[ANN][XMY] Myriad | Multi-Algo, Fair, Secure

[neuroMode]

The first version for testing is ready of the Myriadcoin Android Wallet:

Download:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet/releases/download/v0.1.0-beta/myriadcoin-wallet-0.1.0-beta.apk

Source Code:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoinj
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet

If you have problems, send in the bug reports or send me a PM.

Awesome!

[xfelinho]

i installed it on 4.2.2 and it looks good so far

[hulk]

Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now

[kahir]

Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now

q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that

[Parana]

Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now

q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that

I love Keccak ( Sha3). On a R9 290 it makes 15 MH /s and you can play while mining, even on max intensity.

 

[cryptapus]

The first version for testing is ready of the Myriadcoin Android Wallet:

Download:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet/releases/download/v0.1.0-beta/myriadcoin-wallet-0.1.0-beta.apk

Source Code:
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoinj
https://github.com/HashEngineering/myriadcoin-wallet

If you have problems, send in the bug reports or send me a PM.

Installed on galaxy note 2, cyanogenmod 10.2. Works flawlessly (wish there were more active nodes, but that will come, not the client's fault).

As expected, dice games work well with this app, I'm happily gambling MYR while away from my qt client....

People, take advantage of the "donate" function in this client and send hashengineering some MYR, well deserved.

[hulk]

Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now

q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that

Although I agree but it just a trend for x11 right now.

[Wiseman]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know what to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

[primer-]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

The coin is broken and gatra, riecoin developer wrote about it earlier. Seems like 8bit did not fix it afterall. Someone message and ask gatra to take a look at the code now.

[neuroMode]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

Interesting, I'll run it by the guys

[mynameisjim]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

[neuroMode]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

Furthermore, I'd like to remind people that Myriad is the first multi-PoW coin, so there may be imperfections in the way the difficulties/reorganizations are handled. But these can always be solved, patched up, and understood better for the future. We don't have any coins to copy fixes from, we are at the frontier with Myriad and the problems we come across will be the blueprints for other inevitable copies/clones of Myriad's multi-PoW framework.

Think Bitcoin in the beginning years. You just don't know what weird anomalies may arise that you have to patch for. It's positive, it strengthens us in the long run, and we set precedents with the innovative foundation we build up with Myriad.

[iamphoenix]

rest assured I and likely others have been and made aware the developers of what i called block algo clustering.

so its been known for a while

[primer-]

Such price.

[iamphoenix]

Can x11 be added to Myriad algo please cause it is 1 of the hottest algo right now

q2c algo uses less electric than x11 .... why would miners want that

"x11 right now? is temporary

tomorrow someone will make an x22 with 22 algos shoved in there

--

[Zoella]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

Actually seems to happen rather frequently?

This is what, a block every 11 seconds?

261743   19:16:55   1   1000   21.323   261744000   29.1472   89.2086   34.26%
261742   19:16:52   1   1000   1049511.834   261743000   29.1472   89.2085   34.26%
261741   19:16:48   1   1000   20.897   261742000   29.1473   89.2085   34.26%
261740   19:16:23   1   1000   7721.761   261741000   29.1471   89.2082   34.26%
261739   19:16:21   2   2000   20.479   261740000   29.1472   89.2082   34.26%
261738   19:16:08   1   1000   20.069   261739000   29.1472   89.208   34.26%
261737   19:16:00   1   1000   19.668   261738000   29.1472   89.2079   34.26%
261736   19:15:30   1   1000   19.274   261737000   29.147   89.2076   34.26%
261735   19:15:23   2   10000   18.889   261736000   29.147   89.2075   34.26%
261734   19:14:59   1   1000   18.511   261735000   29.1468   89.2072   34.26%
261733   19:14:58   1   1000   18.141   261734000   29.1469   89.2072   34.26%
261732   19:14:56   1   1000   17.778   261733000   29.147   89.2072   34.26%
261731   19:14:42   1   1000   595.758   261732000   29.147   89.207   34.26%
261730   19:14:35   1   1000   17.422   261731000   29.147   89.2069   34.26%
261729   19:14:31   8   5010.726148   17.074   261730000   29.1471   89.2069   34.26%
261728   19:13:51   1   1000   16.732   261729000   29.1467   89.2064   34.26%
261727   19:13:49   1   1000   16.398   261728000   29.1468   89.2064   34.26%
261726   19:13:46   1   1000   16.802   261727000   29.1469   89.2064   34.26%
261725   19:13:43   1   1000   17.474   261726000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261724   19:13:39   1   1000   18.173   261725000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261723   19:13:38   1   1000   18.9   261724000   29.1471   89.2063   34.26%

[ahmed_bodi]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

Actually seems to happen rather frequently?

This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)

261743   19:16:55   1   1000   21.323   261744000   29.1472   89.2086   34.26%
261742   19:16:52   1   1000   1049511.834   261743000   29.1472   89.2085   34.26%
261741   19:16:48   1   1000   20.897   261742000   29.1473   89.2085   34.26%
261740   19:16:23   1   1000   7721.761   261741000   29.1471   89.2082   34.26%
261739   19:16:21   2   2000   20.479   261740000   29.1472   89.2082   34.26%
261738   19:16:08   1   1000   20.069   261739000   29.1472   89.208   34.26%
261737   19:16:00   1   1000   19.668   261738000   29.1472   89.2079   34.26%
261736   19:15:30   1   1000   19.274   261737000   29.147   89.2076   34.26%
261735   19:15:23   2   10000   18.889   261736000   29.147   89.2075   34.26%
261734   19:14:59   1   1000   18.511   261735000   29.1468   89.2072   34.26%
261733   19:14:58   1   1000   18.141   261734000   29.1469   89.2072   34.26%
261732   19:14:56   1   1000   17.778   261733000   29.147   89.2072   34.26%
261731   19:14:42   1   1000   595.758   261732000   29.147   89.207   34.26%
261730   19:14:35   1   1000   17.422   261731000   29.147   89.2069   34.26%
261729   19:14:31   8   5010.726148   17.074   261730000   29.1471   89.2069   34.26%
261728   19:13:51   1   1000   16.732   261729000   29.1467   89.2064   34.26%
261727   19:13:49   1   1000   16.398   261728000   29.1468   89.2064   34.26%
261726   19:13:46   1   1000   16.802   261727000   29.1469   89.2064   34.26%
261725   19:13:43   1   1000   17.474   261726000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261724   19:13:39   1   1000   18.173   261725000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261723   19:13:38   1   1000   18.9   261724000   29.1471   89.2063   34.26%

A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same

Ahmed

[iamphoenix]

Such price.

its ok we need a good troll to live on the forums.
when we all get enraged at his nonsense it motivates us to put a fund together so we can help Primer move out of his parents home and help him pay rent. And then who knows he may actually get a job!
Its a cry for help we need to help him. Think of poor misunderstood Smeagol.



Think of poor misunderstood Smeagol. All he wants is some attention and a shower.
If Primer thinks he can control the price with his magic powers let him!

[Zoella]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

Actually seems to happen rather frequently?

This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)

261743   19:16:55   1   1000   21.323   261744000   29.1472   89.2086   34.26%
261742   19:16:52   1   1000   1049511.834   261743000   29.1472   89.2085   34.26%
261741   19:16:48   1   1000   20.897   261742000   29.1473   89.2085   34.26%
261740   19:16:23   1   1000   7721.761   261741000   29.1471   89.2082   34.26%
261739   19:16:21   2   2000   20.479   261740000   29.1472   89.2082   34.26%
261738   19:16:08   1   1000   20.069   261739000   29.1472   89.208   34.26%
261737   19:16:00   1   1000   19.668   261738000   29.1472   89.2079   34.26%
261736   19:15:30   1   1000   19.274   261737000   29.147   89.2076   34.26%
261735   19:15:23   2   10000   18.889   261736000   29.147   89.2075   34.26%
261734   19:14:59   1   1000   18.511   261735000   29.1468   89.2072   34.26%
261733   19:14:58   1   1000   18.141   261734000   29.1469   89.2072   34.26%
261732   19:14:56   1   1000   17.778   261733000   29.147   89.2072   34.26%
261731   19:14:42   1   1000   595.758   261732000   29.147   89.207   34.26%
261730   19:14:35   1   1000   17.422   261731000   29.147   89.2069   34.26%
261729   19:14:31   8   5010.726148   17.074   261730000   29.1471   89.2069   34.26%
261728   19:13:51   1   1000   16.732   261729000   29.1467   89.2064   34.26%
261727   19:13:49   1   1000   16.398   261728000   29.1468   89.2064   34.26%
261726   19:13:46   1   1000   16.802   261727000   29.1469   89.2064   34.26%
261725   19:13:43   1   1000   17.474   261726000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261724   19:13:39   1   1000   18.173   261725000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261723   19:13:38   1   1000   18.9   261724000   29.1471   89.2063   34.26%

A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same

Ahmed

Nobody is spreading misinformation. I haven't seen one person state this was a double spend.

[ahmed_bodi]

Guys, i've just watched at blockchain and saw some strange things.
There are a lot of sequences, where a lot of blocks are generated almost simultanously by one algo. And i don't know to think You have to check, is it a problem with diffuculty adjusting, or just some suspicious fraud?

For example here (~20 blocks  instead of  1 by Scrypt in 2:30 minutes !!!)
Difficulty~20-30 is related to Scrypt

Block #       Generation time          Difficulty  
259265   2014-05-22 22:40:52   26.19   
259264   2014-05-22 22:40:50   25.666   
259263   2014-05-22 22:40:46   25.153   
259262   2014-05-22 22:40:41   3064.94522005   
259261   2014-05-22 22:40:34   4994.81   
259260   2014-05-22 22:40:24   24.157   
259259   2014-05-22 22:40:15   23.674   
259258   2014-05-22 22:40:02   23.2   
259257   2014-05-22 22:39:58   22.736   
259256   2014-05-22 22:39:57   22.281   
259255   2014-05-22 22:39:50   21.836   
259254   2014-05-22 22:39:49   21.399   
259253   2014-05-22 22:39:47   20.971   
259252   2014-05-22 22:39:42   20.552   
259251   2014-05-22 22:39:32   21.305   
259250   2014-05-22 22:39:21   22.157   
259249   2014-05-22 22:39:17   23.044   
259248   2014-05-22 22:39:13   23.965   
259247   2014-05-22 22:39:01   4894.912   
259246   2014-05-22 22:38:42   24.924   
259245   2014-05-22 22:38:36   25.921   
259244   2014-05-22 22:38:32   26.958   
259243   2014-05-22 22:38:31   28.036   
259242   2014-05-22 22:38:21   29.157

it's not a doublespend attack because there are few to no transactions in the blocks. this is a reorganization for sure. I'll ask the dev to look it up but they're common and all algos have them from time to time.

Actually seems to happen rather frequently?

This is what, a block every 11 seconds? All to the same address? (MREBM2LWmmxxAF1vYyfoEcpQhZjJ5fQpAQ)

261743   19:16:55   1   1000   21.323   261744000   29.1472   89.2086   34.26%
261742   19:16:52   1   1000   1049511.834   261743000   29.1472   89.2085   34.26%
261741   19:16:48   1   1000   20.897   261742000   29.1473   89.2085   34.26%
261740   19:16:23   1   1000   7721.761   261741000   29.1471   89.2082   34.26%
261739   19:16:21   2   2000   20.479   261740000   29.1472   89.2082   34.26%
261738   19:16:08   1   1000   20.069   261739000   29.1472   89.208   34.26%
261737   19:16:00   1   1000   19.668   261738000   29.1472   89.2079   34.26%
261736   19:15:30   1   1000   19.274   261737000   29.147   89.2076   34.26%
261735   19:15:23   2   10000   18.889   261736000   29.147   89.2075   34.26%
261734   19:14:59   1   1000   18.511   261735000   29.1468   89.2072   34.26%
261733   19:14:58   1   1000   18.141   261734000   29.1469   89.2072   34.26%
261732   19:14:56   1   1000   17.778   261733000   29.147   89.2072   34.26%
261731   19:14:42   1   1000   595.758   261732000   29.147   89.207   34.26%
261730   19:14:35   1   1000   17.422   261731000   29.147   89.2069   34.26%
261729   19:14:31   8   5010.726148   17.074   261730000   29.1471   89.2069   34.26%
261728   19:13:51   1   1000   16.732   261729000   29.1467   89.2064   34.26%
261727   19:13:49   1   1000   16.398   261728000   29.1468   89.2064   34.26%
261726   19:13:46   1   1000   16.802   261727000   29.1469   89.2064   34.26%
261725   19:13:43   1   1000   17.474   261726000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261724   19:13:39   1   1000   18.173   261725000   29.147   89.2063   34.26%
261723   19:13:38   1   1000   18.9   261724000   29.1471   89.2063   34.26%

A double spend is when inputs which have already spent are respent. So whoever that is spreading that misinformation needs to stop. That isnt what has happened. What has happened is the scrypt difficulty is so low that a person/group of people have been able to completely rape the diff. However you can see that every 2nd block it has retargeted and eventually will increase quite a bit. Next time the diff falls they'll do the same

Ahmed

Nobody is spreading misinformation. I haven't seen one person state this was a double spend.

I was stating for the facts as i know as usual primer~ will jump on saying it is.