Why is signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media?

[Docbee]

Social media campaign have opportunity of reaching out to more people than signature judging with population facebook alone is enough i don't know reason proportion of pool given to signature is much it has been like that since i join bitcointalk.

[DamilolaB]

Well, I that is your own way of looking at it. There will definitely be a difference in signature campaign and that of social media because there is difference in task that is required from the both. To be honest, it is not really easily to post something reasonable on btt unlike social media that will just require liking and sharing posts. Also to attain the rank to qualify for participating in signature campaign is not gotten easily.

[JembatanMerah]

in my opinion, this is because the bounty signature focus more with people where they are the ones who are interested in their own could even ICO as an investor. so the signature can be said the bounty more appropriate target in selling a token increase sales and project of the bounty on the other. so it's no wonder a larger allocation.

[Obiwankenodium]

The only audience you reach on Twitter/social media are bots, shittalking shillers and no coiners. So not exactly the audience you want to reach.

[mostkey]

Of course the most important thing is in this forum because it has been proven that we are crypto lovers and have guaranteed publications for the future of the project so that most people think that telling crypto users is the most appropriate and accelerating the promotion process, unlike many social media who knows that with crypto they may underestimate it, and the level of signing and social media work is very different, I believe that the most extra signatures really think in making constructive posts that are not reposted.

[kateycoin]

Because in social.media campaign the only thing you will do is share or repost it but in signature campaign you use your brain to share whats your best opinion you will give to threads in this forum. In signature we need a constructive answer in any thread we reply.

[5ensei]

Not many people like to do signature campaigns because it is more work and you can only do 1 campaign at a time. Imagine joining a campaign lasting 3 months and then discovering that they didn't reach the soft cap. That would be a waste of 3 months work, whereas in social media you can join multiple campaigns.

[Denton]

In fact, the signature and social networks mostly attract new bounty participants, not investors. So they don't make much sense. But if to compare, then repost to do can all, and here is have high rank on forum and write good posts, to participate in discussions on forum can not all. Although it is not so difficult. Therefore, the signature is paid more.

[vallydelly]

Signature campaign has the high allocation to social media because bitcointalk forum is a crypto related forum and many people here in the forum might see the signature and invest in the ICO, unlike the social media,

[lunaelucemauram]

The reasoning to that by bounty managers is that hot leads vs cold leads. In this forum where many people are already aware in cryptocurrency there is a higher probability that the signature will attract potential investors or even new bounty hunters in the ICO hence a hot lead. While in Social media campaigns even though there are many people to advertise the ICO most of them is ether really not interested specially in platforms such as Facebook and Twitter or they do not know what it hence the cold lead.

[gabum19]

In my opinion, signature campaign is more higher rewards from social media bounties because it us more focus from advertising the said project ico by using their avatars and signature labels through out the community. Here in this forum there are many investors are looking for a great project to invest. The more users they saw wearing those signature it means a lot for an investors that it is a great project.

[vossybiglady]

Direct marketing to your main audience is better than peppering social media to people who may not even know what crypto is.  The signature campaign is also much more difficult to complete.  I bet the signature campaign sells more coins that Facebook and Twitter combined. 

[mazesta]

maybe because the "signature" is on a platform that specifically discusses crypto, so users are automatically people who like crypto so marketing a project will be better.

[kawetsriyanto]

It is because the signature can be more effective in promoting to investors. Investors should get the information mostly in crypto forum. So the possibility to get investors through signature campaign will be bigger than social media.  

[nunibanuni]

Actually its not that way. The reason why you can get more in signature campaign than social media is the number of participants. Some of the ICO are allocating 10-15% for the signature campaign and 20% in social media.

[iwah]

No doubt bitcointalk is a crypto forum, it is strictly crypto currency and blockchain related forum and community, so this is a right place to do your bounty campaign because anyone seeing your signature will check it out and probably invest in the ICO

[o.ogurlu]

I think there are two reasons for this. The first reason is that you should write post about only certain topics in the biggest forum site in the crypto world for the signature campaigns. And at the same time you can only join a signature campaign. But there is no such restriction in social media campaigns.

[Romich93]

In social campaigns, much less action and knowledge is required. Also there is less target audience, unlike this forum. In signature s campaigns you need to spend much more effort and time.

[akosijue]

I think its because of the effort and to filter most bounty hunters. For the efforts, you'll have to be posting in different forums for the signature campaign, doing this will be more effort than just sharing a post from social medias. And for filtering bounty hunters, like what I said first, it requires more effort so that lazy bounty hunters or those who do many bounties can only participate on signature campaign, but if a bounty hunter had several Bitcointalk accounts, then it will all change, but I think bitcointalk has a way of finding multiple accounts having the same IP address.

[Dessy88]

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

maybe the signature is more profitable than social media because in social media there are not many people who know about crypto, bro, if using signatures there are likely to be many investors who see, so the gift for signatures is greater than social media