[ANN][C2.1] Coin2 | Pow/PoS | ChainOfConflict[FPS] The Future of Gaming is Now

[Glen Hoddle]

How many wallets are there currently? Is there any way to find this out?

[gts476]

How many wallets are there currently? Is there any way to find this out?

Truthfully I don't know, only way to tell if through block chain analysis which I have not performed.

It is possible to do by writing a program to parse the block chain to remove and structure the data for you. (I'm not there yet, just about to start learning python and computational intelligence).

That said, if this is something you want it would be easy enough to hire someone to do in the dev section.

PM me if you want the graph OP to ask questions / ask him to restructure his program for c2.1

G

x

[tx42]

oh dear... whats happenning? :-(

i'll pm tx42 and flam and hear their complains/suggestions whatever and forward this to the board.

I sent a message with a deal, but I'm changing it.

The devs need to announce that they will burn all unclaimed C2 after a certain time and show how much they burned. They must also burn any that they have decided to award themselves with. All burn must be provable with TXIDs from the block chain.

That's the deal. The security hole is in the coin and the attacker is probably taking it as a challenge to kill C2 for a third time. If the extra coins are not burned, then I don't blame him and I won't help to stop him. I do know what the hole is.

I was offered to take over C2 from the original devs but I refused because, if I were to do it, I wouldn't have awarded myself anything. I would have kept the coin count exactly the same and would have even kept the 2.0 blockchain.

The solution that they came up with is the worst possible solution. It is a value transfer of about 40% from C2 holders to devs and exchanges. It is coin TARP.

[C2 NC2 NC2.0 TARP] - That would be better description of this coin.

[Glen Hoddle]

oh dear... whats happenning? :-(

i'll pm tx42 and flam and hear their complains/suggestions whatever and forward this to the board.

I sent a message with a deal, but I'm changing it.

The devs need to announce that they will burn all unclaimed C2 after a certain time and show how much they burned. They must also burn any that they have decided to award themselves with. All burn must be provable with TXIDs from the block chain.

That's the deal. The security hole is in the coin and the attacker is probably taking it as a challenge to kill C2 for a third time. If the extra coins are not burned, then I don't blame him and I won't help to stop him. I do know what the hole is.

I was offered to take over C2 from the original devs but I refused because, if I were to do it, I wouldn't have awarded myself anything. I would have kept the coin count exactly the same and would have even kept the 2.0 blockchain.

The solution that they came up with is the worst possible solution. It is a value transfer of about 40% from C2 holders to devs and exchanges. It is coin TARP.

[C2 NC2 NC2.0 TARP] - That would be better description of this coin.

If what you're saying is true, and I have no reason to doubt you, then it sounds like you would be a useful person to have around here IMHO.

[mymenace]

hey all I have downloaded the wallet coin2.1


I have 10 active connections but the wallet is still out of sync


ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000049eaf0475cbece
received block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287
ERROR: CheckStakeKernelHash() : min age violation
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 961b5d1dfd72f888cd836cbbebf4122a97cd27b7c48807e5d430ee0106691c7e, hashProof=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287ff2fbf23d004ea81c38dddbbd0aa3e5396abd7c54454
received block 00000033fca077c00691
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=9d9ff02f6482f633c287
received block 00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000033fca077c00691
received block 00000030b1793443975f
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
received block 0000002987300ca44bb0
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000030b1793443975f
received block 00000021d09f2baa0ead
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=0000002987300ca44bb0
received block 00000000052d9a2efdfc
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
received block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc08d78c5b831145fc80130ea662fc4066b09da87cfd2b
Added 7 addresses from 203.217.50.57: 27 tried, 324 new
connection timeout
trying connection 78.3.21.38:22222 lastseen=8.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 46.165.208.136:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
connected 46.165.208.136:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
trying connection 109.204.181.128:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
Added time data, samples 3, offset -10 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:64939, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
connected 109.204.181.128:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6ab8:28c9:9f0d:48c1:da87]:22222 lastseen=15.7hrs
Added time data, samples 4, offset -4 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:54079, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
connection timeout
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 lastseen=2.8hrs
connected [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
Added time data, samples 5, offset -1 (+0 minutes)
nTimeOffset = -4  (+0 minutes)
Moving [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 to tried
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:91:1963:8626:c423]:51021, them=124.176.45.251:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
trying connection 14.200.16.219:22222 lastseen=1.7hrs
Added 3 addresses from 2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204: 28 tried, 326 new
Added 1 addresses from 109.204.181.128: 28 tried, 327 new
connection timeout
trying connection 90.218.13.201:22222 lastseen=101.4hrs


last entries of the debug file


help would be appreciated

[n3lz0n]

hey I pm you please reply. thanks.

oh dear... whats happenning? :-(

i'll pm tx42 and flam and hear their complains/suggestions whatever and forward this to the board.

I sent a message with a deal, but I'm changing it.

The devs need to announce that they will burn all unclaimed C2 after a certain time and show how much they burned. They must also burn any that they have decided to award themselves with. All burn must be provable with TXIDs from the block chain.

That's the deal. The security hole is in the coin and the attacker is probably taking it as a challenge to kill C2 for a third time. If the extra coins are not burned, then I don't blame him and I won't help to stop him. I do know what the hole is.

I was offered to take over C2 from the original devs but I refused because, if I were to do it, I wouldn't have awarded myself anything. I would have kept the coin count exactly the same and would have even kept the 2.0 blockchain.

The solution that they came up with is the worst possible solution. It is a value transfer of about 40% from C2 holders to devs and exchanges. It is coin TARP.

[C2 NC2 NC2.0 TARP] - That would be better description of this coin.

[tx42]

hey all I have downloaded the wallet coin2.1


I have 10 active connections but the wallet is still out of sync


ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 961b5d1dfd72f888cd836cbbebf4122a97cd27b7c48807e5d430ee0106691c7e, hashProof=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287ff2fbf23d004ea81c38dddbbd0aa3e5396abd7c54454
connection timeout
trying connection 62.1.215.186:22222 lastseen=1.0hrs
Flushed 343 addresses to peers.dat  19ms
connection timeout
trying connection 213.120.210.194:22222 lastseen=1.0hrs

last entries of the debug file


help would be appreciated

You need to provide a few lines prior to that error from your log file.

[n3lz0n]

your wrong TX, it was announced way before the coin was exchanged that the amount would be 100 mill.
this is common knowledge for almost a week.

It wasn't in the OP. Buried in the spam and fud of the comment section does not count.

That's just part of the incompetence.

IRC ?
kiwiirc.com/client/irc.freenode.net/?nick=n3lz|?#Coin2

[mymenace]

hey all I have downloaded the wallet coin2.1


I have 10 active connections but the wallet is still out of sync


ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000049eaf0475cbece
received block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287
ERROR: CheckStakeKernelHash() : min age violation
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 961b5d1dfd72f888cd836cbbebf4122a97cd27b7c48807e5d430ee0106691c7e, hashProof=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287ff2fbf23d004ea81c38dddbbd0aa3e5396abd7c54454
received block 00000033fca077c00691
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=9d9ff02f6482f633c287
received block 00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000033fca077c00691
received block 00000030b1793443975f
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
received block 0000002987300ca44bb0
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000030b1793443975f
received block 00000021d09f2baa0ead
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=0000002987300ca44bb0
received block 00000000052d9a2efdfc
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
received block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc08d78c5b831145fc80130ea662fc4066b09da87cfd2b
Added 7 addresses from 203.217.50.57: 27 tried, 324 new
connection timeout
trying connection 78.3.21.38:22222 lastseen=8.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 46.165.208.136:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
connected 46.165.208.136:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
trying connection 109.204.181.128:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
Added time data, samples 3, offset -10 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:64939, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
connected 109.204.181.128:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6ab8:28c9:9f0d:48c1:da87]:22222 lastseen=15.7hrs
Added time data, samples 4, offset -4 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:54079, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
connection timeout
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 lastseen=2.8hrs
connected [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
Added time data, samples 5, offset -1 (+0 minutes)
nTimeOffset = -4  (+0 minutes)
Moving [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 to tried
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:91:1963:8626:c423]:51021, them=124.176.45.251:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
trying connection 14.200.16.219:22222 lastseen=1.7hrs
Added 3 addresses from 2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204: 28 tried, 326 new
Added 1 addresses from 109.204.181.128: 28 tried, 327 new
connection timeout
trying connection 90.218.13.201:22222 lastseen=101.4hrs


last entries of the debug file


help would be appreciated

You need to provide a few lines prior to that error from your log file.

updated prior lines
 

[42coin fever]

Gosh! To those who think Coin2 is scam, Shall I repeat it again by remind you that 'dip your dick' into Crypro- currencies bet on making big bucks is like buying Goldmine exploration company stock hoping to get rich or buying internet technology pray for becoming billionaire, you just never know when you'll be screwed by someone else dick from behind because yours is out of touch in reality.
Get the picture? Bre-X and Global Crossing respectively are 2 best examples. They didn't exactly scam you but rather run by the wrong people from beginning.  Investors buy with blind vision with a dick hide in the ass. Same as Crypto- currencies, more than half of the coins operated under the disguise of  new creative improvement over borrowed codes but actually same shits as you wanted to call it. Most failed and few survive with devs grab his own groins spy around for inspiration for another round of  clone-o-venture. Only fraction of the Dev made it. Crypto tech is just like any form of business opportunity, one success story follow by many emerge copycats or setup indentical shops next door with new creative dressing.

Coin2 increased number of coins after each attack, wasn't a grand scheme to scam you but rather a critical survival decision or fold.

Cheer

[roslinpl]

Tx42 listen up as I got enough of reading your asstalk posts.

All of us KNEW that c2.1 will have 100M coins - you are the one who didn't realize it ... It was written in the OP since c2.1 OFFICIAL release.

Your idea to FORCE devs to BURN their coins is IDIOTIC.
Ask Satoshi to burn his Bitcoins you troll.

Why should they do this? Because it is your will? Get lost man.

Nobody ask you to come in and just because you bought some coins and now price went a bit down you are angry.

I AM 10000% sure - that if situation would be different and you would gain some ++ I am damn sure you won't be trolling and blackmailing.
You are - cause you are crying baby who bough coins and now you have to wait for some profits - you though you will earn $$$$ in a day or what?? Are you a newbie in crypto-world? You seems to be.

COIN is created by developers and THEY decide what they will do and what they will not do.
AND YOU DECIDE will you join it or no - you decided to join and now you are trolling and talking shit with a try to spread a FUD.

In my opinion you are "silly" ... as I don't want to abuse you ... but worst words are on my mind ... just I am trying to be kind for you.



And you know what? To payout exchanges and people - there WASN'T other way than ++ a number of coins!


And you know what else ? This coin damn rules and I don't see any problems with receiving and sending. I don't see any attacks and WE WON'T SEE THEM.

♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
..:: C2.1 NETWORK IS SECURE! ::..
♥ C2.1 NETWORK IS SECURE! ♥
-= C2.1 NETWORK IS SECURE! =-
.oO0 C2.1 NETWORK IS SECURE! 0Oo.
*** C2.1 NETWORK IS SECURE! ***
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥

PS. maybe you are angry because you cannot make attack? hehehe...
Next time before you will use your ass instead of a mouth to talk - fart out some proofs or shut up and go back to your bridge.

Regards.


PS. PEOPLE PLEASE ... ignore tx42 ( you can press "ignore" button below his nickname next to his post )

[cyberhacker]

what is fucking going on?

OP is saying C2 will get help from tx42.

and following post is saying he is spamming.

who shall we trust?

[KingArbinV]

what is fucking going on?

OP is saying C2 will get help from tx42.

and following post is saying he is spamming.

who shall we trust?

honestly i have no idea what is going on man, i just got here, been out running around today, lol.. i need to ask nelson whats up

[roslinpl]

what is fucking going on?

OP is saying C2 will get help from tx42.

and following post is saying he is spamming.

who shall we trust?

dunno yet we will see what the truth is.

IF tx42 will help to develop better wallet - he will gain a respect - for now with no evidences and just "talking" in my eyes he is a troll

I am going to sleep.

Nite.

[42coin fever]

2 miners in the mining room?

I still think best solution is create a permanent solution by creating a Coin2X or Xcoin2 with 100K coins only.XCoin2 is also an independent entity itself.  It eventually will be recognize by future Coin2 a roughly 1/1000 inter-tradeable within wallet or trade at listed exchange rate. Both coins share mining operation until Coin2 fully out of scrypt shadow. Then transform xCoin2 into something that will assist future in the event of hashrate needed for better firewall...etc.

[wodezhutiq]

How many wallets are there currently? Is there any way to find this out?

you can see it is very interested in, has distinguishing feature.

[zyronx]

Wow, are you sure you want a troll working on a wallet! Ok! this is new! 

[lolfuckers2]

That's the deal. The security hole is in the coin and the attacker is probably taking it as a challenge to kill C2 for a third time. If the extra coins are not burned, then I don't blame him and I won't help to stop him. I do know what the hole is.

Nope. Proof-of-concept attack done (1/2/3), enough for me.
I got about 100 BTC from NC2 and decided to leave these kids with their oh-so-innovative shitcoin.
I even tell em how to stop me.

And I do not aware of any security holes in C2.1 except this one (well-known to all but C2 "devs").
But (!) if you do know some interesting vulnerability, share it and we'll definitely make some fun

[42coin fever]

                    Coin2 Faucet reset n ready.
http://coin2.altcoinfaucet.net/
              

[mymenace]

hey all I have downloaded the wallet coin2.1


I have 10 active connections but the wallet is still out of sync


ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000049eaf0475cbece
received block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287
ERROR: CheckStakeKernelHash() : min age violation
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: check kernel failed on coinstake 961b5d1dfd72f888cd836cbbebf4122a97cd27b7c48807e5d430ee0106691c7e, hashProof=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block 9d9ff02f6482f633c287ff2fbf23d004ea81c38dddbbd0aa3e5396abd7c54454
received block 00000033fca077c00691
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=9d9ff02f6482f633c287
received block 00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000033fca077c00691
received block 00000030b1793443975f
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000064ce1f1ad31cf1
received block 0000002987300ca44bb0
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=00000030b1793443975f
received block 00000021d09f2baa0ead
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=0000002987300ca44bb0
received block 00000000052d9a2efdfc
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK, prev=dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
received block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc
ERROR: CheckProofOfStake() : INFO: read txPrev failed
WARNING: ProcessBlock(): check proof-of-stake failed for block dc80aea38e6f0b24d4cc08d78c5b831145fc80130ea662fc4066b09da87cfd2b
Added 7 addresses from 203.217.50.57: 27 tried, 324 new
connection timeout
trying connection 78.3.21.38:22222 lastseen=8.8hrs
connection timeout
trying connection 46.165.208.136:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
connected 46.165.208.136:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
trying connection 109.204.181.128:22222 lastseen=0.8hrs
Added time data, samples 3, offset -10 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:64939, them=46.165.208.136:22222, peer=46.165.208.136:22222
connected 109.204.181.128:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6ab8:28c9:9f0d:48c1:da87]:22222 lastseen=15.7hrs
Added time data, samples 4, offset -4 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=121.217.59.220:54079, them=109.204.181.128:22222, peer=109.204.181.128:22222
connection timeout
trying connection [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 lastseen=2.8hrs
connected [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
send version message: version 60008, blocks=1441, us=121.217.59.220:22222, them=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
Added time data, samples 5, offset -1 (+0 minutes)
nTimeOffset = -4  (+0 minutes)
Moving [2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222 to tried
receive version message: version 60008, blocks=8499, us=[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:91:1963:8626:c423]:51021, them=124.176.45.251:22222, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204]:22222
trying connection 14.200.16.219:22222 lastseen=1.7hrs
Added 3 addresses from 2001:0:9d38:6abd:3076:2831:834f:d204: 28 tried, 326 new
Added 1 addresses from 109.204.181.128: 28 tried, 327 new
connection timeout
trying connection 90.218.13.201:22222 lastseen=101.4hrs


last entries of the debug file


help would be appreciated

help please