Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[jekanmasin]

I do used ICO rating site to gather some information about their project. Where the project is aim on etc etc. Do their team a legit one or fake. It will save many time with this website and still I didn't trust their review about the projects cause nobody are perfect.

[texgeek]

As experienced on past, the biggest part of major icos  rating websites, when is paid, is better not trust...

But as example, IcoDrops, on my research not receive any value to list a ICO, so aparently is a good website rating ico.

[rltim555]

Not that much. at the beginning of my crypto path I believed, but now I've changed my mind about it. ICO rating sites are bullshit in most cases, so it is not for me. I stay away from ICo ratings

[Crypto Lady]

No, I try not to trust these sites. It seems to me that they provide false information in order to deceive investors and promote a deliberately fraudulent project.

[Simu111]

sure i do accept as true with them due to the fact that is in which a number of my statistics on my studies and i got here up if the ICO is a rip-off or now not due to the fact i understand that people who run ICO rating is a excellent while giving some information about ico projects.

[visionE2]

I think most ICO reviewers use an objective assessment in rating an ICO, I've always believed it even though I'm not 100% confident, aside from ICO reviews I usually analyze it in my own way like seeing the web, the team and the whitepaper

[Harrsionrangers10383]

ICO trackers is one option for investor ! There are so many way to check the project !

Some ICO trackers is good, you can refer to those sites.
Each site has a different rating, you can find some criteria at each site and collect it. Maybe it's will useful

[lorylore]

I will just use ICO rating sites as a reference because sometime those ICO rating sites are not independence enough. So I will do my research and read the whitepaper so that I can get more reliable information.

[Gryphet]

Certainly not fully trust , but sometimes listen , I think I probably even myself would be better to understand the projects and to examine their

[Endorphinity]

I do not trust these sites completely, but I take into account the information that they provide. I think that everyone should independently analyze the project.

[Zhenka]

I do not trust these sites completely, but I take into account the information that they provide. I think that everyone should independently analyze the project.

Often, information on such sites given the true, but to trust the rating provided on these sites is not necessary. Since many ICO projects buy rating the administration for the money. Hence we get inaccurate information.

[bennypagulayan]

I do not trust these sites completely, but I take into account the information that they provide. I think that everyone should independently analyze the project.

a number of information information that also also provide a value, but we we should be should be fully based on the given specified, please parse the way of we and the so that between the second will be possible perfect choice

[opv321]

If I were advising a friend who wanted to invest, I'd tell them to go straight to the sources (the white papers, the alphas, the team track records) and ignore the hype machinery.

[bekti3]

If I were advising a friend who wanted to invest, I'd tell them to go straight to the sources (the white papers, the alphas, the team track records) and ignore the hype machinery.

I agree with your argument above, even though not 100% trust Ico rating site, I still visit it, I need the ico list that is there, and then filter the ico based on the ico end date, it makes my job easier, ,

[dreico]

You shouldn't completely believe them. Ratings are deceptive, and so most of the scammers take advantage of it, setting themselves high bar on left-handed accounts.

[iwamoto77]

I do not trust ICO ratings of companies for 100% of course I use ICO rating as research information but I study the team,the technical side of the presented project,white paper on my own.

[Ngewex Yuk]

Of course, I always use the ICO rating for investment, and I'm happy because most are successful, even though they never guarantee profit but at least they have made a basic analysis of the truth of a project.

[h31s3nb3rg]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

Rating sites actually helps us to decide wether we invest or avoid a particular coin.  It gives us a good feedback so that we can decide properly so basically I trust some ico rating sites but there are some sites hype some coin because they been paid so be careful. 

[sorrros]

Of course, I always use the ICO rating for investment, and I'm happy because most are successful, even though they never guarantee profit but at least they have made a basic analysis of the truth of a project.

I also like this sites because here you can find many good information and with this information you can do your own opinion about the project, if invest or not.

[nangiarushali]

If there is a scam ICO project team planning to take all your money , why would they think before using a little amount to get higher ranking on these sites.So I do not trust these sites at all.