly relevant I see. You think the US will strike Iran first? I have a feeling that commander was smit due to the incident in the US embassy. Likely the US believe Iran was behind it (kinda similar to how it happened in Tehran).
Yes I never thought the day will come they will really bomb Iran, its all over the news today. All my feed is telling about the general who died after the rocket strike. It does sound like US old trick. But this will lead media to blame Trump while he is also going to suffer the impeachment. In the news was that Iran pledge to retaliate to US, now this is going to get worse.
|
|
|
|
nutildah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 8485
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
|
January 03, 2020, 03:06:24 PM |
|
Congratulations on being wrong on this issue for over 8 years. That must be some kind of a forum record. Since one of your favorite habits around here is eating your own vomit and puking it back up again I am just going to reply the same way I did last time. I am happy to be wrong about this, however it is an accepted fact that many factions wish the USA to go into Iran, this is not even up for debate. One of the only ways regular people can prevent this action is public discussion and pressure on public officials to NOT let it happen. The fact is it is a very real possibility that has been planned since before 9/11 as anyone can read in the PNAC documents. Just because I was pointing it out years before anyone even noticed doesn't make me wrong, it just means I am ahead of the curve while children like you are only thinking in spans of weeks and months. This is something that has been in the works for decades and you simply are incapable of thinking that far ahead. Bone apple teeth. Right, so long as you admit that you're wrong, I'm good. For clarity, this is what you said in your OP: Hearing lots of rumblings from military personnel that an attack is now imminent within the next few weeks.
So, you were wrong only a few weeks after after you posted this thread. You were wrong then, you've been wrong 8 years since then, you're wrong today, and you'll be wrong tomorrow. This is something that has been in the works for decades and you simply are incapable of thinking that far ahead OK, so you've been wrong for decades apparently. My bad.
|
|
|
|
longyenthanh
|
|
January 03, 2020, 05:22:00 PM |
|
Iran and USA have concent on many issues. Iran supported USA to uproot sunni regime in Afghanistan and in Iraq. There is no profit for USA in attacking Iran. USA will never attack Iran.
|
|
|
|
yoseph
|
|
January 03, 2020, 05:49:48 PM |
|
Iran and USA have concent on many issues. Iran supported USA to uproot sunni regime in Afghanistan and in Iraq. There is no profit for USA in attacking Iran. USA will never attack Iran.
Just because they were all involved in battling ISIS doesn't mean that they actually have the same interests in the region. Iran have shown themselves to do anything to gain control over some parts of the region. Look at the ongoing war in Yemen between them and the Saudis because they are all want supremacy in that place. Trump said there was going to be a payback for attacking the embassy and now it's here.
|
|
|
|
johnwest
|
|
January 03, 2020, 06:05:10 PM |
|
Iran and USA have concent on many issues. Iran supported USA to uproot sunni regime in Afghanistan and in Iraq. There is no profit for USA in attacking Iran. USA will never attack Iran.
You can never say anything decisively about US. They are supporting the Soudi's and it is not a secret that Soudi and Iran are hardcore enemies. With the recent airstrikes, Iran might do something to damage US indirectly. World War III is already trending on Twitter.
|
|
|
|
Rikafip
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 6372
|
|
January 03, 2020, 10:26:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JollyGood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1793
Top Crypto Casino
|
|
January 04, 2020, 12:18:57 AM |
|
That was really hilarious... Where do you guys get that kind of stuff from.... Anyway, taking the opportunity to wish you a Happy New Year Rikafip Congratulations on being wrong on this issue for over 8 years. That must be some kind of a forum record. You are right, it has been over 8 years since the thread was started. I just looked at the thread creation date, it was started in October 2011 and now it is 3rd January 2020 Things have been developing recently in that region of the world, lots of political manoeuvring has been going on but I still do not see a war starting any time soon. Let us all hope for world peace.
|
|
|
|
KingScorpio
|
|
January 04, 2020, 12:26:55 AM |
|
Iran and USA have concent on many issues. Iran supported USA to uproot sunni regime in Afghanistan and in Iraq. There is no profit for USA in attacking Iran. USA will never attack Iran.
You can never say anything decisively about US. They are supporting the Soudi's and it is not a secret that Soudi and Iran are hardcore enemies. With the recent airstrikes, Iran might do something to damage US indirectly. World War III is already trending on Twitter. jes saudi and iran are enemies, for same reasons uk and soviet union uk and france uk and germany where enemies. republics don't have a defined financial systems, kingdoms however have that. therefore the money of republics is systematically untrustworthy, so rothschild owned and ran usa is supporting the monarchy in saudi arabia.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
January 04, 2020, 01:11:27 AM |
|
Right, so long as you admit that you're wrong, I'm good. For clarity, this is what you said in your OP: Hearing lots of rumblings from military personnel that an attack is now imminent within the next few weeks.
So, you were wrong only a few weeks after after you posted this thread. You were wrong then, you've been wrong 8 years since then, you're wrong today, and you'll be wrong tomorrow. This is something that has been in the works for decades and you simply are incapable of thinking that far ahead OK, so you've been wrong for decades apparently. My bad. Do me a favor? Take your selectively edited quotes and vomit eating to a private corner? It won't help you from making yourself look like an ass. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
TheCoinGrabber
|
|
January 05, 2020, 04:16:34 PM |
|
Thread suddenly relevant I see. You think the US will strike Iran first?
I doubt it. Under what grounds??? But I guess you can say they've already made the first move now with this attack but they'll just wait for a retaliation rather than a direct invasion. A lot of buzz about Iran retaliation with 'asymmetrical warfare' rather than with direct military response: https://twitter.com/ColinPClarke/status/1213071969719115777 https://twitter.com/lindseyhilsum/status/1213101525893074949Either way I think this is just going to escalate things across the middle east which isn't good. I don't think it's any secret that the US has wanted to invade Iran for a while and I'm surprised they haven't already. Trump previously seemed like he was against needless wars but he's got an ego so big that I think that would soon change if there was retaliation. I'm sure he'll have war hawks whispering in his ear as well. I don't think going to war would be good for his reelection campaign either assuming he isn't impeached before then. Thing is, we don't know how much of this is posturing. Iran released a statement that their retaliation would be military, to which Trump tweeted that they've already have targets they'll bomb, and brought out the incident in the embassy in Tehran, saying something to the effect that they'd bomb one for each person that was there.
|
|
|
|
VasilyS
|
|
January 05, 2020, 06:41:54 PM |
|
New war will affect the whole world and its economic system. Even countries that are far from the conflict zone, will suffer. Bitcoin price growth as a result of the conflict is very good piece of news, but I'm not happy imagining possible consequencies of the war... "US-Iran conflict and financial-economic situation in the world" https://www.cryptoprofi.info/?p=4926
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
January 05, 2020, 07:29:27 PM |
|
Iran Puts $80M Bounty on Trump’s Head"“If everyone anywhere in the world supports our initiative in Mashhad, on behalf of all of Iran’s people - 80 million Iranians - and each puts aside $1 US, it would equal $80 million,” the report said. “And we would give this $80 million, on our own behalf, as a gift to anyone who brings the head of the person who ordered the murder of the grand figure of our revolution.” If there were any doubt about whom the mullahs wanted assassinated, the statement concluded, “Anyone who brings us the head of this yellow-haired lunatic, we would give him $80 million on behalf of the great Iranian nation.”" https://pjmedia.com/trending/iran-puts-80m-bounty-on-trumps-head-for-soleimani-hit/Way to dig yourself a hole there Iran..
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
KingScorpio
|
|
January 05, 2020, 07:36:40 PM Last edit: January 05, 2020, 11:48:02 PM by KingScorpio |
|
Iran Puts $80M Bounty on Trump’s Head"“If everyone anywhere in the world supports our initiative in Mashhad, on behalf of all of Iran’s people - 80 million Iranians - and each puts aside $1 US, it would equal $80 million,” the report said. “And we would give this $80 million, on our own behalf, as a gift to anyone who brings the head of the person who ordered the murder of the grand figure of our revolution.” If there were any doubt about whom the mullahs wanted assassinated, the statement concluded, “Anyone who brings us the head of this yellow-haired lunatic, we would give him $80 million on behalf of the great Iranian nation.”" https://pjmedia.com/trending/iran-puts-80m-bounty-on-trumps-head-for-soleimani-hit/Way to dig yourself a hole there Iran.. oh thats not good that could lead quickly to war, iran is threathening, sadly middle east after that will be in an even bigger mess. i am getting tired of this shit, americans and their gazism sucks so hard. but islamism in the middle east threathens europe
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
January 05, 2020, 08:03:55 PM |
|
Figures this gives the US a green light to "erase" that Hassan Rouhani guy and his buddies?
BTW BTC is about $30k USD in Iran right now according to localbitcoins..
1BTC = a hair over 1 BILLION Iranian reals rials whatever they are..
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
|