Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[myxamop]

No, it makes no sense to trust someone or services, they can not know for sure what will happen. They give an estimate, just like any ordinary person who analyzes the market, this is a common opinion.

I many times spoke and I will repeat still. Ratings are interested to give good marks. It is their work. Nobody will buy cryptocurrency and to use their services if they tell the truth to people.

[1714669428]

1714669428

[1714669428]

1714669428

[1714669428]

1714669428

[TomInVa57]

Rating is not the thing that shows real potential of the project. Most of 5 star projects were failed just like 3 start rated projects. So what is the point?

[vazarii]

Some are trustworthy like ICObench and Foundico

[MirclIX]

I do not trust such ratings. I doubt their objectivity. Moreover, it is difficult to predict the success of the project in the future in the high bear market. I think that it is best to evaluate the project yourself.

first of all, to invest you need to get as much knowledge in this area as possible. in order to assess the risks, you need to turn to many sources in order to objectively assess the current situation.

[tytanhamon04]

I pay attention to project evaluations but always listen to my own opinion. If you do not understand the projects and rely only on someone else's opinion it can be sad for you !

[MR_Klip]

I will start trusting ICO rating only when there be fully decentralized blockchain based rating, where experts need to show facts and not to make grades.

[Geenstijl]

Now I trust only one of them - ICODrops.com. I don't believe ICOBench or something like that after numerous evidences of cheating and bribing of "experts". Cryptomarket looks more and more like wild west with time. I wonder when it becomes fair and legit.

[herfianto]

Do not trus ICO rating sites, a high rating does not guarantee that an ICO will succeed. Many ICOs with high ratings lead to scams and fraud.

[mdenys]

I dont really trust these sites much but sometimes I pay my attention to their  rating of a particular Ico I am going to invest in or to take a part in bounty programm.I know that all raitings are paid by founders of projects but I just take a look at them for a  better research.

[Kumeco]

Do not trus ICO rating sites, a high rating does not guarantee that an ICO will succeed. Many ICOs with high ratings lead to scams and fraud.

be careful and do not be easy to believe, you better ask someone who knows more deeply, to avoid fraud or you can find out through anything to better understand it.

many people are deceived by the ICO branch site, and not all ICOs will succeed so you have to be more vigilant.

[nutriagrigia]

I advise you not to trust such sites, because many ICO buy an assessment of their project, and ordinary hunters begin to join these companies.

[chipzeru]

I'm only visiting ICO rating sites to find the upcoming ICOs but don't fully trust the rate there. I remember when C*ntra and Envi*n got high rating but ended up scam. In the end, we have to do our own research in order to make sure the project is legit. I usually go to the ICO's ann thread on this forum to keep up with the conversation. Just make sure that the user who get involved with the conversation is not a bot or fake.

[troiano9]

I would not trust any of them.  Most are easily manipulated with no real credibility.  Do your own research

[AliMan]

I would not trust any of them.  Most are easily manipulated with no real credibility.  Do your own research

I don't trust to any site about the ICO ratings because most of the time it can manipulate. I only trust what I saw and what I observe base on my own understanding. I think its better if you only trust your own research about the current situation of ICO because mostly its better than checking the ICO ratings site which sometimes or mostly is not true because it can change by someone. Its better if you have enough knowledge about it o you will be easy for you to know if the ICO is can be trust.

[SaracenRomero213]

Now I do not believe anyone. It seems to me that investments in ICOs bring losses and ratings can not point you to a quality project. The world of cryptocurrency has changed a lot.

[anjho.ace]

If we are talking a year ago or earlier then i will trust the rating website.
But for now? there are so many fake ratings due to amount they are receiving.
If you want the best rate then you should give some amount to them.
This is being popular now, that is why people are being wiser on their own way now.

[trash321]

Like most people, I do not trust sites that position themselves as rating ones, because they take responsibility that they don’t bear in the end, so I do not trust these sites and you are not advised to believe these sites.

[ginobitcoiner]

some ICO ratings have little influence on investor confidence or bounty hunters. because I'm not too sure about the ICO rating. they can only be used as references.

[BobBct]

It depends on what ICO it is, because i know there's alot of fake ratings for a ICO to make it like a quality ICO but ratings doesn't work for me, i don't depend on it and in a matter of fact i ignore it.

[paynercash]

some ICO ratings have little influence on investor confidence or bounty hunters. because I'm not too sure about the ICO rating. they can only be used as references.

To be honest, I do not quite believe in them, so there are so many scams on the internet now, if they rely on the machines to evaluate and index, they are not exactly accurate. The price of an ICO project requires a new human hand to look forward to