Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[Tory-Tory]

I don't pay attention to rating sites, it's long since everyone understands that stars and ratings are bought. I'm surprised why they still exist.

[1715452312]

1715452312

[1715452312]

1715452312

[kendra1107]

Not so much really coz these are paid ratings. But there are still some truths in their reviews. Though not accurate, we can still make these ratings as reference in choosing projects to invest in. I don't think we can even find a fully reliable reference when it comes to choosing which project to join. It is still up to us to make that vital decision.

[kynaz]

I don't pay attention to rating sites, it's long since everyone understands that stars and ratings are bought. I'm surprised why they still exist.

I think if there is a large amount of money they can buy and will be appreciated on that site. Personally I do not like this because I just want to invest in ICO projects that really have great potential and their development team must really work then the new investor has a good look at the project. The best advice is to never trust all ICO review sites and only trust your self

[xyandrobot]

I am not so sure about the ico assessment site. I only see whether the project is properly registered or not. For value I am not sure because it can be manipulated.

[clarkt]

ICO rating site with good track record should be trusted, still,  we need to also do our own finding out and place the ICO we are interested in on s parameters defined by us.  We should develop a template that scrutinized and rate ICO Individually!

[Bitcoincole]

I am not so sure about the ico assessment site. I only see whether the project is properly registered or not. For value I am not sure because it can be manipulated.

Yeah, you should never believe in a trust rating coming from the thread because that is only flowering tools for easy attract invrstors and hunters some of them are scammed ICO which it acted like a pro. Better to know more abount the project before it to decide in invest in.

[Derzkiy]

I clearly distinguish the description and characteristics of the project on the rating sites and the recommendations that the rating sites give. When I analyze an ICO project, I do not take into account the recommendations of rating sites, except those that describe the verification of the team.

[Falmera]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I really do not relyy decisions in any rating sites but it will also help us atleast to be aware of what is happening. But I will not directly believe in it but I will make sure the truthfulness of what has been presented.

[Anita1873]

The rating sites are helpful to understand the about ICO. But never should believe them fully all the time, because we all know very well that it may be manipulated and biased and you not get true information about these ICO. So always do your own research before investing in any project.

[Vasya]

ICO branch locales can't ensure that the ICO will run well and effectively. I want to peruse whitepapers from each ICO that I will put before taking an interest in them. there are numerous things in their whitepaper. how the undertaking functions, the development of the task, the course of the venture destinations is clear or not, and the group associated with it and that's just the beginning. there we can survey whether the ICO can create and run well.

[alttravel]

I do not trust, only sometimes the rating may coincide, an independent check is always necessary, because most ico ratings just pay for viewing and usually give 5 stars. Only own analysis of the crypto project.

[alttravel]

A lot of new ICO projects collapsed, despite the fact that the sites that established the ratings, evaluated the best estimates for such ICO projects. On the one hand, the crypto market has a very great influence, but you always need to conduct your analysis.

[gela888gela]

The ICO rating site is only one of the reference sources for examining ICO projects before investing. There are many other things that must be examined if you are going to invest, and the rating site is not a decision maker to invest or not.

[marksayson]

I think the accusations are still not quite solid because of just a verbal proof. I think the ico rating sites is still legit and good. Since they give a good advice to invest to a coin and turns out that their recommended coin is a success.

[True Vozer]

I only trust ICOBench, because rating on it is rated by dependent blockchain experts. You can pay money for 1 or 2 experts to get high rating but you can't pay for all. Furthermore, not all experts will receive your money to give high rating if your project is not good, because this will reduce their credibility.

[Anies_Sandi]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

You must be careful and smart in researching the ICO that you will follow because for now there are many ICOs that end in fraud and we don't get any rewards

[Kekyr]

As far as I know ICObench one of the platforms that are incorruptible, most of other platforms will do everything for money.

[genixye]

I think such websites can only be used for reference. Ratings will help me determine which ICO projects are worth investing in. But we should learn to be independent and make our own decisions.

[ljp7839008]

ICO Review, IcoTracker, Ico rating is the site rating and rating ico that I frequently use.
I estimate the accuracy of the project is about 60%. Anyway, they are experts, they will appreciate us better

Good site. I don't rely entirely on single site evaluation. I'm looking for a review of the ICO with 4-5 sites. And I try to build my own opinion on the basis of these reviews. Sometimes reviews are a little embellished. But still give less understanding about the project!

[facaxmcv5]

I think the site rating ICO does not give satisfactory results. sometimes even the site rating ICO gave an invalid assessment that eventually a lot of trapping. for ICO is even better to do the analysis yourself than to trust the site rating ICO unsatisfactory results.