Why is signature apportionment always high than that of Social Media?

[tokyojapan77]

Signature campaigns on the bitcointalk forums will reach the right target audience and search easier than the Social Media campaign.

[Yramesor0]

The signature campaign is not an easy thing compared with social media. You need to have a constructive post and informative ideas to be able to share with others especially to newcomers. Besides a thousand of members here in forum bounty hunters and investors who will read your posts and can see the signature you are wearing will attract more investors and will to try to reach the site and see if the projects we are promoting is for good or not before trying to invest.

[sanasara]

I think signature campaign is more powerful then others because in social media there are different categories of people but in forum there is only the traders and the people who is related to crytpo trading are there so it is more eaiser way to get connected to the people related Icos and work of crypto currencies.

[selenophile]

Campaign manager allocate more stakes to those signature campaign participants because that's the best way on how they could introduce their projects to the market. While the participants are posting on different threads, they also wear the signature of the particular ICO project.

[tuanytcc]

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Because the signature campaign require you must have writing skills and ranks to participate. It is more complex than social media campaigns, so its reward is higher is reasonable thing

[sunshinelavapie]

In my opinion, social campaigns are not as effective as a signature campaign. Beginners and learn about ico will participate in the forum and they will feel confident when the high rank members are signed on 1 ico. The current media is quite thin, and most are non-quality ads.

[mgrbtc]

I agree with the previous commentators - the signature company is designed for a narrower range of people interested directly in cryptocurrencies.  Social networks, although they have more coverage, do not affect so many potential investors.

[oludare1]

Signature campaign can only be done through bitcointalk form. The bitcointalk forum is the largest community of the crypto investors. As a result of this, bitcointalk forum is the largest platform through which a project can be promoted.  Through the signature of the promoting members, investors that are willing can know more about such project.
Signature campaign is not as porous as that of social media where anyone can just open account whenever they like and it is ready for you.
Also, social media is more of bounty hunters than investors.

[dimonstration]

In my opinion, social campaigns are not as effective as a signature campaign. Beginners and learn about ico will participate in the forum and they will feel confident when the high rank members are signed on 1 ico. The current media is quite thin, and most are non-quality ads.

In signature campaign you wear an avatar and signature of the campaign to promote and gather an investor for  the project that you joined. In social media of course is also to promote but not that like in signature because the big investor and almost all people that having an interest in crypto currency will be here in forum. That's the reason why signature campaign are having a high percentage of rewards than social media campaign.

[sherenikaw]

Yes, the signature campaign commonly gets higher rewards than the social media. Firs is about its involvement in which the signature participants must have qualified posts in the bitcointalk forum only. The posts must be qualified and on topic as stated in the rules. Additionally, it obligates the participants to wear the signature, personal text, or avatar during the bounty campaign or ICO. Therefore, I think signature participant is suitable to get higher rewards.

[googs84]

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Thats a good analysis but I don't think you are right about the participation number. If you are talking about the BTC based signature campaigns then surely they will have high participation because people get paid in the form of BTC which is direct payment method and it is also very much trusted.

Apart from this if you talking about the bounties then I dont think there is high numbered participation in them because bounties are too many and people can join only one campaign at a time.

Social media participation are always higher. Thats my observation and its true I guess.

[SPdiginomads]

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Do you know why signature more relatively given high proportion on bounty campaign? It is because the target audience. Its plays a big role and most of the part you are on a crypto sphere with lots of potential investors talking about cryptocurrency. Unlike on social media not all of the audience are aware what cryptocurrency and how to invest. So quality over quantity you know the math.

[DarkBullet]

Actually through other social media you may reach more people but signature campaign is more effective because you reach only those people who are totally involved in crypto world and are looking for suggestions and solutions to their queries.

I agree. There are thousands of altcoin investors here in this forum who are more knowledgeable about cryptocurrency than those person on your friends on your social media accounts. Besides, how many of those friends are seeing your post about the ICO you are endorsing? I believe that only 5% to 10% of your friends can only see your post and there is a small chance that they will invest to that ICO. Signature campaign have lesser participants but reaches higher numbers of investors because of this forum.

[rijaljun]

Why the signature allocation is always higher than other? It is because their main target investors is bitcointalk users. Bitcointalk is on of the oldest and best Bitcoin forum, ETH and other great successful cryptocurrencies was born here.

[krassy]

Active members of the forum participate in the discussion of different topics and give advice in different posts, the higher the rank of the participant the more confidence it causes in other users, among whom there are many investors and traders, so the signatures of such members of the forum cause trust and attract attention.Therefore, signature campaigns are considered very profitable, they are targeted at attracting the attention of potential investors and advertising projects.

[Volk-05]

Because the signature works among people who already have to do with the crypto currency.

[lukeclick]

I think that  it is because the work is usually more tedious, and you spend way more time carrying out tasks for signature bounty campaigns. In addition, the forum has a larger audience that is reached, and this may be why people who partake in signature bounties tend to have the highest stakes allocated to them.

[GromovSer]

Now the companies can catch easily users having promised them for a coin subscription. Usually these coins cost nothing. These are only a figures on the monitor. Few companies put heart and soul and energy in the projects.

[KobbyC]

I joined this forum as well as cryptocurrency trading in April this year. I have engaged in some ICOs and bounty campaigns but earn so little from the social media campaigns.
What I notice is that the bounty proportion given for signature campaign is always than others. Why that? I believe social media should be high because you reach more people than in signature.
I am just confused.

Social Media reaches a lot of people but signature reaches potential investors here on this platform. Also, signature campaigns are difficult to do as compared to social media. With the signature, you post daily, to get accounts is uneasy. But with social media, getting followers these days is very easy. Signature reach potential investors than social media I think.

[Dracarys26]

You get a targeted audience using the Signature campaign. Also, people can participate in Multiple Social Media campaigns but only one Signature Campaign at a time.

And most of the times, the percentage allotted to Social Media campaigns is more. But, when the stakes are divided you receive less tokens for Social Media and more for Signature campaigns as less people participate in Signature campaigns.