Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[Aggioni]

I always take it into consideration, but i think it's very important to do your own research if you plan to invest money.

[Yalovtsev]

Not really, because the site can do anything, can write anything, propiaritsya so to speak,but in fact will be completely fraudulent,and just collect money and people will disappear,I recommend a very careful study of the team, if they have the implementation of anological projects that are successful, etc., in short, the whole analysis only then understand

[CoinCollect]

The ICO rating in most cases is set approximately the same and no ICO rating determines whether the ICO is a Scam, so I don't trust the ICO ratings.

[selfmukti]

It depends, for instance, ICODrops (one of my favorite sites) rates projects with a different approach. They give "high" or "very high" mark to projects in terms of possible ROI. So every site has a different evaluation, But I don't trust icobench for sure.

[boller]

Not really. Nowadays, many ICO ratings are available to visit. the websites always give the updates on each ICO offered by the developers. each site offers sometimes different features or reviews. there are some completed reviews and not. However, outside form the ICO rating, we also must have to analyze the ICO that will be participated. It is only to avoid the scams.

[aizen10]

Not all of high rating reviews are true, more of them are just a simply speculations, or paid to give a good quality reviews. But the most important things is do a self research and dont just believe on reviews from the sites. Although some of the investors are trying to believed and make investment for it, sooner or later after the ico they realized the real true.

[cola-jere]

Most of the ICO rating sites are paid sites. It's just good to read a summary of the project in these sites.
I don't believe the rating, IMO.

[Warry]

No, I don't. I don't trust any ICO rating sites out there . All ICO rating sites are also paid to promote for all ICO project ). You can take a look at all ICO rating sites and you'll see so many ICOs are not really well known but still have very high rate. LOL. It's the way ICO rating sites earn money .

[Rossey]

It is advisable for investors to do their own review/research other than solely depending on ratings site. Some of the rating site may be good but personal research is more preferable.

[Benabod]

I don't buy the idea of relying on the information on ICO rating websites because they are not reliable because at times they get paid for what they do therefore they compromise the standard of the job so ICO rating sites shouldn't be considered to determine good projects. Do your own research on your own

[Seriousbizz]

Thes are the ast sights you want to lay your trust in in the first place, There are high possibilities that there are biasness involved in rating, these days money influences everything, so some acn be paid to rate a poor quility project highly, hence misleading everyone in the process, This is not however the case to al, there are those that are quite honest and accurate with their rting, just try not using them in making important investment decisions

[PumaPuma_]

I think these sites are designed to collect more money for advertising projects. Who will give the best and the rating will be better. But it's up to you!

[hheight]

I prefer to use them just for information about ongoing campaigns or as a bounty finder. I don't pay attention to the ratings displayed by these sites, because I consider them subjective.

[travelhelperio]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

You catch the point buddy, Influencers and ICO sites charge back door payments for good reviews ranking & Tweets.Users trust and follow them and at the ends result declare as loss of money. At the same time a Good Concept struggling for the support which they  don't  get easily. but some people realize the value of their concept, not propaganda of mammoth startups and support them. world known them as warren buffett, tim draper so many others "list is long".

[Benarand]

You can sometimes listen to the opinions of experts and analysts. But close to not take this into account. You yourself need to make conclusions to invest in the project or not.

[AgatioX]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I just recently thought about them. When I was a beginner, I was sure that I can trust such sites as trackico, icobench etc. But I was told that estimates are put there for a reason (depending on how much the project team will pay). For this I now do not trust such sites at all

[bayarau]

I only trust my opinion, which is formed from the overall assessment of the ICO project on 5 or more rating resources. But from the majority of ratings my favorites are ICO Drops and Cryptodiffer. In Telegram chats of these projects, you can find out the maximum useful information about any prospective ICO, communicate with like-minded people in your native language and take the only right decision about the feasibility of investing!

[innokkk]

Sites with ICO ratings is a very relative evaluation of projects!
Also, ratings can be paid.
You can not trust such ratings 100%. It's necessary to do your own personal analysis of the project.

[Olayinka225]

ICO review sites are scams and a pusher to death.
I can't imagine what criteria they're using for the review, some of this sites or Youtubers didn't know much about all this project but some to increase the traffic of there own YouTube channel or website.
Quite many projects have been killed before of their fake, bad and negative comments or review have killed and send many projects to graves. And some many of the project they tends to believe in or rate high doesn't even do well in the market so what are we talking about.

ICO rating is a scam to this crypto space world

[quicysz]

ICO rating sites accept payments for the top spots, ICO rating sites may be misleading..